Mercatus Center Study Documents Progress on Housing Reform
Many states have enacted laws curbing exclusionary zoning and other regulations that block new housing construction.
Many states have enacted laws curbing exclusionary zoning and other regulations that block new housing construction.
The Church of the Rock is suing, arguing that the zoning crackdown in Castle Rock violates the First Amendment.
Notre Dame law Prof. Patrick Reidy argues that religious organizations are entitled to faith-based exemptions from zoning restrictions preventing them from building affordable housing on their land.
The state cut down private fruit trees and offered gift cards as compensation. It didn't solve the citrus canker problem.
The close 4-3 decision might well become a staple of textbooks.
There is a growing movement to let churches and other religious organizations build housing on their property that would otherwise be banned by zoning regulations.
Plus: unpermitted ADUs in San Jose, Sen. J.D. Vance's mass deportation plan for housing affordability, and the California Coastal Commission's anti-housing record.
It is coauthored with Josh Braver.
Recent studies diverge on the extent to which public opinion backs policies that would deregulate housing construction. YIMBYs would do well to learn from both.
A guest post on economist Bryan Caplan's Bet On It substack.
Plus: An interview with Colorado Gov. Jared Polis about the state's blockbuster year for housing reform.
Moving is no longer a viable way to grow your wealth in the U.S., says the author of Build, Baby, Build.
Plus: The results of rent control are in, California's tiny home program gets minimal results, and yet another city eyes a crackdown on short-term rentals.
Exclusionary zoning that targets housing gets more attention. But a new study highlights how restrictions on commercial uses also cause great harm.
The decision exemplifies a longstanding issue in legal theory. It also highlights the absurdity of zoning rules.
A listing of his four posts on different aspects of the book and the issues it raises.
Specificity, fertility, and political assimilation. Fourth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
The Institute for Justice has launched a project to reform land use regulation.
Privatization of federal and state land is a massive missed opportunity. Second in a series of guest-blogging posts.
The book makes the case for massively deregulating housing markets.
But Justice Neil Gorsuch's concurring opinion suggests the Court may curb asset forfeiture in the future.
The cars of two Alabama women were seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners. The Supreme Court says they had no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing.
The George Mason University economist talks about his new housing comic book and how America could deregulate its way into an affordable urban utopia.
The Show Me State has plenty of room to rein in laws on taking private property, but instead, lawmakers are focusing only on one very narrow use case.
Plus: California's landmark law ending single-family-only zoning is struck down, Austin, Texas, moves forward with minimum lot size reform, and the pro-natalist case for pedestrian infrastructure.
Homeowners associations are the most, and the least, libertarian form of governance.
The Eighth Amendment provides little, if any, protection for the homeless. But courts can help them by striking down exclusionary zoning, which is the major cause of housing shortages that lead to homelessness.
It's a good idea that will hopefully be imitiated by our allies.
Which is bad news for anyone hoping to rent a place to live.
Giving kidney donors a $50,000 tax credit isn't as good as full legalization of organ markets would be. But it would still be a major step in the right direction.
Ethan Blevins of the Pacific Legal Foundation explains why. I myself have made similar arguments.
Economist Bryan Caplan, former National Association of Home Builders Director Jerry Howard, and I will speak at event sponsored by the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.
Kansas had among the most lax civil asset forfeiture laws in the country, but a bill sent to the governor's desk would strengthen protections for property owners.
The Court allows takings suit against Texas to proceed under state law, but doesn't resolve question of whether the Takings Clause is "self-executing."
Plus: Zoning reform in Minnesota stalls, a New York housing "deal" does little for housing supply, and Colorado ends occupancy limits.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
The decision is unanimous, though some related issues have been left for later resolution.
Sandy Martinez faces that bill because of driveway cracks, a storm-damaged fence, and cars parked on her own property that illegally touched her lawn.
Moratoria caused landlords to be less willing to rent to black tenants.
The case raises an important issue about what qualifies as a "pretextual" taking. It's a rare takings issue on which I don't have a clear position.
Urban policy analyst Addison Del Mastro advances it in the Catholic journal America.
New Zealand alleviated a severe housing shortage by liberalizing regulations that had previously blocked most new construction.
In interview with Joe Selvaggi of the Pioneer Institute, I explain the harm caused by exclusionary zoning, and why it violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Too many property owners are having trouble asserting their rights, but not everything is "squatter's rights."
Plus: Gun detection in the subway system, Toronto's rainwater tax, goat wet nurses, and more...
Thanks to "squatters' rights" laws, evicting a squatter can be so expensive and cumbersome that some people simply walk away from their homes.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10