The Trade War Is Eroding America's Soft Power
The debate over free trade should include more than the costs of Trump's tariffs versus the value of cheaper stuff.
The debate over free trade should include more than the costs of Trump's tariffs versus the value of cheaper stuff.
Instead of making a headlong rush at the endangerment finding, the Administration is adopting a more targeted deregulatory strategy.
It's the best shield when the executive branch tries to strong-arm private universities.
A federal judge blocks the administration's "Student Criminal Alien Initiative," which targeted foreign students who had no criminal records.
A defense of the Supreme Court's decision to let President Trump remove members of the NLRB and MSPB.
Trump’s firing of a federal agency head may soon spell doom for a New Deal era precedent that limited presidential power.
Whether due to tariffs or because they are made in America, the result would be much higher prices.
Plus: NYC can't build a damn park, violence against diplomats, worrying news from Anthropic, and more...
The more important the product—and food certainly ranks high on any list—the better it is to allow markets to work.
The "one big, beautiful bill" keeps the corporate welfare that Republicans claim to hate.
The Federal Trade Commission was established to protect consumers. Under Biden and Trump, its focus has shifted.
The lesson from the Moody's credit downgrade is that the U.S. cannot borrow its way to prosperity.
In the name of "restoring freedom of speech," FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson wants to override the editorial judgments of social media platforms.
"It's not just one or two administrative errors," says the Cato Institute's David Bier.
That logic implausibly assumes presidents have the power to curtail substance abuse by attacking the drug supply.
The legal principle safeguards civil liberties, protecting even unpopular people from the government.
One of the recipients has filed for bankruptcy after allegedly scamming elderly clients.
Stephen Miller's trial balloon about abrogating habeas corpus in immigration cases shows how any libertarian with pragmatic intelligence should reject so-called "libertarian" arguments for strict immigration laws.
The 1866 debate over birthright citizenship included a debate over immigration.
Plus: Tim Dillon takes on the establishment, Chicago's racist hiring strategies, train fetishes, and more...
Friday's announcement by Moody's and the House Budget Committee vote could have been a turning point.
The latest SCOTUS order shows the justices are taking a more nuanced approach to district court injunctions of Trump Administration policies than its critics, left or right.
The Trump administration's plans to slash science funding could end up liberating researchers from the corrupting influence Dwight Eisenhower warned about.
On the bright side, at least Trump finally admitted his tariffs are, indeed, paid by Americans.
Plus: That big, beautiful bill; Romanian election results; China's pivot to nuclear; and more...
A majority of the justices seem unconvinced the Administration was prepared to provide the process that was due. Justices Alito and Thomas dissent.
The Department of Education doesn’t handle teaching, set curricula, or pay teacher salaries.
Seasonally adjusted job openings and capital outlay spending are declining to levels not seen since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
President Donald Trump's executive order empowering local cops will create bad incentives that could prove costly for law-abiding citizens.
Make dishwashers great again.
The president's executive order on birthright citizenship had its first test before the Supreme Court.
Scenes from a trade war.
"The reason they're doing this is to try to create an environment of fear, to try to get people like myself...to shut the fuck up," said Hasan Piker.
Plus: Tulsi does Trump's bidding, a new front opens in New York's war on weed, and more...
The administration shows no coherent commitment to free market principles and is in fact actively undermining them.
The text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment run counter to Trump’s executive order.
The president’s speech in Saudi Arabia promised a new course for U.S. policy in the Middle East. Can he deliver?
The White House calls it "the art of the deal," but a 30 percent tariff on imports from China is economically damaging and constitutionally dubious.
Plus: Qatar-a-Lago, Ocasio-Cortez sure looks interested in running, how Mississippi public schools improved, and more...
"If this is the end of my American dream," says one small business owner, "I'm going to go down swinging."
Trump rightly decries the "absurd and unjust" consequences of proliferating regulatory crimes.
Stephen Miller's understanding of the Constitution is dubious for several reasons.
The president hopes to introduce even more government intervention into health care.
Plus: Homeless encampments in California, taxing university endowments, and more...
“Between the cost of labor and the inputs that goes in, it’s more cost-effective for farmers” to plow over ripe tomatoes, said one expert.
Briefs urging the Supreme Court to stay injunctions against the order challenge "the conventional wisdom" about the meaning of an 1898 decision interpreting the 14th Amendment.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks