4 Bad Arguments for Trump's New Tariffs
When it comes to trade, the president believes a lot of nonsense.
When it comes to trade, the president believes a lot of nonsense.
Senator tells Reason "most of the businesses in Kentucky are quite worried about a trade war." But will a weak Congress confront Trump?
John Stossel says voluntary, free trade improves lives.
Senior policy adviser is a walking conflict of interest playing way out of his depth. But is that reason enough to make his Arab-world dealings subject to the Mueller investigation?
Making drug-company shareholders foot the bill for a public health crisis is flaky and counterproductive.
The proposed tariffs are an exercise in ego, not economics.
President's hasty new "trade war" will damage the American economy while continuing his process of removing tariff-reduction from two-party politics.
No, Call of Duty is not making kids shoot up schools.
He's made the party's economic agenda an extension of the culture wars.
And they'll make lots of other things more expensive too.
Trump's embrace of gun control is consistent with his views before he ran for president.
And throws a bipartisan sentencing reform bill under the bus.
This from a guy who bemoaned the lack of due process just weeks ago.
Since the accessories are legal, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is helping the president rewrite the law.
He should make a peace offering to Congress now or suffer midterm losses.
The president has never encountered a problem he can't imagine solving with violence.
Argues that secret wiretap authorizations were not abused.
Tariffs are an unnecessary step that will hurt American manufacturers and increase prices on a wide range of products, from cars to beer cans.
Trump's infrastructure proposal includes $20 billion for projects like the Hyperloop.
A total of 32 claims of tax and bank fraud in concealing foreign income.
Attacking violent video games is useless political theater.
A screening system can be "comprehensive" without being smart, fair, or effective.
Mileage-based user fees would charge drivers for how much road they use, not how much fuel they burn.
The gun-control consensus that is forming should be particularly troubling to "mentally ill" Americans and skeptics of unrestrained police power.
The president showed empathy, engagement, and leadership in a way that will surprise many of his critics and supporters alike.
The once obscure device may not be long for this world.
Alex Van Der Zwaan's plea is latest criminal case to come out of Robert Mueller's investigation.
Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, Robby Soave and Nick Gillespie talk gun violence, immigration politics, Russian electoral interference, and Black Panther.
The way to achieve peace is not to prepare for war but to reject militarism and empire, and embrace nonintervention.
Four questions to ask yourself before you freak out about Trump's latest tweet
Thirteen individuals and three companies accused of conspiracy against the U.S., wire fraud, and identity theft.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that the ban violates the First Amendment because it is intended to discriminate against Muslims.
The president's plan would slash legal immigration by as much as half, the most drastic cut in nearly a century.
The president's gift underscores how little consumers of road and rail pay for the infrastructure they use.
The era of big government is far from over.
Whatever else the Trump Administration is (or is not) doing, it continues to announce excellent judicial nominees for federal appellate courts - while showing it's capable of working with Democratic Senators.
One bright spot in Donald Trump's very bad, very insane budget plan is his willingness to cut taxpayer-funded culture.
Members of both parties will fight tooth and nail to preserve their transportation pork.
The plan would see $200 billion in new federal spending, but it would also open up opportunities for private infrastructure investment.
An autopsy for the brief limited-government era of conservatism that ended on Friday
Stanford political scientist Morris Fiorina says it's media and political elites who live in ideological bubbles, not regular Americans.
The interference seems inconsistent with the president's support for cannabis as a medicine.
At some point, maybe we should just take Trump's antics as a given
"Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation."
Trump's awful rhetoric is a menace to liberty - even when it does not lead to any immediate action.