Chuck Schumer

The Two Parties Are Awful on Almost Everything Important

Be very afraid when Chuck Schumer reaches across the aisle to shower praise on President Trump

|

Hey, we had a good run. ||| JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS/Newscom
JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS/Newscom

Today, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average was well on its way to a 700+-point drop, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) reached across the aisle in support of the very policy that was spooking investors: the Trump administration's embrace of trade wars, particularly against the backstabbing Chinese.

"I don't agree with President Trump on a whole lot, but today I want to give him a big pat on the back. He is doing the right thing when it comes to China," Schumer said on the Senate floor, in comments that could easily be cut-and-pasted into a Trump campaign speech. "We have watched China rapaciously take advantage of America—of American jobs, of American workers, and of American intellectual property. China's ruthless in how they go after us: They do it quietly, they do it with a smile. And unfortunately, the previous presidents, Democrat and Republican, just stood by as China did what it did to us. President Trump is exactly right."

The proximate cause for Schumer's enthusiasm was Trump's announcement this afternoon that the U.S. would be slapping tariffs on as many as 1,300 Chinese products, while limiting China-based companies from purchasing American technology companies. The White House claims concurrently that the duties will impact $60 billion worth of goods yet have a "minimal impact" on American consumers. (As always, check out the Twitter feed of trade lawyer and Cato Institute adjunct Scott Lincicome for the ins and outs of the new rule.)

||| Reason
Reason

But there's a broader truth behind Schumer's grin. However this November shakes out, his party—and potentially the cereal killer himself—will have considerably more power than now. And in Trump, Democrats have a willing partner for some of their worst policy ideas, from trade to spending to anti-speech sex panics.

In fact, given how much Trump is helping transform the ideologies of both the GOP grassroots and its spineless elite (today's money Trumpism from the formerly free-trading vice president: "The era of economic surrender is over"), it's long since past time to recognize a glaring truth about two-party politics in 2018: In both effective practice and, increasingly, aspirational rhetoric, there are no significant Republican or Democratic voting blocs on Capitol Hill in favor of reducing deficits, restraining government growth, tackling entitlements, protecting privacy, defending free speech, practicing transparency, challenging prohibition, conducting legislative-branch oversight, passing damn budgets, reducing war, or extending the post–World War II America-led system of reducing global tariffs in the name of both prosperity and peace.

These are among the most important issues facing the country, and the two major parties are currently awful on all of them.

This is not a nihilistic, equal-pox-on-both-houses observation. In an era of increasing polarization, it's ignorant to pretend that the parties (and as importantly, their customers) are the same. On abortion, immigration, guns, and plenty besides, there has been a great divergence, particularly in recent years.

But when we return to trillion-dollar deficits and pivot toward trillion-dollar debt-service bills without causing much more than a ripple of public fuss, it's worth stepping back and wondering where the fiscal-sanity bloc will land after our current political re-sorting. It won't take many more 700-point drops to focus people's attention and call into question whether the long, sluggish economic recovery is coming to a close. There is still muscle memory in this country about the virtues of government living within its means; it remains to be seen where that will find expression in a Trump-Schumer world.

Advertisement

NEXT: Civilization Is Doomed, Says Stanford Biologist Paul Ehrlich (Again)

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Be fair. They’re both awful on a lot of unimportant stuff, too.

    1. You’re full of shit. I think they’re both just awful.

      1. A fact that is implied by what i said, clownshoes.

        1. You don’t go far enough, dingbat. You lefties are too afraid to call a spade a spade.

            1. I got paid $10438 a month ago by working on the web. Its a simple online activity to do and winning is more and superior to anything the general office work. I have discovered this activity a half year prior and begins gaining in my first month effortlessly. Everyone must attempt this activity at the present time by simply reorder the beneath site in program and afterward take after next subtle elements to begin procuring right now look here more

              http://www.richdeck.com

          1. Only fags ‘imply’ stuff.

            1. Says the hate-spewing right-wing homophobe.
              How many MORE contards will fuck up Citizen X’s opening comment? (smirk)

              For any other goobers — they run in packs here — he said that both parties were awful on “unimportant stuff, too.” Umm, the title says both parties are awful on IMPORTANT STUFF.

              But the asswipes will “stand together” for at least a dozen more dumbfuck comments — their pack mentality, bellowing blowhards all.

              1. Shut your whore mouth Hihn. Why don’t you just leave the country and go found your perfect Trapnostate and leave the rest of us alone!

                1. Left – Right = Zero

                  Which is why God created libertarians to ridicule you both for a half century (and counting)

                  1. Go ridicule me from the Trapnostate, which is where you belong!

                    1. I just want you to repeat your dumbfuck claim that I’m a liberal.
                      To you goobers , there are only homophobic bigots, like yourself, or liberals.

                      Meanwhile, your time has expired,
                      Libertarians have been here for 50 years,
                      And over 60% of Americans would self-describe as fiscally conservative and socially liberal.

                      Left – Right = Zero

  2. “The Two Parties Are Awful on Almost Everything Important”

    Going out on a limb, are we?

  3. A 700 point drop in a Dow at 24,000 is less than half the total loss percentage as the 190 point drop on Black Friday in ’89.

    Putting out the delta of the loss without putting it in context of the whole marjet valuatuon is bad practice, if not fearmongering

    1. If markets don’t use fearmongering, how would they function?

    2. It is the same trick CNN uses , display a large box of indexes on the screen when the market “plunges” , and a tiny box to show gains.

    3. well, we’ve had ~11% drop since late January.

      1. ~10% if I plug in numbers down to the decimal point.

        1. Craven wingers suck up to the morally bankrupt GOP.
          Again.
          Still.

      2. Well, in all fairness the stock market is wildly overvalued. If it has a slow, steady correction things could surely be a lot worse.

    4. A 700 point drop in a Dow at 24,000 is less than half the total loss percentage as the 190 point drop on Black Friday in ’89.

      Who said or implied otherwise, Chicken Little?

    5. Putting out the delta of the loss without putting it in context of the whole marjet valuatuon is bad practice, if not fearmongering

      That might be true if the market itself wasn’t manipulated now. But it is being manipulated now – and the main way it is being manipulated is in the amount of daily/intraday volatility that is allowed. For a couple years now, that allowable volatility has been the lowest in history (2nd lowest was a couple years in the early 1960’s). So the only ‘good practice’ measure now is today’s up/down v ‘normal’ days up/down.

      1. But it is being manipulated now – and the main way it is being manipulated is in the amount of daily/intraday volatility that is allowed. For a couple years now, that allowable volatility has been the lowest in history

        Ummm, stock volatility — the net amount of both up and down changes — resuts from MILLIONS of individual decisions — each investor buys or sells based the market price(s) of his or her investments. Hint: they ALL hope to buy at the bottom and sell at the top. When WIDE swings occur, there is optimism or pessimism on OVERALL market conditions. LOW swings are unanimity on either optimism or pessimism.

        Conspiracy nuts not withstanding.

        To JSlave and his cohorts, EVERYTHING they don’t understand causes them to invent a new conspiracy, exactly as early humans invented a god to explain what THEY could not grasp.

        All such swings have a cause. Some are obvious, like the immediate Crash of 1929 …or the THREE-YEAR decline of 70% starting in the late 70s.

        So, Trumptards sneer at the recent market drop — are also too stupid to have seen the late 70s crash .. BECAUSE they BELEEBED the market had already troughed — as JSlave does today,

        INTELLIGENT humans are properly concerned about a slower repeat of the 1929 Carsh — caused by the Hawlery-Smoot Tariff — but not crazy enough to form a total conclusion, as today’ Trumptian bots are so DESPERATE to do.

        Any questions?

  4. The Schumer Reachacross is a notorious move in the DC area.

    1. It’s not as desirable as the Schumer reach-around.

      1. And let us not forget the odious Schumer Reachunder.

        1. You have to pay him to do that though. That’s how he got the nickname Two Buck Chuck.

  5. What a coincidence. The Republican party urges the death sentence (adding estate libel to asset forfeiture) for potheads and alluva sudden the stock market goes wonky. The Five & Ten making beer a felony as Herbert Hoover took office, plus Internal Revenue forfeiture as enforcement, brought about the Crash of 1929 because investors could clearly see the Depression was inevitable. They pull their money out, credit contracts, liquidity crunch follows. Bush Sr and Waffen Bush demonstrated the same thing in 1987 and 2007. Q.E.D.

    1. The Republican party urges the death sentence (adding estate libel to asset forfeiture) for potheads and alluva sudden the stock market goes wonky.

      It was the tariff. (snort)

      Internal Revenue forfeiture as enforcement, brought about the Crash of 1929

      It IMMEDIATELY followed the Hawley-Smoot Tariff being voted out of committee.

      But Hank Phillips

  6. What a coincidence. The Republican party urges the death sentence (adding estate libel to asset forfeiture) for potheads and alluva sudden the stock market goes wonky. The Five & Ten making beer a felony as Herbert Hoover took office, plus Internal Revenue forfeiture as enforcement, brought about the Crash of 1929 because investors could clearly see the Depression was inevitable. They pull their money out, credit contracts, liquidity crunch follows. Bush Sr and Waffen Bush demonstrated the same thing in 1987 and 2007. Q.E.D.

    1. Holy cow, batman … you’re giving me the heebie jeebies. Will they still serve beer down at Neptune’s when all this shit goes down?

  7. Chuck Schumer, right …. he’s the one that wanted to make it illegal for any US citizen moving to a lower tax domain to EVER return to the US. He never met a tax he didn’t like.

  8. These are among the most important issues facing the country, and the two major parties are currently awful on all of them.

    The libertarian establishment (Cato/Mercatus/Reason Mag) has NOTHING. So Matt is just recycling Trump’s bluster and anti-gubmint gooberism (to largely the same goobers)

    Complaining about a problem, without posing a solution, is whining.
    -Theodore Roosevelt

    1. Okay, the government sucks at everything. Summary execution for 50% of government employees at all levels. Problem solved.

      1. But not my sister.

      2. PROGRESSIVE SAYS — IN PUBLIC — THAT GOVERNMENT IS OKAY WITH HIM, UNLESS AND UNTIL IT EXECUTES 50% OF ITS EMPLOYEES!

        Umm, what does your whining have to do with the libertarian establishment having NO CREDIBLE POLICY SOLUTIONS …FOR ANYTHING?

        Complaining about a problem, without posing a solution, is whining.
        -Theodore Roosevelt

  9. Matt stops short of saying Ds and Rs are exactly equal, but I think they are farther apart than he indicates.

    The Rs at least have groups like the libertarian-ish Republican Liberty Caucus and it appears the only people calling the pile of shit spending bill out specifically for spending (rather than not spending more) are (a small group of) Republicans.

    To see this headline, and then other headlines with (Republican) Rand Paul fighting the bill…well, it doesn’t make sense.

    Obviously, the RLC is small and the establishment has the reigns, but I see no comparable group for individual liberty (broadly defined) and fiscal responsibility on the Ds side.

    Or did I miss one ?

    1. Matt stops short of saying Ds and Rs are exactly equal,

      His point is libertarian, which confuses you people.

      Or did I miss one?

      Three
      1) Confuse Paul with libertarianism
      2) Confuse the RLC with libertarians,
      3) Confuse babbling and theories with actual legislation. (The road to hell is filled with … what? )

      Are you in the Paulista Cult?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.