The Senate Has Confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court
All Democrats voted in opposition, making Barrett's confirmation the most partisan since Reconstruction.
All Democrats voted in opposition, making Barrett's confirmation the most partisan since Reconstruction.
The Supreme Court nominee weighs in on a famous case.
A Supreme Court Preview panel that focuses on administrative law.
The implications of this move are far from clear. But it could well be a step to avoid court-packing, rather than promote it.
In a preview of an interview that will air Sunday, Biden says he'd pick "Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives" to serve on the body, which would make broad recommendations for reforming federal courts.
Democrats and Republicans agree on that point, although they disagree about what it means in practice.
"This is probably not about persuading each other unless something really dramatic happens," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.)
The court split 4-4 in what could have been a major election decision.
Among today's cert grants were a case concerning the border wall and another on the Trump Administration's Migrant Protection Protocols
Americans likely learned very little about her judicial philosophy.
They have serious flaws, many of which are on display this week. But we are still better off with them than without them.
In several cases, the Supreme Court nominee voted to allow civil rights lawsuits against officers accused of misconduct.
The senator thinks people with felony records should lose the right to armed self-defense but not the right to cast a ballot.
If that standard were applied to other constitutional rights, no one would be left to enforce them.
Plus: DOJ sues over Melania Trump adviser's book, Justice Clarence Thomas wants to limit Section 230, and more....
Would regular SCOTUS confirmations produce too much volatility in the case law? I am unconvinced.
Although Democrats think the composition of the Supreme Court is a big election issue, their nominee won’t say what he plans to do about it.
Sens. Mazie Hirono and Cory Booker both criticized the Supreme Court nominee for saying "preference" instead of "orientation."
Such theories are not based in fact.
The Texas senator notes the opposing party's blind spots on freedom of speech and the right to arms.
The Court adds an important Appointments Clause case to the docket.
Petitions for certiorari in the other two Emoluments Clause cases remain pending.
Republicans understandably prepared for attacks on Barrett's faith which thankfully haven't materialized.
There is little reason to think Barrett would vote to overturn the Affordable Care Act, which in any case seems legally secure.
Plus: $150,000+ in fines in NYC's first weekend of new shutdowns, California ballot-box confusion, and more...
She's unlikely to cast a vote to strike down the law as a whole, and unlikely to have a decisive impact on its fate even if she does.
The National Law Journal asked several legal commentators to suggest questions for the president's Supreme Court nominee.
Plus: Trump says he plans to hold rallies despite lack of negative COVID-19 test, Biden won't answer question on court-packing, and more...
Two debates. Two dodges of an important question about the top court's future.
The original rules might not be found in the text.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito worry about the future of religious freedom. That’s not the same as a call to overturn the decision.
The Supreme Court decides a decent number of environmental cases, but does not seem particularly interested in environmental concerns.
When it comes to criminal justice and abortion, Barrett and Ginsburg may have far more in common than conservatives and progressives seem to realize.
Does participation in a moot court require recusal?
A core element of the latest case against the Affordable Care Act rests on a legal fiction.
As more senators test positive for COVID-19, the ability of the Senate to conduct business is threatened.
The Supreme Court accepted certiorari on a climate change case today.
"If it were me, I would certainly put my nominee forth," Jorgensen says. Partisan bickering over the confirmation process is just "politics as usual."
Judge Amy Coney Barrett participated in a moot court of Texas v. California, and it did not go well for the challengers.
The 7th Circuit judge’s track record suggests she would frequently be a friend of civil liberties.
Supreme Court term limits are a good idea. But they must be enacted by constitutional amendment, not by statute.
Major-party politicians avoid tax simplification almost as aggressively as the rich avoid taxation, argue the Reason Roundtable panelists.
Noah Feldman explains why liberals should want someone like Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court
The opinion, which suggests a strong concern about due process, will nevertheless be cited as evidence of the SCOTUS nominee's "uniformly conservative" record.