Nick Shirley, Tim Walz, and the Minnesota Fraud Story: Did the Media Miss It?
Local reporters have covered state daycare fraud for years, though it did not exactly receive wall-to-wall national attention.
Local reporters have covered state daycare fraud for years, though it did not exactly receive wall-to-wall national attention.
The best way to ensure healthy outcomes and protect children from the partisan crossfire of D.C. politicking is to break the federal grip on nutrition programs.
Katherine Mangu-Ward and Alex Nowrasteh squared off against Rich Lowry and Steven Camarota to debate immigration.
Britain’s invisible people are caught in a welfare trap.
Telling states to pay for a share of the food stamp program makes a lot of sense and would likely reduce fraud.
As conservatives push for cuts, lasting reform will require closing accountability gaps and restructuring entitlements.
Researchers found that giving people $1,000 every month for three years resulted in decreased productivity and earnings, and more leisure time.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Plus: A listener asks about the absurdity of Social Security entitlements.
An obvious, tepid reform was greeted with shrill partisan screeching.
The policy is a true budget buster and is ineffective in the long term.
It's not robbing Peter to pay Paul. It's more like robbing Peter to pay Peter.
If you don't take Oliver Anthony's surprise hit song too seriously, it's a lot of fun. Regrettably, a lot of people are taking the song much too seriously indeed.
New work requirements will target those over age 50, but the debt ceiling deal also loosens existing work requirements for those under age 50.
The policy has some bipartisan support, despite the fact that it has mostly been a failure since its inception.
The G Word, a new documentary, only occasionally covers serious issues. But it opts not to do honest reporting.
Plus: perpetual "scope creep" of the welfare state
Replacing parts of SNAP with a poorly overseen food delivery program turned out to be an expensive disaster.
Work, not dependency, was what lifted many people up out of poverty.
Using the process of elimination, the culprit seems clear.
The pandemic relief bill isn't just a one-time splurge. It's the start of a new era of federal spending.
In most circumstances, parents would be eligible to receive $3,000 per child annually, doled out in monthly checks. It could be a major overhaul of how the federal government handles welfare.
This is why we can't have serious conversations about government spending.
New research shows that income surveys erroneously categorized some households as extremely poor actually had "net worth in the millions" of dollars.
Center for American Progress' Neera Tanden and Foundation for Government Accountability's Tarran Bragdon debate government handouts at the Soho Forum.
Neera Tanden from the Center for American Progress vs. Tarren Bragdon from the Foundation for Government Accountability.
Neera Tanden from the Center for American Progress vs. Tarren Bragdon from the Foundation for Government Accountability at the Soho Forum.
The party is in trouble because of Prime Minister Theresa May's dementia tax
Not only can entitlement programs be rolled back, but politicians who do it can even get re-elected.
The basic-income scheme is meant to save Finland money and reduce the country's high unemployment rate.
What's worthwhile in the Wisconsin congressman's proposals, and what's not
The pros and cons of a welfare idea championed by liberals and libertarians alike
Clay Shaw, 74, added work requirements to welfare rules in bipartisan effort with Clinton administration
Federal regulations run up against federal regulations
Government has decided that a family with one parent earning over £50,000 a year doesn't need the extra cash
Administration says it won't waive work requirements, just eliminate bureaucratic barriers
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks