Congress Asks Is TikTok Really 'An Extension of' the Chinese Communist Party?
TikTok's CEO served as little more than a punching bag for lawmakers with a dizzying array of big tech grievances.
TikTok's CEO served as little more than a punching bag for lawmakers with a dizzying array of big tech grievances.
who allegedly accused it of being an agent of the Israeli government and "refer[red] to individuals associated with the Academy as pigs and use[d] porcine imagery to insult those individuals."
Plus: did the editors sing Happy Birthday to Adam Smith?
Plus: did the editors sing Happy Birthday to Adam Smith?
Plus: Police sue Afroman for using footage from raid, California bill could ban popular junk foods, and more...
A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the law.
My Friday post erroneously stated that I got the bogus results from ChatGPT-4; it turns out they were from ChatGPT-3.5—but ChatGPT-4 does also yield similarly made-up results.
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
upholds the ban on landlords' taking adverse action based on that information.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The 11th Circuit panel refused to lift an injunction against the law.
The latest Twitter Files shows a partnership between Stanford University researchers and government-funded organizations encouraged social media companies to police true information.
[UPDATE: This article originally said this what ChatGPT-4 doing this, which was my error. But, as I note below in an UPDATE, ChatGPT-4 also erroneously reports supposed criminal convictions and sentences, complete with made-up quotes.]
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
Americans shouldn't have to fight to the death to defend their foes' right to speak, but they should at least stop trying to censor, shame, shun and destroy each other.
Understanding what’s at stake in United States v. Hansen
It may be too late for Stanford Law School, but it's not too late for other institutions of higher learning.
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
The Ninth Circuit has just decided not to rehear this case, so the panel opinion remains the law.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Volokh v. James going to the Second Circuit.
and Educational Diversity Among Private Colleges and Universities," by Prof. James Weinstein (Arizona State).
Members of Congress showed their true colors at a Thursday hearing.
other women's testimony about Trump's alleged past sexual assaults.
Criticism of public officials doesn't have to be polite, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court confirmed.
The trade association says the overbroad and vague A.B. 2273 places unconstitutional burdens on speech.
"It's very easy for politicians to legislate freedom away," says Northwood University's Kristin Tokarev. "But it's incredibly hard to get back."
State legislators "have independent agency to do things. I don't control every single bill that has been filed," said DeSantis on Tuesday.
Plus: U.S. special forces seeks “next generation” deepfake tech, the economic cost of the PRO Act, and more…
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.