Essay on "How Constitutional Litigation Can Help End Exclusionary Zoning"
A guest post on economist Bryan Caplan's Bet On It substack.
A guest post on economist Bryan Caplan's Bet On It substack.
Plus: An interview with Colorado Gov. Jared Polis about the state's blockbuster year for housing reform.
Moving is no longer a viable way to grow your wealth in the U.S., says the author of Build, Baby, Build.
Plus: The results of rent control are in, California's tiny home program gets minimal results, and yet another city eyes a crackdown on short-term rentals.
Exclusionary zoning that targets housing gets more attention. But a new study highlights how restrictions on commercial uses also cause great harm.
The decision exemplifies a longstanding issue in legal theory. It also highlights the absurdity of zoning rules.
A listing of his four posts on different aspects of the book and the issues it raises.
Specificity, fertility, and political assimilation. Fourth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
The Institute for Justice has launched a project to reform land use regulation.
Privatization of federal and state land is a massive missed opportunity. Second in a series of guest-blogging posts.
The book makes the case for massively deregulating housing markets.
But Justice Neil Gorsuch's concurring opinion suggests the Court may curb asset forfeiture in the future.
The cars of two Alabama women were seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners. The Supreme Court says they had no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing.
The George Mason University economist talks about his new housing comic book and how America could deregulate its way into an affordable urban utopia.
The Show Me State has plenty of room to rein in laws on taking private property, but instead, lawmakers are focusing only on one very narrow use case.
Plus: California's landmark law ending single-family-only zoning is struck down, Austin, Texas, moves forward with minimum lot size reform, and the pro-natalist case for pedestrian infrastructure.
Homeowners associations are the most, and the least, libertarian form of governance.
The Eighth Amendment provides little, if any, protection for the homeless. But courts can help them by striking down exclusionary zoning, which is the major cause of housing shortages that lead to homelessness.
It's a good idea that will hopefully be imitiated by our allies.
Which is bad news for anyone hoping to rent a place to live.
Giving kidney donors a $50,000 tax credit isn't as good as full legalization of organ markets would be. But it would still be a major step in the right direction.
Ethan Blevins of the Pacific Legal Foundation explains why. I myself have made similar arguments.
Economist Bryan Caplan, former National Association of Home Builders Director Jerry Howard, and I will speak at event sponsored by the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.
Kansas had among the most lax civil asset forfeiture laws in the country, but a bill sent to the governor's desk would strengthen protections for property owners.
The Court allows takings suit against Texas to proceed under state law, but doesn't resolve question of whether the Takings Clause is "self-executing."
Plus: Zoning reform in Minnesota stalls, a New York housing "deal" does little for housing supply, and Colorado ends occupancy limits.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
The decision is unanimous, though some related issues have been left for later resolution.
Sandy Martinez faces that bill because of driveway cracks, a storm-damaged fence, and cars parked on her own property that illegally touched her lawn.
Moratoria caused landlords to be less willing to rent to black tenants.
The case raises an important issue about what qualifies as a "pretextual" taking. It's a rare takings issue on which I don't have a clear position.
Urban policy analyst Addison Del Mastro advances it in the Catholic journal America.
New Zealand alleviated a severe housing shortage by liberalizing regulations that had previously blocked most new construction.
In interview with Joe Selvaggi of the Pioneer Institute, I explain the harm caused by exclusionary zoning, and why it violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Too many property owners are having trouble asserting their rights, but not everything is "squatter's rights."
Plus: Gun detection in the subway system, Toronto's rainwater tax, goat wet nurses, and more...
Thanks to "squatters' rights" laws, evicting a squatter can be so expensive and cumbersome that some people simply walk away from their homes.
Where these laws allow squatters to occupy houses without the owner's consent, they qualify as takings of private property that require payment of compensation under the Fifth Amendment.
Plus: New York refreshes rent control, AOC and Bernie Sanders call for more, greener public housing, and California's "builder's remedy" wins big in court.
Plus: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is fooled by TikTok housing falsehoods, Austin building boom cuts prices, and Sacramento does the socialist version of "homeless homesteading."
The New York Times and the Atlantic report on how the movement to curb exclusionary zoning and build more housing has managed to cut across ideological lines.
They are to be commended. But other property owners should also be freed of exclusionary zoning.
The Institute for Justice says its data show that a century-old Supreme Court doctrine created a huge exception to the Fourth Amendment.
The Colorado governor talks about live housing reforms in the state legislature, the federal role in housing policy, and whether we should abolish zoning completely.
Prominent political commentator and zoning reform advocate comments on my work on this topic (with Joshua Braver).
A lawsuit from the Institute for Justice claims the law violates the Louisiana Constitution.