Federal Workers Warned Against Talk of 'Impeachment,' 'the Resistance'
How much does the Hatch Act cover?
How much does the Hatch Act cover?
Killing Section 230 would only lead web platforms to ban even more speech.
It is unconstitutional for the government to discriminate against organizations based on their viewpoint.
A federal judge overturns a state ban on telling customers they can bring their own beer or wine.
Nadine Strossen, Eugene Volokh, and Stephanie Slade discuss freedom of speech, assembly, and religion at Reason's 50th anniversary.
"I'm treated no differently from a common felon on parole."
The case, which pits Trump against the network he loves to criticize, has raised First Amendment concerns.
What should the culture of free speech, free expression, and ownership look like on our social media platforms?
Plus: the NRA versus New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and CNN versus the White House
"Any other result would have undermined the free speech and academic freedom rights of all Rutgers faculty members."
Believe it or not, authorities can maintain the peace while also respecting the First Amendment.
Plus: Trump endorses sentencing reform and Bitcoin's value continues to fall.
How indie media entrepreneurs James Larkin and Michael Lacey became the targets of a federal witchhunt.
Why both the dissent and majority in Janus were wrong, and what the next lawsuits may look like.
The organization's lawsuit against New York's governor survives a motion to dismiss.
New York's governor is violating the First Amendment by pressuring banks and insurers to shun "gun promotion organizations."
Banning ballot selfies to stop voter fraud is like "burning down the house to roast the pig" said the First Circuit Court of Appeals. But many states still do it.
Jim Rutenberg's indictment of "the Incitement Industry" charges right-wing provocateurs with complicity in violence.
A city ordinance let officers harass women as part of a licensing inspection process. A judge ruled it unconstitutional.
A decade of surveillance from the civil rights era makes a technology and social-media-fueled return.
The president, who routinely threatens to sue people for saying things he does not like, deployed an anti-SLAPP law in his own defense.
The best answer to speech we don't like is: more speech.
Mayor Ted Wheeler's proposed ordinance raises "constitutional concerns," says Oregon ACLU.
Plus: libertarian accounts purged from Facebook?
The irony is that she's protesting authoritarian police behavior.
"Actively counter islamophobic, algorithmically biased results from search terms 'Islam', 'Muslim', 'Iran', etc."
Student journalists at a Vermont high school had a damning article censored by their interim principal.
Florida prisons completely ban Prison Legal News magazine. Now the publication is asking the Supreme Court to "vindicate the First Amendment."
Sen. Kamala Harris tried to limit the storefront speech of firearms sellers as California attorney general.
Critiquing an ex-president's warnings about anti-media rhetoric, non-voting, and unelected bureaucrats
Before demanding censure or intervention, take a step back from the Twitter machine and ask yourself whether anyone really cares about this stuff.
The Slants speak with Reason a year after winning the right to use their own name.
Uncensored author and new college grad Zachary R. Wood explains why his generation is so scared of viewpoint diversity.
A judge ruled in May that the First Amendment means we all should be able to see government officials' social media accounts.
Referencing Shakespeare, the Bible, and American colonial times, a federal court rules in favor of a group's right to feed the homeless.
A state law says you can't call it meat unless it's actually beef, pork, or poultry. Critics say the bill violates the First Amendment.
Prosecutors have declined to file charges against the officer.
"Okay, officially, I now hate white people" is a gross statement that deserves First Amendment protection.
Matt Welch interviews Brown (and others, including ex-Reasoner Lauren Krisai) from 9-12 ET.
Far from undermining freedom of the press, the president's fulminations prove its durability.
The bill makes "promoting prostitution" a federal crime, holds websites legally liable for user-posted content, and lets states retroactively prosecute offenders.
"Congress has spoken on this matter and it is for Congress, not this court, to revisit." Except for maybe later this afternoon...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10