South Korea Thinks About Acquiring Nuclear Weapons. Good?
Nuclear proliferation could be good for peace-and not relying on the U.S. for security certainly would be.
Nuclear proliferation could be good for peace-and not relying on the U.S. for security certainly would be.
Stooping to the level of North Korean bluster is both unnecessary and reckless.
State Department also announced review of deal-related sanctions suspensions.
Friday A/V Club: The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is posting declassified footage of atomic tests on YouTube.
The U.S. is warning North Korea to denuclearize or else.
Last night Trump's foreign policy mouth seemed in some cases to be outrunning his mind, making a strict interpretation of his meaning difficult.
America needn't apologize, but must consider who has his finger on the button.
It wasn't perfect, but the alternatives are much worse.
Media darling John Kasich wants to take out North Korea, too
Wars are getting rarer and nuclear stockpiles are going down.
A hydrogen bomb would represent a step up from the less-powerful nuclear technology North Korea had relied on previously.
Increasingly sophisticated homemade guns are so entrenched cops fear their use by organized crime, so now let's fret over desktop weapons of mass destruction.
And can those who call Iran the Axis of Evil be too surprised at being called the Great Satan?
Iran can reportedly use its own experts to inspect sites where weapons research was alleged to have taken place.
The ravages of Hiroshima; the misery of unfunny summer comedies
Iran has not been seeking a nuclear bomb.
The Holocaust: Not just for Planned Parenthood anymore!
On Trump, Jon Stewart, Mike Huckabee, Iran, and A.I. deathbots
The Obama administration, of course, is amenable.
Criticism of presidential treaties with adversarial governments goes back a long way.
Hawks have nothing better to propose except more huffing and puffing
Iran is not the only threat here. Our own hubris is equally dangerous.
The hawks have no better alternatives for stopping Iran's march toward a nuclear bomb
Diplomacy is the only remotely effective option for curbing Iran's nuclear program
Back in 1986, the then-senator led the charge against Ronald Reagan's treatment of South Africa
Arms control tends to bring out unwarranted panic and fury, and Netanyahu is squarely in that tradition.
Netanyahu's narrative is a fabric of lies and omissions.
Such an accord would shelve the option of attacking Iran, a longtime dream of neoconservatives.
Also insists Iran is not building a nuclear bomb and ducks questions about arrests for a Youtube video, Washington Post journalists, and a 25 year-old woman watching a volleyball game.
The CIA and Pentagon feared their budgets and staffs would be slashed with the end of the Cold War, and needed a new antagonist.
U.S. hawks aren't telling the full story about Iran's agenda.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10