Gorsuch and Kavanaugh Butt Heads in Major Immigration Case
“Our only job today, is to give the law’s terms their ordinary meanings and, in that small way, ensure that the federal government does not exceed its statutory license.”
“Our only job today, is to give the law’s terms their ordinary meanings and, in that small way, ensure that the federal government does not exceed its statutory license.”
A book that may may help decide the Supreme Court's upcoming right to carry case.
The Supreme Court weighs the power of school officials to punish students for off-campus speech.
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Niz-Chavez v. Garland is not what you might have expected, but it may be a sign of things to come.
New York, like several other states, limits public carrying of handguns to the favored few.
The Biden Administration's effort to moot challenges to the Trump Administration's "public charge" rule scores an initial (yet potentially temporary) victory.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments next term in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett.
The feds say they can paw through your phone and laptop any time you enter or leave the country.
SCOTUS released three decisions this morning, as we await big decisions concerning religious liberty, the Affordable Care Act, and some meaty administrative law questions.
Bans on dangling objects are just one example of the myriad petty rules that give police the power to stop nearly any driver at will.
"How can an ordinary person afford to wait years after the government takes their car?"
Progressive activists are pushing the 82-year-old justice to step down.
Plus: U.S. will finally withdraw troops from Afghanistan, Mastercard caves to religious groups on porn, and more...
The Supreme Court reaffirms that COVID-19 regulations must comply with the First Amendment.
The majority reminds the 9th Circuit that the First Amendment puts limits on COVID-19 policies.
Drawn from William Eskridge and Christopher Riano's comprehensive new book on the subject.
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States will examine “the membership and size of the Court.”
It's a genuinely bipartisan and cross-ideological group. And one that isn't good news for advocates of court-packing.
In this he echoes a number of other liberals, including the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
A liberal justice throws cold water on a pet progressive cause
A moot case about Trump blocking tweets leads to concerns that tech companies have too much control over speech.
Today's grant of certiorari in Brown v. Davenport suggests we will see yet another Supreme Court reversal of a Sixth Circuit grant of a habeas petition.
While overturning Roe v. Wade would lead to new restrictions in many states, legal access to abortion would be unaffected in most of the country.
This morning's summary reversal of a habeas petition grant in Mays v. Hines.
"The application of physical force to the body with the intent to restrain is a seizure, even if the person does not submit and is not subdued."
In two decisions today, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh aligned with the Court's liberals.
“There was no immediate danger,” Sotomayor said, yet the police “decided on their own to go in and seize the gun.”
According to the dissent, the appeals court "has decided that the Second Amendment does not mean what it says."
My article considers the implications of a major takings case currently before the Supreme Court.
In this post, I consider some additional issues that came up in the recent Supreme Court oral argument in an important takings case.
The Court seems likely to rule in favor of property rights in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid.
President Joe Biden campaigned on ending the federal death penalty, but he’s been quiet about it since taking office.
Another way to understand what originalists are doing.
A federal judge protests the Supreme Court’s “rights-without-remedies” Bivens doctrine.
Experts disagree on whether this is likely or not. The answer remains unclear. But, either way, reform advocates should pursue both litigation and legislative reform. The two approaches are mutually reinforcing, not mutually exclusive.
Presenting an alternative view as a minority witness before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Supreme Court delivers another blow to a victim of egregious police abuse.
The federal government weighs in on Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L..
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson denied qualified immunity to the officers involved in Patterson v. United States.
A broad coalition of groups is asking the Supreme Court to overturn the state's policy.
More criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, and civil rights litigators may soon be appointed to the federal bench.
The Ending Qualified Immunity Act of 2021 would no longer let state actors violate your rights without consequence.
A phone in your pocket may as well be a GPS beacon strapped to your ankle.
The justices did not address one of James King's key arguments, which the 6th Circuit will now consider.
The justice weighs in during oral arguments in Lange v. California.
They need not wait for the Supreme Court or Congress to restrict or abolish qualified immunity.
An encouraging sign from the Supreme Court
Thomas is right that the doctrine is a mess. But the Court may not be in any hurry to clean it up.