United Kingdom Bombing ISIS in Syria, RAF Captain 'Absolutely Confident' There Would Be No Civilian Casualties
Cameron says the airstrikes would keep Britain safe.
Cameron says the airstrikes would keep Britain safe.
Assad was our son of a bitch when the U.S. government needed him. Then he outlived his usefulness.
Thank God for a renewed sense of common purpose in these desultory, fractured, and hyper-partisan times.
Country will harbor single dudes only if they're gay, for now.
Panic-driven reactions to terrorism that make no sense upon reflection
It turns out they have nothing to do with each other, which has some people upset.
We shouldn't fear extending our hand to those who flee oppression. A world of zero risk is not an option, but the risk here is not significant.
Committing American boots on the ground is not a morally superior option to taking refugees
Grandstanding politicians fan fear, but don't know what they are talking about
Captagon captures the imaginations of yellow journalists.
Another day, another rank attack on basic constitutional principles from Trump.
American SAFE Act passed with bipartisan support
The former New Mexico governor and 2012 Libertarian Party presidential candidate makes first comments on recent turmoil, talks future.
Accepting refugees would go a long way to win hearts and minds. So would ending stupid interventions.
The Global Terrorism Index charts 80 percent increase in terrorism deaths, with 33,000 killed in 2014.
If ISIS victims are banned from America, only ISIS will get in
Before anyone was afraid of ISIS terrorists disguised as Syrian refugees, Americans were afraid of Nazi agents disguised as Jewish refugees.
At least 26 governors now oppose letting Syrian refugees resettle in their states.
And will Ted Cruz consider that the Mideast is not suffering from too little US attention but too much?
Trying to gain power by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people
"ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror" co-author Michael Weiss on how Obama allowed a bad situation to get worse in Syria.
Debate answer exposes a revealing problem not just for the inexperienced candidate, but for the bellicose GOP
If we really live under a representative government, how can a president take the country to war in Syria without even a show vote in Congress?
Individual persons who did no harm to anyone are being slaughtered and starved with the help of American politicians and military bureaucrats.
Continuation of policy acknowledgment signaled over last week.
Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter says to expect more U.S. "direct action on the ground" in Iraq.
With good governance and strong property rights, they could.
"ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror" co-author Michael Weiss on how Obama allowed a bad situation to get worse in Syria.
"Look, there's no doubt that it did not work," says president.
Doing something for no good reason isn't a viable policy doctrine.
It's a Zionist conspiracy, of course
The ruling elite's machinations bear no relationship to the general interest of Americans. Think what the American empire would be if we refused to cooperate.
It's stupid season for American political commentary about the refugee crisis
U.S. says it makes the conflict riskier
The only one saying much is Martin O'Malley.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10