Thursday Open Thread
What's on your mind?
It seems unlikely that activists' demands to "keep 1.5 alive" will be met.
Plus: The Reason webathon is happening right now. Donate so we can make more fun podcasts like this one!
While minors were required to be accompanied by an adult to attend the event, state regulators still went after the "not appropriate" drag performance.
under California's "anti-SLAPP" statute (which allows for prompt dismissal of claims brought based on certain kinds of speech).
The White House cited the extraordinarily low recidivism rates among those released and the savings to taxpayers in its veto threat.
Years before a federal case shined a light on the problem, Rankin County Sheriff Bryan Bailey should have known something was amiss.
Serial-blogging my recent article in the Notre Dame Law Review
The article makes the case for disqualification on moral and pragmatic grounds, as well as legal ones.
Reason's annual webathon is the one time each year we ask our online readers, viewers, and listeners to support our libertarian journalism.
President Joe Biden's support for the United Auto Workers might have harmed his push for a faster transition to electric vehicles.
The regulation is part of a suite of new restrictions on hotels sought by the local hotel workers union.
Plus: Trump opts out of debates, blackface story gets a twist, AI-enhanced IRS, and more...
Your tax-deductible donations help to make our next Remy video, powerhouse interview, and mind-blowing documentary possible.
An excursion into Facebook groups for empty nesters shows many of them could use a hobby, a job, or even a straitjacket.
We're often told European countries are better off thanks to big-government policies. So why is the U.S. beating France in many important ways?
Lawyers will have to certify they did not use AI, or verify any work produced by AI.
My wife Alison Somin, an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, outlines the problem.
“I couldn’t believe it was my baby,” Amanda Bews' mother said. "She looked like she was mummified."
Economist Brian Greaney may have found serious methodological errors in a much-cited 2019 article by Enrico Moretti and Chang-Tai Hsieh.
The president touted the lower annualized inflation rate but blamed the companies themselves for higher prices, rather than government policies.
A fiscal commission might be a good idea, but it's also the ultimate expression of Congress' irresponsibility.
Serial-blogging my recent article in the Notre Dame Law Review
At the behest of George Orwell's estate, the acclaimed novelist has brilliantly recast his most famous work.
Moral panic plus government power is an inescapably potent combination.
Plus: Repealing tobacco bans, UN pointlessness, Substack's "Nazi problem," and more…
Donors at the $1,000 level get to join a special private Zoom-chat with The Reason Roundtable!
Flagstaff keeps digging a hole over commercial free speech.
The 4th Circuit’s rejection of Maryland’s handgun licensing system suggests similar schemes in other states are unconstitutional.
Why have so few species been taken off the endangered species list?
The Supreme Court mulls how to apply a mandatory minimum for gun possession by people convicted of drug felonies.
The famed Harvard law professor tries to outline a set of principles liberals - broadly defined - can agree on. And it's a strong effort, even though I have a few caveats and reservations.
"Spoiler: the robot wins for lack of Article III standing."
From March 2021 to July 2023, 74 people were killed and nearly 200 were injured in vehicle chases occurring in counties affected by Operation Lone Star.
Students in four Oklahoma school districts are also required to wear their school ID on a lanyard and sit on their own team's side.
Officers barged into their house without a warrant, shot their dog, and mocked them, a federal civil rights lawsuit says.
In separate criminal racketeering cases, prosecutors are using rap lyrics and the personal diary of a protester shot and killed by police as evidence.
The new film is an anti-epic about the petty awfulness of history's great men.
An important challenge to the use of agency adjudication to enforce federal regulations.
The Supreme Court will consider whether federal agencies’ administrative judges violate the Seventh Amendment.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks