"A Forced, Public Confession of Sins … Is a Humiliation … Incompatible with the … Democratic Principles of the Dignity of Man"
Words from Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
"This current incident, and Marshall's response so far, seem disturbingly similar to prevalent behavior in China [during the Cultural Revolution]—spurious accusations against innocent people, which escalated into institutional insanity."
would they be likely to hire blacks for jobs in China, or anywhere where they might have to hear Mandarin?
More on the Mandarin "neige" controversy.
"In effect, Maffick contends that it is likely to succeed on the merits because its CEO says so. That is far from enough to establish a likelihood of success on the merits, particularly in light of the largely undisputed counter-evidence Facebook tendered."
Fortunately, the N.Y. State Education Department has now reversed the decision, which had been made by the Valley Central School District (about 70 miles north of New York City).
Plus: People have doubts about democracy, Washington state sues Juul, and more...
From Prof. John McWhorter (Columbia) in The Atlantic.
“Just because the story and the photograph may be embarrassing or distressful to the plaintiff does not mean the newspaper cannot publish what is otherwise newsworthy.”
The Cincinnati Enquirer and I have just filed a petition seeking this, in the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Plus: Congress to vote on marijuana decriminalization, tech visas are getting turned down at high rates, and more...
A thought experiment that came to my mind; I'd love to hear what others think about it.
Plus a new draft law review article on the subject, by Prof. Randall Kennedy (Harvard Law School), a leading scholar of race and the law, and me.
Across the Atlantic from Amazonia lies ... Ambazonia.
There is enough evidence that the Times knew their allegations were false (or at least were likely false) to go to the jury.
Three interesting opinions: a sound majority, a plausible concurrence, and another concurrence focused on "hate speech" that I think is unsound.
Dean Lidsky is a libel law scholar, and one of the two Reporters of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Defamation & Privacy.
The Fourth Circuit decides a case involving defendants who violently participated in two white supremacist rallies in California and in the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, but the logic applies equally to rioters of all stripes.
The new law features harsher penalties, 12-hour detentions, and other invitations to abuse government power
When can libel plaintiffs, suing over allegedly false claims of sexual misconduct, sue pseudonymously? When can defendants defend pseudonymously?
So holds a federal court, quite correctly; of course, the same is true about any religious group, racial group, or other such large group.
"This research will inform and fuel much needed and overdue policy change."
An interesting decision in former AP journalist Charles Ganske's lawsuit against former Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, with allegations of Russian bots and Tweeting frenzies thrown in for good measure.
The vice presidential candidate opportunistically painted the site's co-founders as villains when they were actually helping law enforcement to catch sex traffickers.
Unconstitutional, says a Massachusetts appellate court (correctly).
"CBP asks the Court to close the stable door to keep an invisible horse from bolting. But that stable door sat open for five months before CBP asked the Court to secure it. Neither the Court nor CBP know whether the horse is gone, but the possibility that it's still be there can't outweigh public's interest in open doors."
would clearly violate the Constitution, and so would giving a ticket to your lover because of the romantic relationship.
The First Amendment protects "'anti-Israeli, anti-Zionist, [and] antisemitic" speech, the court correctly observes.
threatens to kick students out of class for "othering." Fortunately, the university has stepped in and rejected this position.
mentioning the name of an officer against whom publicly available complaints -- the contents of which matches the contents of the allegedly libelous post -- were filed.
The case was filed against the Maricopa County Community College District, over Prof. Nicholas Damask's World Politics class.
Bonus: We learn that calling a doctor "a real tool" isn't libelous, either.
in a case stemming from the Darren Wilson prosecution.
including on their own non-government-run reelection campaign pages. A federal court has just struck that down.
They can be banned, so long as the ban is content-neutral, and so long as people remain free to generally march through the neighborhood (as opposed to protesting right outside the target's home).
An excellent piece by Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy, one of the nation's leading scholars of race, law, and society.
Even as Americans rely on tech more than ever, our early-pandemic truce with the industry is officially over.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.