Trump Can Take Revenge on the 'Deep State': Pardon Snowden
Why Edward Snowden deserves not only a presidential pardon, but a hero's welcome home.
Why Edward Snowden deserves not only a presidential pardon, but a hero's welcome home.
When Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick is worried about our constitutional order, we should all pay heed.
In 2018, Trump hailed a trade deal with South Korea as "fair and reciprocal" and said it was "a historic milestone in trade." So much for that.
Yet another wasteful expense in the "big, beautiful bill."
The taxes on sound suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns, originally enacted in 1934, were meant to be prohibitive, imposing bans in the guise of raising revenue.
The ban is a bad law. But leaving it on the books and willfully ignoring it sets a potentially more dangerous precedent.
Several of the items on the Declaration's list of grievances against King George III also apply to Donald Trump today.
Class actions and Administrative Procedure Act claims can achieve much the same result as the nationwide orders that the Supreme Court rejected.
Americans will continue to pay higher tariffs, while Vietnamese businesses won't pay anything. Whatever happened to reciprocity?
Our dreams have fallen from supersonic world travel to jailing migrants who've hurt no one.
Plus: Trade deal with Vietnam, Romanian right-wing presidential candidate sent to trial, and more...
But, notably, the court chose not to rule on the issue of what qualifies as an "invasion."
The organization was unfair to female competitors, was unfair to Lia Thomas, and handed the Trump administration a win on a silver platter.
The company's surrender to Trump's extortion vindicates his strategy of using frivolous litigation and his presidential powers to punish constitutionally protected speech.
The Justice Department cannot constitutionally prosecute a news outlet for covering the news.
Only eight days after construction began, Florida’s new immigration detention center in the Everglades is set to officially open this week.
Tellingly, the president avoided defending his dubious interpretation of the 14th Amendment at the Supreme Court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit is considering whether the president properly invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged gang members.
The president's cruel and pointless ban on immigration or visits from nationals of 12 countries will have no significant safety benefit for Americans.
Plus: What the socialists don't understand about childcare, the current state of Iran's nuclear capabilities, and more...
Jim Ryan is the latest casualty in Trump's unconstitutional war against elite universities.
Plus: Conservatives won big overall this year at the Supreme Court.
Plus: The anti-socialist moment, muscle-building drugs counteract Ozempic, arsony gunman in Idaho, and more...
Democratic critics of the new program overlook the injustice of permanently disarming Americans who pose no threat to public safety.
“Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch,” declared Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Today's Supreme Court ruling barring nationwide injunctions could empower the federal government to engage in large-scale violations of the Constitution. Exactly how bad the consequences will be depends on the extent to which other remedies can be used to forestall them.
The trade deficit is getting bigger, the deals aren't coming, and foreign investment has declined.
This pivot to privately funded research could reduce the burden on taxpayers and lead to more scientific breakthroughs.
Any decisions made by U.S. Steel's executives and shareholders will require approval from Trump, his appointees, or his successors.
It explains how these much-maligned doctrines can be valuable tools for constraining power grabs by presidents of both parties.
The liberal justice faults the majority for leaving deportees to “suffer violence in far-flung locales.”
Those who pushed for Trump to attack Iran are now moving the goalposts for success.
They are prominent legal scholars and Supreme Court litigators from opposite sides of the political spectrum.
Marco Rubio’s nebulous invocation of foreign policy interests is bound to have a chilling impact on freedom of speech, which is the whole point.
The ruling includes no analysis. Justice Sotomayor's dissent has a compelling explanation of why it is wrong.
Medical school is so expensive in the first place because of a policy that gives medical students unlimited access to loans.
War with Iran was a risky, destructive gamble. But the worst outcome has been avoided, for now.
Plus: Strait of Hormuz possibly closing, NYC's socialist nonsense hopefully coming to a close, and more...
Plus: A criminal justice case that managed to unite Alito and Gorsuch.
The conflict with Iran is the latest in a decadeslong series of regime change operations, long-term entanglements, and all-out wars that always seem to invite more problems.
Plus: The Trump administration toys with regime change in Iran, our own constitutional regime takes another hit, a mystery driver joyrides on the National Mall, and more...
The strikes violate both the Constitution and the 1973 War Powers Act. Whether they are good policy is a more difficult question. This could turn out to be a rare instance where one of Trump's illegal actions has beneficial results.
Trump's attack on Iran plainly violates the War Powers Act. Limits on executive power are most important when they are inconvenient.
The attack on Iranian nuclear sites is a risky gamble. And it was completely by choice.
Iranians are already beginning to flee to neighboring countries.
The ruling gets several important issues right - and one big one wrong.
Although the appeals court said the president probably complied with the law he invoked to justify his California deployment, it emphasized that such decisions are subject to judicial review.