People Are Fleeing California Cities, Despite Pols' Push for 'Urbanism'
San Francisco lost a whopping 6.7 percent of its population during the COVID-19 pandemic, the second-largest percentage drop after New York.
San Francisco lost a whopping 6.7 percent of its population during the COVID-19 pandemic, the second-largest percentage drop after New York.
It includes commentary by housing policy specialist Emily Hamilton (Mercatus Center), and economist Filipe Campante (Johns Hopkins University).
Recordings of recent interviews on these topics with T.J. O'Hara for the Deconstructed podcast, and Areva Martin on her talk show program, Special Report.
The article challenges longstanding conventional wisdom claiming that judicial review of democratically enacted laws is at odds with popular political choice.
How foot voting can expand political freedom for Americans, particularly the poor and disadvantaged.
Recent articles in the Texas Monthy and the New York Times provide some useful insight on why Texas has been gaining migrants at such a high rate.
We cover many issues related to the book, as well as freedom of movement more generally - both domestic and international.
Now available on Amazon, after a supply chain delay.
Widespread remote work opens up new opportunities for foot voting, but may in some cases make foot voting less important.
The revised edition addresses several new issues including arguments that migration must be restricted to curtail the spread of dangerous diseases, such as Covid-19, claims that immigration might generate a political backlash that threatens democracy, and the impact of remote work on foot voting.
The post focuses attention on an aspect of federalism that is often overlooked in current law and policy debates.
The article explains how expanding opportunities for foot voting can enhance political choice, help the poor and disadvantaged, and reduce the dangers of political polarization.
Labor Day is a good time to remember that we can make workers vastly better off by empowering more of them to vote with their feet.
California has morphed from a land of limitless opportunity to a highly regulated land of limits and control. No wonder so many people are leaving.
As in the US, they often block the building of new housing in response to demand.
As a recent Washington Post article explains, the combination of low taxes, job opportunities, and few restrictions on building new housing are crucial to the state's success. Both major parties have much to learn from Texas' experience.
Cato Institute scholar David Bier quantifies the enormous extent to which immigration increases freedom.
Specifically, political scientist Ilia Murtazashvili has published a review of my book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom," in a leading political economy journal.
I was interviewed by Joe Salvetta of the Pioneer Institute, a leading Massachusetts public policy think tank.
The Supreme Court did not resolve the case today, but did take the noteworthy step of asking for the views of the federal government.
The case was filed directly in the Supreme Court under its "original jurisdiction" over cases filed by one state against another. It could have important implications for the future of federalism.
The article adapts and expands some of the ideas developed in my recent book "Free to Move," and is now available for free download on SSRN.
Plus: Gov. Andrew Cuomo demonstrates how not to handle vaccine distribution , Americans are fleeing big cities and high tax states, and more...
The Harvard economist explains how to expand opportunity for the young by deregulating housing, labor, and education.
California is driving on fumes and living off the residual investments and innovations of past generations. Is it any wonder so many Californians are heading to Texas or Arizona?
My response to a badly inaccurate review of my book that portrays me as claiming otherwise.
The combination of foot voting and decentralization of power can offer people more and better choices than are available at the ballot box.
The event is free and open to the public.
The event was sponsored by the Miller Center for Public Affairs.
Adam Thierer, author of the lead essay, has a response to his critics.
The symposium includes contributions by Adam Thierer, Mikayla Novak, Max Borders, and myself. The relationship between exit and voice is as important an issue as ever.
The event will be held on August 13, and is free and open to the public.
Fifth and final post in a series based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
Fourth in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom."
Third in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom."
The interview was conducted by Trevor Burrus and Aaron Ross Powell of the Cato Institute.
Second in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
The event includes questions and commentary by Northwestern University law Professor John McGinnis
The Introduction summarizes the book's argument and provides an outline of the chapters that follow.
It is now up on his Balkinization blog.
Professor Balkin asked me many great questions in interview just published at his Balkinization blog.
Audio of podcasts with Vanderblit philosophy Prof. Robert Talisse, for the New Books Network, and University of Kentucky law Prof. Brian Frye's Ipse Dixit podcast series.
The talk is sponsored by the Oxford Hayek Society and Students for Liberty UK. But anyone anywhere in the world can watch and ask questions - for free!
The video was produced by the Institute for Humane Studies, and goes over some key themes of the book.
Videos of interviews by political commentator Amy Peikoff and immigration lawyer Nathan Brown.
The symposium, which includes a contribution from me, reviews important new books on secession by Timothy William Waters and Frank Buckley.
It's available for preorder now, and will be delivered on April 23
States have so far taken the lead in battling the coronavirus, and there is some merit to this decentralized approach, which fits the original meaning of the Constitution. But it also has flaws, and there is still a good chance the crisis will ultimately lead to an expansion of federal power.