Trump's Impeachment Lawyers Try To Deconstruct the Link Between What He Said and What His Followers Did
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
The First Amendment and statutory questions in the Douglass Mackey / Ricky Vaughn case.
He is on firmer ground in arguing that the Senate does not have the authority to try a former president, although that issue is highly contested.
Plus: Oklahoma cosmetologists fight insane licensing requirement, Australia doesn't understand how search engines work, and more...
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is suing on her behalf.
I've been seeing many such libel lawsuits recently, though only a few have gone so far as to yield a verdict for the libel plaintiff.
A forthcoming panel Thu., Feb. 11, 2 to 3 pm Pacific, organized by the UCLA Institute for Technology, Law, and Policy.
"The University’s responsibility to protect academic freedom and freedom of expression cannot be outsourced."
An interesting ruling involving the University of Minnesota, by Judge Patrick Schiltz (himself a former professor).
It’s a terrible idea that violates Section 230, but is it actually unconstitutional? Don’t be so sure.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
The House brief does a solid job of laying out the case against Trump. The defense brief is far less impressive.
Plus: Oregon decriminalizes hard drugs, Kroger closes stores over hazard pay rule, and more...
Plus a special appearance by The Princess Bride and Weekend at Bernie's.
The State Bar of Georgia is demanding that the pro-Trump lawyer undergo a mental health evaluation.
The defendant swore a Verizon store employee "cupped her breast and touched her inner thigh," but surveillance video showed otherwise.
Consumers aren't confused about where plant milks come from. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Government will happily suppress misinformation in favor of misinformation of its own.
applied by a federal court in a case involving Juul Labs.
A decision in the case of Ethereum researcher Virgil Griffith, denying his motion to dismiss.
May public schools punish students for off-campus social media posts?
So the Eighth Circuit held yesterday, distinguishing the @RealDonaldTrump case on the grounds that the Trump account was used for much more official activity.
California statutes suggest the answer may be no, so long as the firing is based on the political activity, and not on criminal conduct.
Colleen Oefelein was fired by the Jennifer De Chiara Literary Agency, and the incident illustrates the vagueness of New York law on this point.
Plus: Senators call impeachment trial unconstitutional, Biden cancels private prison contracts, Apple sued over Telegram, and more...
Federal court holds that documents accompanying motions are presumptively accessible even if the case settles before the court decides the motion.
"The only people who broke the law here were the police officers and TBI agents who participated in this flagrantly unconstitutional arrest."
And can't "participate in any protests, rallies or demonstrations."
And, if so, what does this mean for 47 U.S.C. § 230?
"These allegations stand at the heart of plaintiffs' claims, and sealing them would make this litigation virtually incomprehensible to the public."
What went wrong at the outlet he co-founded, what's wrong with the ACLU, and what might go wrong in the Biden administration
The Ohio S. Ct. will take up the question, in the Cincinnati prior restraint case in which we filed an amicus brief.
"The greater the importance of safeguarding the community from incitements to the overthrow of our institutions by force ..., the more imperative is the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of free speech ... to maintain the opportunity for free political discussion, to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes, if desired, may be obtained by peaceful means."
The First Amendment should not be a viable defense in an impeachment trial
Both Hawley's "national conservatism" and similar ideas prevalent in many quarters on the left threaten free speech and liberty more generally.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.