Have Trump's Tariffs Brought Manufacturing Jobs Back to America? New Study Says No.
However, the tariffs did shift supply chains away from China and towards other countries with low-cost manufacturing, like Vietnam, Malaysia, and India.
However, the tariffs did shift supply chains away from China and towards other countries with low-cost manufacturing, like Vietnam, Malaysia, and India.
“The sale of E15 year-round would help the ethanol industry and no one else,” says one agricultural policy expert.
A new study highlights the power of zero-sum thinking as a determinant of political views - and also should lead some to rethink immigration.
The narrow geography of the 50-mile Central American isthmus made it an obvious choice for trade routes between the Atlantic and Pacific.
The burden of Trump's illegal tariffs was spread across the American economy. The refunds likely won't cover all those costs.
Globalization helped make everyone else much richer, too.
Before joining the Trump administration last year, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer lobbied for tariffs that limited fertilizer imports and drove up prices for American farmers.
America gets 90 percent of its fresh tomatoes from Mexico, and those imports were tariff-free until last year.
New study finds that tariffs were responsible for the "entirety of the excess inflation in the core goods category."
After walking out of peace talks in Pakistan, the U.S. and Iran are now playing a game of chicken.
The outcome is unclear. But the judges seemed skeptical of the Trump Administration's claims that Section 122 grants them sweeping tariff powers.
The Court of International Trade is weighing the legality of the import taxes that the president wants to impose under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Any time government has greater control over commerce, there is an increased incentive to buy off officials or lobby for special treatment.
From trade to migration to personal freedom, the conservatives of the global New Right hold a philosophy incompatible with individualism.
I submitted the brief on behalf of the Cato Institute and myself.
The reversal wasn't because the economics changed. It is because their biggest shareholders turned toward industrial policy.
Consider it a boozy, tariff-themed version of "I, Pencil."
Plus: back to the moon, one year since "Liberation Day," birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court, Jonathan lives, and more...
The Trump administration keeps trying to find legal loopholes, but the will of the people is the final judge of any major policy.
There was little rhyme or reason to the president's "emergency" tariffs, which fluctuated wildly depending on his mood.
A brash bid to reassert U.S. dominance is delivering short-term wins. But a region tired of being pushed around may not stay compliant for long.
Rep. Jimmy Panetta says Democrats have "learned the hard way" that handing over so much tariff authority to the executive branch is a bad idea.
The president and his new DHS secretary are enraged by jurists and legislators who refuse to toe the party line.
America once dominated the rare-earth market, but permitting requirements are holding the industry back.
The Trump administration has issued a 60-day waiver of a federal law that limits the number of ships allowed to carry goods between American ports.
That’s roughly 12 whole days of government spending.
About 30 percent of the world's helium supply depends on the Strait of Hormuz. Its closure means higher prices for tech manufacturing and advanced medical care.
By the administration's logic, Iowa is hurting Arizona by producing so much corn. This is a very silly way to think about economic policy.
The president’s invocation of Section 122 conflates a trade deficit with a balance-of-payments deficit.
The century-old law makes energy more expensive even when there isn't a war raging in the Middle East.
LJC is the group with which I worked on the IEEPA tariff case decided by the Supreme Court.
Plus: A seventh American has been killed in the Iran conflict, the U.S. is almost certainly responsible for school strike, how Lindsey Graham helped start the war, and more...
The lawsuit, filed by attorneys general and governors from 24 states, claims that Trump is once again trying "to usurp the taxing power that the Constitution vests in Congress."
The massive new tariffs are illegal, just like the IEEPA tariffs previously invalidated by the Supreme Court.
Even if the refunds are made, business owners say they won't cover all the additional costs created by Trump's chaotic trade policies.
Plus: Congress shrugs, a cat cafe unionizes, and Liz Wolfe checks in, and more...
The Trump administration is trying to avoid paying refunds after illegally collecting $175 billion from its emergency tariff scheme.
I was one of the participants, along with Zach Shemtob (SCOTUSblog) and Julie SIlverbrook (NCC).
Gregg Nunziata interviewed me.
American businesses and consumers absorbed nearly 90 percent of the 2025 tariffs' economic burden, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found.
Plus: Minnesota Medicaid funds, AI vs. jobs, Taylor Lorenz's libertarian moment, and more...
It said that if it lost in court, it would refund companies that paid unlawful tariffs. Now it says the process could take years.
Only time will tell how great the impact of the ruling will really be. But, at this point, it seems like a very significant decision.
Although Trump has other options for taxing imports, the justices reminded him that he needs clear congressional authorization.
And that's especially true if the tariffs are illegal.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.