How Do You Like Greg Abbott's New, Improved Constitution?
The Texas governor suggests nine amendments "to restore the rule of law."
The Texas governor suggests nine amendments "to restore the rule of law."
The Supreme Court hears Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association.
Can the government compel non-members to pay mandatory union fees?
Gov. Doug Ducey makes his first appointment to the state's highest court.
Supreme Court will hear the case next week.
The 2015-2016 SCOTUS term heats back up.
The upcoming year promises to be a big one for reproductive-liberty issues. Here are five major conflicts to keep an eye on.
Public schools should not have the power to punish off-campus speech.
A high school senior was suspended for recording a rap song.
Drivers should not be punished for balking at warrantless alcohol testing.
Another Step Closer to Full Legalization
Three DUI cases give SCOTUS a chance to clarify the constitutional requirements for drug and alcohol testing.
The Obama administration says Nebraska and Oklahoma have not described a genuine controversy with Colorado.
The Supreme Court agrees to hear three new cases dealing with drunk driving suspects and the Fourth Amendment.
The Supreme Court hears arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Justice Thomas faults his colleagues for "relegating the Second Amendment to a second-class right."
At least 26 governors now oppose letting Syrian refugees resettle in their states.
SCOTUS decision on Texas abortion law could reverberate far beyond Lone Star state
The Supreme Court's 2015-2016 takes shape.
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Luis v. United States.
The liberal justice files a lone dissent in Mullenix v. Luna.
Obamacare is headed back to SCOTUS.
The Supreme Court may end mandatory union dues for California school teachers and limit state taking of property.
SCOTUS hears arguments in Foster v. Chatman.
Justice Kennedy defends his vote in the free speech case.
The Supreme Court deserves more attention in the 2016 White House race.
Examining the role of dissenting opinions in U.S. legal history.
Connecticut teeth-whitening monopoly lands at Supreme Court.
Trump's support for Kelo v. City of New London reveals his fundamentally unconstitutional support for eminent domain abuse.
Trump tried to seize an elderly widow's home via eminent domain.
What The New Yorker gets wrong about guns and the Constitution.
Liberal pundit alarmed by competing versions of legal conservatism.
Why Donald Trump is wrong about the text and history of the 14th Amendment.
Pataki and Graham get that Kim Davis is not a businessowner.
Elected officials cannot be fired, which makes it that much harder to hold them accountable.
"Reject clichéd calls for 'judicial restraint'"
There is no right to draw a paycheck for a job you refuse to do.
The Gray Lady misleads its readers about the conservative Supreme Court justice.
Wanted to essentially refight the confirmation battle (from the other side this time)
Libertarians are changing the face of legal conservatism.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks