N.Y. Anti-SLAPP Statute Not Retroactive
So a N.Y. appellate court held yesterday.
Plus: More evidence against masking schoolchildren, Amazon's no-checkout grocery store, and more...
The decision allows Smartmatic to proceed with its defamation lawsuit against Fox, two anchors, and Rudy Giuliani.
The case was brought by a Virginia counselor who wants to counsel D.C. clients by video.
The Love in the Time of Contagion author says sexual paranoia is on the rise.
The Ninth Circuit doesn't hold that the chalking ban is unconstitutional, but does conclude that Las Vegas arrests for chalking (as opposed to citations) may be so rare as to raise the inference that they were retaliation for the message.
Yevhen V says likely yes.
Disagreement over pandemic policy accelerates the slide toward authoritarianism in another country.
whether as to anime, "great literature," "soap operas," or "internet memes."
given what the opera houses view as Israel's improper control over the West Bank.
BLM posted racist e-mails that purported to have come from plaintiff, and added that plaintiff's "INFORMATION HAS BEEN VERIFIED"; but the e-mails had apparently come from an ex-tenant who was impersonating her.
The surgeon general's definition of misinformation includes statements that are arguably or verifiably true.
Putin's crime, Dostoevsky's punishment. Well, he's dead, maybe the students' and teacher's punishment.
And has to pay $10K in attorney fees to the high school as well.
They can be banned, so long as the ban is content-neutral, and so long as people remain free to generally march through the neighborhood (as opposed to protesting right outside the target's home).
Two lessons from the Canadian truckers' protest
A new history of free speech argues the best way to defeat hate speech is by openly confronting it in the public square.
UPDATE: As predicted, PETA has moved to intervene. FURTHER UPDATE: The court has indeed allowed PETA to intervene.
It all started with a stolen PlayStation 5.
One judge would have held that threats to injure reputation are criminalized by the law, but the other two disagreed.
The case stems from defendant's claims that plaintiff, a comic book writer, said racist things to her at a comic-book-business social function.
Such laws, which allow redundant prosecutions based on defendants' bigoted beliefs, supposedly are authorized by the amendment that banned slavery.
Will this follow-up to the famous wedding cake case finally decide if this is mandated speech violating the First Amendment?
"You'll have a bunch of people who plead to avoid trial or go broke trying to vindicate their rights."
The plaintiff, Frank Gogol, and the defendant, Malissa White, are both comic book writers.