Reason Magazine

Site Search

Continuous news, views, and abuse by the Reason staff

Old File Shows Problems With Mississippi's Dr. Hayne Date Back to Early 1990s

This past June, I was in Louisiana to do some reporting on a possible story.  While there, i was able to track down an old file that a rival had kept on the embattled and now former Mississippi medical examiner, Dr. Steven Hayne.

I've previously explained how in addition to his stranglehold on Mississippi's autopsy business, beginning in the early 1990s, Hayne and his frequent collaborator Dr. Michael West started performing autopsies in several Louisiana parishes, too.  At the time, the forensic pathologist Dr. George McCormick was doing most of the autopsies in Louisiana.  Well aware of Hayne's problems, McCormick assigned another doctor in his office to begin compiling a dossier of complaints against Hayne.  

I should note here that Dr. McCormick had his own ethical problems.  After his death in 2005, Louisiana officials discovered that McCormick had signed off on autopsies performed by unqualified members of his staff, among other transgressions.  McCormick was also upset that Hayne was cutting into his own business as Louisiana's quasi-official state medical examiner.

But McCormick's office merely compiled the dossier on Hayne.  The letters, complaints, and inquiries about Hayne came from other, quite reputable medical examiners from across the south.

I had been trying to track down a copy of McCormick's file on Hayne for a couple of years.  I was finally able to find one while I was in Louisiana.  Essentially, the file further confirms much of what we already know about Hayne, with a few new details.  

Most of the file's documents are from the early- to mid-1990s, and they further put the lie to the line now coming from state officials in Mississippi—that for 20 years, Mississippi has been overwhelmed with criminal autopsies, and that in doing an incredible 1,500-2,000 autopsies per year, Dr. Hayne has been doing the state a great favor.  The truth is, Mississippi officials used Dr. Hayne because he told them what they wanted to hear.  More reputable doctors lost out, and moved elsewhere.  Hayne and his allies in Mississippi government ran out anyone who tried to compete with him, particularly anyone who tried to conduct autopsies in a more impartial manner.  The file also provides further evidence that state officials, professional medical organizations, and the local media were made aware of Hayne's considerable shortcomings 15 years ago.  They did nothing about it.

Dr. McCormick's file should come in handy for Kennedy Brewer, Levon Brooks, or any of the likely other wrongful conviction cases to come involving Hayne should they want to sue the state of Mississippi for damages.  McCormick's file shows that the state had every reason get rid of Dr. Hayne more than a decade ago.  Instead, the state's public officials gave him all the business he could handle.

The documents in the file further confirm that Hayne's domination of Mississippi's autopsy system wasn't by accident.  It was by design.  For example, as I explained in my reason feature on Hayne last October, in the mid-1990s, Hayne, the disgraced Dr. Michael West, and several of Mississippi's county coroners and district attorneys engaged in an enormous power struggle with Mississippi's last official state medical examiner, Dr. Emily Ward.  The old guard was angry with Ward because she wanted to set some minimum standards in autopsy procedures. She wanted coroners to have some training, medical examiners to be certified, and for the state lab to get official accreditation from that National Association of Medical Examiners.  At the time, Dr. Hayne was conducting his marathon, all-night, six-to-ten-at-a-time autopsy sessions in a Rankin, Mississippi funeral home.

Ward also wanted autopsies to be impartial.  Ward's predecessor, Dr. Lloyd White—who also chased out by the good ol' boys—had explained how when he would explain to a district attorney that his autopsy didn't support the DA's case , the DA would merely take the body to Hayne, who would then give the prosecutor the diagnosis he was looking for.  When they would do this to Dr. Ward, she would infuriate the state's prosecutors by calling up the defense counsel and offering to testify for them.  Of course, if the evidence doesn't support the state's case, that's exactly what any impartial, science-based medical examiner should do.  Mississippi DAs then wrote angry letters to the Mississippi commissioner of public safety complaining that Dr. Ward wasn't doing her part as part of the prosecution's team.

The documents in McCormick's file also show that medical examiners across the south who were familiar with Hayne's work weighed in on the Hayne-Ward feud, and tried to get Mississippi officials to do the right thing—back Dr. Ward in her attempt to impose some professional standards in the state.  And of course, that would have effectively put an end to Dr. Hayne's autopsy practice.

But Mississippi officials ignored the warnings from the other doctors.  Dr. Ward was forced to resign, and for the next 13 years, Dr. Hayne did 80-90 percent of Mississippi's autopsies—all the while unsupervised by a qualified, board-certified state medical examiner.  

So if Hayne's no longer doing autopsies in Mississippi, why does all of this matter?  Because Mississippi officials don't seem interested in assessing the damage he's done, and making a serious effort to see how many innocent people he has helped convict, or how many people his testiomny has allowed to go free.

Even after Hayne was effectively barred from doing any more autopsies in the state last month, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, the editorial staff at the Jackson Clarion-Ledger, Public Safety Commissioner Steve Simpson, and the state's district attorneys either praised or excused him for his "service" to Mississippi.  They've cited his willingness to take on a heavy workload as an excuse for his sloppiness. In doing so, they're effectively muting calls for a thorough investigation of the damage he's done to Mississippi's criminal justice system, and they're heading off any momentum toward reopening the thousands of cases in which Hayne has testified.

DNA testing cleared Kennedy Brewer and Levon Brooks, and it will likely clear others in Mississippi.  But there are a significant number of other criminal cases in which someone was convicted based mostly or entirely on Hayne's testimony, where Hayne's testimony was at trial or has since been challenged by a qualified, board-certified forensic pathologist, but the case isn't amenable to DNA testing.  The Jeffrey Havard, Henry Moses, and Devin Bennett cases, are three examples.  These cases won't see any real justice until Mississippi comes to terms with the truth about Dr. Hayne.

Over the next several days, I'll roll out the most significant documents in Dr. McCormick's file on Hayne, and explain their significance.

Send this article to:

Tracking the Palin Rumors

The most disturbing allegation about Sarah Palin's tenure as mayor of Wasilla -- that Palin tried to oust the local librarian because she wouldn't remove offensive books from the shelves -- is starting to look shaky. The Anchorage Daily News reports:
Palin didn't mention specific books at that meeting, [Palin critic Anne] Kilkenny said.

Palin herself, questioned at the time, called her inquiries rhetorical and simply part of a policy discussion with a department head "about understanding and following administration agendas," according to the Frontiersman article.

Were any books...banned? June Pinell-Stephens, chairwoman of the Alaska Library Association's Intellectual Freedom Committee since 1984, checked her files Wednesday and came up empty-handed.
Palin later asked the librarian to resign, but it's far from clear that this was related to the censorship question, given that Palin asked for other officials' resignation around the same time (and given that the subsequent librarian doesn't seem to have removed any controversial books). I don't think the door is closed on this story -- I hope to see more reporting on it -- but whatever did happen, it's a far cry from the over-the-top accusations that have been circulating online. (One frequently forwarded email lists dozens of books that Palin allegedly tried to take off the shelves. More than one of the volumes were actually published after the event. The list turned out to be cut-and-pasted from a catalog of "Books Banned at One Time in the United States.")

Meanwhile, the claim that Palin supported abstinence-only sex education is looking even shakier. The Los Angeles Times points out that Palin is actually to the left of McCain on this issue:
Palin's running mate, John McCain, and the GOP platform say children should be taught that abstinence until marriage is the only safe way to avoid pregnancy and disease. Palin's position is less clear....

In July of [2006], she completed a candidate questionnaire that asked, would she support funding for abstinence-until-marriage programs instead of "explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?"

Palin wrote, "Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support."

But in August of that year, Palin was asked during a KTOO radio debate if "explicit" programs include those that discuss condoms. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms "relatively benign."

"Explicit means explicit," she said. "No, I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don't have a problem with that. That doesn't scare me, so it's something I would support also."
I'm not sure what she means by "explicit," but I can guess: Social conservatives frequently fear that sex ed will turn into a sexual how-to guide, and I suspect she was referring to that. It's clear, at any rate, that the abstinence-only charge is false. It fits popular prejudices about those scary backwoods Christians, though, so we'll probably keep hearing about it.

The most objectionable thing about Palin doesn't have anything to do with fringy positions on traditional morality. It's her willingness to embrace McCain's militarist foreign-policy views. And those ideas, alas, are entirely within the political mainstream.
Send this article to:

Latest Articles on Reason Online

Moral Hazard Watch

The Associated Press's Alan Zibel (didn't he use to write for Saturday Night Live?) reports:
The Bush administration, acting to avert the potential for major financial turmoil, announced Sunday that the federal government was taking control of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Officials announced that the executives of both institutions had been replaced. Herb Allison, a former vice chairman of Merrill Lynch, was selected to head Fannie Mae, and David Moffett, a former vice chairman of US Bancorp, was picked to head Freddie Mac.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says the actions were being taken because "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are so large and so interwoven in our financial system that a failure of either of them would cause great turmoil in our financial markets here at home and around the globe."...

Both companies were placed into a government conservatorship that will be run by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the new agency created by Congress this summer to regulate Fannie and Freddie.
Philip Klein explained what was wrong with this idea back in July.
Send this article to:

Zogby: McCain Leads; Rasmussen: It's All Tied

Take all of this for what you will, what's it worth, etc. But here are two polls about that there presidential election in November that show Republican John McCain doing well about Democrat Barack Obama:

The McCain/Palin ticket wins 49.7% support, compared to 45.9% backing for the Obama/Biden ticket, this latest online survey shows. Another 4.4% either favored someone else or were unsure. 

The Ticket Horserace

9-5/6

8-29/30

McCain-Palin

49.7%

47.1%

Obama-Biden

45.9%

44.6%

Others/Not sure

4.4%

8.3%

In the two-way contest in which just McCain and Obama were mentioned in the question, the result was slightly different, with McCain leading, 48.8% to 45.7%.

One-on-One Horserace

9-5/6

McCain

48.8%

Obama

45.7%

Others/Not sure

5.5%

In a Zogby Interactive survey conducted last weekend, just after the McCain announcement that Palin would join his ticket, McCain Palin won 47.1% support, while Obama/Biden won 44.6% support.

The interactive survey of 2,312 likely voters nationwide was conducted Sept. 5-6, 2008, and carries a margin of error of +/- 2.1 percentage points.

More here.

In the first national [Rasumussen tracking] polling results based entirely on interviews conducted after Sarah Palin's acceptance speech, Barack Obama gets 46% of the vote and so does John McCain. When "leaners" are included, it's all even at 48%....

This past Tuesday, Obama's bounce peaked with the Democrat enjoying a six-percentage point advantage. Before the two conventions were held, Obama had consistently held a one or two point lead over McCain for most of August (see recent daily results).

Tracking Poll results are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, tomorrow (Monday) will be the first update based entirely upon interviews conducted after McCain's speech. By Tuesday or Wednesday, the net impact of both political conventions should be fairly clear....

Forty-two percent (42%) of voters say that economic issues are most important this year and Obama holds a 34-point advantage among these voters.

Twenty-four percent (24%) of voters say the national security issues are most important. Among these voters its McCain by 39.

More here.

Forget about Tuesday or Wednesday—I suspect we'll have a clearer sense of where things are in a week's time, after the memory of the conventions has faded (thank god) and we've got a solid week of slinging back and forth from the campaigns.

It does seem that the presidential debates (and to a lesser degree, the vice presidential version) might have a really serious impact on the presidential vote this time around. And it should be an interesting matchup, with two very different personalities and oratorical styles on display.

I'm very interested to see how Bob Barr fares over the next couple of week, too. He was pulling 5 percent in a Zogby poll a week or so back, and polled as high as 8 percent in an Ohio survey, but seems to have faded since then.

Send this article to:

Revolutionary Rabbit

When the Marxist turned anarchist turned "communalist" Murray Bookchin died two years ago, my obit cited something he produced in the '60s:
I'm fond of his 1969 pamphlet Listen, Marxist!, distributed at SDS's final convention, whose cover took that familiar row of faces from so many Stalinoid tomes -- Marx, Engels, Lenin -- and added Bugs Bunny at the end.
At the time I wanted to include a picture of that cover, but I couldn't find one online. Now Joel Schlosberg has uncovered it:
bugsandmarx
Note that I misremembered Bugs' position: He's not at the end but in the middle, in the place of honor he deserves.
Send this article to:

McCain's Rick Monday Politics

This is just embarrassing. Denver Post columnist (and reason contributor) David Harsanyi reports that the McCain campaign is making political hay out of unused miniature American flags:

This morning, Republicans tell me that a worker at Invesco Field in Denver saved thousands of unused flags from the Democratic National Convention that were headed for the garbage. Guerrilla campaigning. They will use these flags at their own event today in Colorado Springs with John McCain and Sarah Palin.

Before McCain speaks today, veterans will haul these garbage bags filled with flags out onto the stage - with dramatic effect, no doubt - and tell the story.

"What you see in the picture I sent you is less than half of total flags," a Republican official emailed. "We estimate the total number to be around 12,000 small flags and one full size 3×5 flag."

I'm not sure what the DNC was supposed to do with unused hand-flags, frankly. But the Republicans are obviously questioning someone's patriotism here.

Yes they are. And they should be ashamed of themselves for engaging in such a pathetic stunt. I have previously argued that the "questioning our patriotism" meme was, for the most part, a straw man. Sure, some crackpot bloggers had done just that, as had vile "journalists" like Jerome Corsi, but McCain seemed to avoid such tactics. But things are getting tight, November is just around the corner, and the McCain campaign seems to be indulging in the most pitiful jingoism since Kang and Kodos ran for President.

Send this article to:

Poor Charlie

Has Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) cancelled his subscription to The New York Times yet or what? First, the eminent domain-loving daily breaks the news that Rangel is a self-righteous rent control scofflaw. Now the Gray Lady reports that the dapper Harlem congressman has failed to report some $75,000 in rental fees from a villa he owns in the Dominican Republic. Seriously, this guy has four rent-stabilized New York apartments and a villa that rents out for $500 a night? Now we know how he can afford all those great suits. From the Times:
New York State law classifies filing a false city or state tax return a felony punishable by up to four years in prison, but Kathleen M. Pakenham, a tax lawyer at the law firm of White & Case, said criminal prosecutions are rare and in most cases, the taxpayer is simply fined 20 percent of the back taxes owed.

[...]

Whatever his legal exposure, the tax problems present a political embarrassment for Mr. Rangel, a Harlem Democrat who has sat on the Ways and Means Committee since 1975. As chairman, Mr. Rangel has pushed for higher taxes on the wealthy, unveiling a $1.3 trillion proposal last year that businesses denounced as a threat to the economy.
Whole thing here.
Send this article to:

O'Reilly v. O'Bama

According to this story from Michael Wolff, Barack Obama had a Johnny Sack-style sit down with News Corp's Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes, wherein they brokered some sort of truce. If my occasional viewing of Fox News is any indication, I'm not sure exactly what was required on Fox's end; they are, after all, as hostile to Obama now as anytime in the recent past. But I suspect that, whatever the details of the discussion, the broader mission was to get Obama to submit to an interview with Fox's resident pitbull, Bill O'Reilly. Part one aired last night and O'Reilly was, by turns, deferential and caustic. Full credit to Obama, though, for dishing it right back.

Also, not being a regular viewer of The O'Reilly Factor, I was unaware that Papa Bear (now) believes that Iraq was the "wrong battlefield."

Send this article to:

New at Reason: Tim Cavanaugh Compares the Republican and Democratic Conventions

In his final report from Minnesota, reason columnist Tim Cavanaugh explains what the major party conventions can tell us about the state of American politics.

Read all about it here.

Send this article to:

It's the Economy, Stupid, Redux?

The jobless rate jumped to 6.1 percent in August, from 5.7 percent in July. And, employers cut payrolls for the eighth month in a row. Job losses in June and July turned out to be much deeper. The economy lost a whopping 100,000 jobs in June and another 60,000 in July, according to revised figures. Previously, the government reported job losses at 51,000 in each of those months.

So far this year, job losses totaled 605,000.

The latest snapshot was worse than economists were forecasting. They were predicting payrolls would drop by around 75,000 in August and the jobless rate to tick up a notch, to 5.8 percent. The grim news comes as the race for the White House kicks into high gear. The economy's troubles are Americans' top worry.

On the flip side, worker wages gained about 0.4 percent in August over July. And second-quarter growth (latest available) was 3.3 percent (up from an original 1.9 percent estimate).

More here.

reason's Matt Welch on bubble bursting here.

Seasonal adjusted uemployment rates by month for past 10 years here.

Average annual unemployment rates going back to 1948 (fascinating!) here.

Send this article to:

Bill Me, Baby

Whoops...

People calling a federal phone number to order duck stamps are instead greeted by a phone-sex line, due to a printing error the government says would be too expensive to correct. The carrier card for the duck stamp transposes two numbers, so instead of listing 1-800-782-6724, it lists 1-800-872-6724. The first number spells out 1-800-STAMP24, while the second number spells out 1-800-TRAMP24.
People calling that second number are welcomed by "Intimate Connections" and enticed by a husky female voice to "talk only to the girls that turn you on," for $1.99 a minute.
I'm sure the collective wit of H&R commenters can produce a better pun than the one in my headline.
Send this article to:

Another Isolated Incident

Last June, police in St. Louis broke in to the home of an 86-year-old woman, deployed a "smoke bomb," and turned her place upside down in what looks to be a mistaken drug raid.  A clergyman from the woman's church has been trying to get an apology and compensation, but thus far has been rebuffed by city officials.

“We’ve been battling since June,” Brown said. “The (police) board is for the birds, when it comes to citizens. I talked to one board member, but he was very insulting. They just closed the door in our face.”


Valentine wants an apology from the department and compensation for the damage done to her psyche and home.

“She’s scared, and when she hears loud noises outside she thinks it’s the police coming in her house,” Brown said.

[...]

“When they realized they’d been had, why didn’t they just get everyone’s information and write a report for a complaint number and take it to the City counselor, who could get the right department to pay for damages?” Broughton said.

Instead, Valentine and Brown said the officers threatened to the take the elderly lady’s house when they left.

Police tore down Valentine's door, ripped up her walls, sliced open her mattress, and seized a safe containing stationery.  They found no drugs, made no arrests, and, three months later, have made no offer to compensate her for the damage done to her home.

Send this article to:

Internal Investigation: Slaughter of Mayor's Dogs During Botched Drug Raid Justified

In a decision that shouldn't surprise anyone, an internal investigation by the Prince George's County, Maryland Sheriff's Department has determined that raiding officers acted entirely appropriately when they shot and killed two pet labradors during a mistaken drug raid at the home of Berwyn Heights Mayor Cheye Calvo.

Neither Calvo nor his mother-in-law—both in the house as the raid transpired—were interviewed for the investigation.  Calvo says one of the dogs was shot as it was running away, an assertion supported by a veterinary examination showing an entry wound to the back of one of the dog's legs.

Prior posts on the Calvo raid here.  I'll be speaking on a panel with Calvo and Peter Christ of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition on Thursday, September 11 at the Cato Institute.

Send this article to:

Random Bloggage

* Noam Chomsky's "Augustinian anarchism"

* Steven Byington's small-town, Bible-translating, letter-writing anarchism

* music in concentration camps

* gays and globalization in India

* southern vs. western evangelicalism

* unsung beneficiaries of the housing bust: homeless bobcats!
Send this article to:

New at Reason: Matt Welch Talks Affirmative Action, Black Power Politics, and Barack Obama's Grades with Wayne Allyn Root

Last week at the Democratic National Convention, Matt Welch and Tim Cavanaugh interviewed Libertarian vice presidential candidate Wayne Allyn Root, who offered the following challenge to his former Columbia University classmate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.): "I'll put a million dollars cash on the fact...that my GPA was better than Barack's."

Read all about it here.

Send this article to:

Drill, Baby, Drill?

Many of this week's biggest applause lines had to do with drilling for oil. I, like Tyler Cowen, tend to assume that anything that comes out of a politician's mouth that involves economics (particularly anything in that category that induces a stadium of delegates to cheer) is probably dumb. But wait! Wouldn't it be great if someone had actually done a study to quantify the potential benefits of drilling? Ta da!:

The best estimate of economically recoverable oil in the federal portion of ANWR is 7.06 billion barrels of oil, a quantity roughly equal to US consumption in 2005. The oil is worth $374 billion ($2005), but would cost $123 billion to extract and bring to market. The difference, $251 billion,would generate social benefits through industry rents of $90 billion as well as state and federal tax revenues of $37 billion and $124 billion, respectively.

These figures are from 2007 when oil was roughly half the price it is today. Cowen updates the numbers for a rough estimate of $600 billion in benefits (minus environmental costs). That's, give or take, the GDP of Brazil.

Send this article to:

New at Reason: Friday Funnies

In the latest edition of Friday Funnies, Chip Bok introduces Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
Send this article to:

Britain Has a New Crown Jewel

Finally—or, So soon?—Sherry Jones has found a publisher for her lusty Islamic love story (and it has its own heavily-sourced and lengthy Wikipedia entry!):

[British] Publisher Martin Rynja (of British publishing house Gibson Square), describing himself as "completely bowled over by the novel and the moving love story it portrays," called Jones's book "an important barometer of our time":

"In an open society there has to be open access to literary works, regardless of fear," Rynja said in a press release. "As an independent publishing company, we feel strongly that we should not be afraid of the consequences of debate. If a novel of quality and skill that casts light on a beautiful subject we know too little of in the West, but have a genuine interest in, cannot be published here, it would truly mean that the clock has been turned back to the dark ages."

Leave it to the Brits, with their libel-happy laws and their magazine police, to go where Americans dare not read. There's a first time for everything, I suppose.

Michael C. Moynihan on Jones here. Yours truly on Jones here and here. Ron Bailey here on the type of readers Random House didn't want to risk offending.

Send this article to:

Just When I Wonder If I'm Too Hard on Treehuggers

...they pull something like this.


Emotional Hippies - Crying Over Dead Trees - Watch more free videos

I love trees, too. But my goodness.

I was very skeptical of the authenticity of this video, and remain mildly so. But Syndee L'ome Grace is real. She's been around the movement for a long time, doing things—like leading "rap sessions" at the 1996 World Vegetarian Conference on "Loving and Coping with Our Meat Eating Friends and Family," getting thanked in The Vegan Sourcebook—which make sitting in the forest mourning dead trees a plausible followup activity.

This cry-in seems to have been sponsored by Earth First! (or some faction thereof), a group known for taking things too far—like car-bombs-and-puke-ins too far. A little wailing in the woods is nothing to these guys.

Via The Chilling Effect

Send this article to:

More Adventures of the Keystone KGB

While some of my media comrades are busy addressing the supposedly ineffable (Who's the mommy?), and awaiting the predictable (tonight's speeches), I'll take this moment to catch up on the goings-on in Putin's Russia. We'll start with opposition journalist Magomed Yevloyev, who ran afoul of local leaders in Ingushetia and was "accidently" shot in the head by the Russian police. As The Economist noted, "even by Russia's recent bloody standards, it was a brazen killing." The BBC has details:

According to a lawyer close to the website, Mr Yevloyev was detained by police after landing at Nazran airport late on Sunday. They took him away in a car, Reuters reports. "As they drove he was shot in the temple... They threw him out of the car near the hospital," Kaloi Akhilgov said.
Then there is the case of itinerant English teacher Michael White, who stands accused of fomenting war between Russia and Georgia. According to Kremlin officials, White's passport was captured on the battlefield by Russian forces. Nonsense, White says. From the WSJ:

The passport the Russians showed off last week does appear to have been Mr. White's. He says it looks to be the one he accidentally left in the seat pocket of a Moscow-New York flight in October 2005. "It seems probable that some Russian person on the flight picked it up," says Mr. White.

The U.S. State Department confirms Mr. White reported the passport missing in 2005 and that it was canceled. Mr. White was issued a new U.S. passport that year, and another in 2008, both of which he showed a reporter.

[...]

Milton Bearden, a highly decorated former CIA operative, dismissed the notion that an intelligence agent with any intelligence would carry his passport with him in the field, much less lose it. He characterized the Russian claims as "slapstick," saying that if a passport is going to be held up as evidence of U.S. meddling, "it shouldn't belong to some guy teaching English in China."

Alexei Kondaurov, a KGB veteran and critic of the Kremlin, said that "using a 'found' passport to expose the Americans seems really small-time," adding that "the Soviet Union's secret services never stooped that low."

From The Guardian's Russia correspondent Luke Harding comes this fascinating piece, in which he writes that "In South Ossetia, I witnessed the worst ethnic cleansing since the war in the Balkans." For those unfamiliar with The Guardian's politics, it should be mentioned that they have been predictably hostile to Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili, their editorial page editor writing that the Georgia conflict was some sort of neoconservative setup. A snippet from Harding:
Refugees from Karaleti and nearby villages gave the same account: South Ossetian militias had swept in on August 12, killing, burning, stealing and kidnapping. Sasha, our Kremlin minder, however, had a different explanation. "Georgian special commandos burned the houses," he told us. I demurred, pointing out that it was unlikely Georgian special commandos would have burned down Georgian villages north of Tskhinvali, deep inside rebel-held South Ossetia. Sasha's face grew dark; he wasn't used to contradiction. "Those houses suffered from a gas or electricity leak," he answered majestically.

Full story.

Send this article to:

New at Reason: Tim Cavanaugh on the new face of identity politics

White identity politics have been around for a while, in the form of cracker culture humor, Gretchen Wilson records, and the war on arugula, writes Tim Cavanaugh. But in last night's convention speech, Sarah Palin offered a new brand of identity politics.

Read all about it here.

Send this article to:

New at Reason: Matt Welch on Republican Economics

"Reform" night didn't really mention any of John McCain reforms, writes Matt Welch, but it did celebrate the economic incoherence of the Republican Party.

Read all about it here.

Send this article to:

A Video Poem from the Last Days of the Republic (Ron Paul Flyover Edition)

<