My New Lawfare Article on "The Constitutional Case Against Trump's Trade War"
It explains why the IEEPA "Liberation Day" tariffs are illegal and how our case against them relates to the other three cases challenging Trup's tariffs.
It explains why the IEEPA "Liberation Day" tariffs are illegal and how our case against them relates to the other three cases challenging Trup's tariffs.
“The Executive will lose much from a public perception of its lawlessness and all of its attendant contagions.”
Even if Trump were a font of intelligence and wisdom (and he's not), no one person should be directing any country's economy.
Just a quarter of respondents said they favored deporting students for "expressing pro-Palestine views."
Apparently freezing $2 billion in federal funding wasn't enough.
Harvard's law faculty previously criticized the Obama administration's assault on norms of free speech and due process.
The Liberty Justice Center and I filed the case on Monday.
Using the military to wage the drug war in Mexico raises practical and constitutional issues.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg says the evidence indicates that the government "willfully disobeyed" his order blocking removal of alleged Venezuelan gang members.
I was interviewed by Caleb Brown of Cato.
They challenge both the "Liberation Day" IEEPA tariffs, and earlier ones imposed on Canada, Mexico and China.
The cost cutter's current projection of annual "savings" is 85 percent lower than the goal he set two months ago—and even that number can't be trusted.
Businesses are reporting fewer orders, lower inventories, less employment, and weaker expectations. The only thing going up: prices.
Former Obama administration economic adviser Jason Furman explains why both major parties have abandoned economic reality in favor of political fantasy.
A historian tries to tie two classical liberal economists to the racialist right, and scrambles their words in the process.
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected that claim, upholding the right to due process in deportation cases.
The Supreme Court ruled they administration must "facilitate" the return of an illegally deported migrant imprisoned in El Salvador at its behest. They have responded by doing virtually nothing to comply.
Several businesses harmed by Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs have filed a lawsuit challenging his use of emergency economic powers.
No, the Supreme Court did not give Trump free rein in the case of a wrongly deported man.
Richard Nixon infamously drafted an "enemies list" of people he wanted to go after. At least Trump conducts his corruption out in the open.
It was filed today in the US Court of International Trade.
That's the highest total outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and now Congress wants to borrow even more.
Predictions vary as to the ultimate cost, but there’s no doubt that tariffs create economic pain.
It's a good step. But the schools should also file their own lawsuit challenging this awful policy.
They argue the tariffs violate the constitutional separation of powers and their tribal treaty rights.
The Associated Press’s legal victory highlights the limited power presidents and the press have over the creative destruction and spontaneous order of our language.
An immigration judge's decision reinforces the constitutional argument against the law that the secretary of state is invoking.
Trump lost on his most aggressive claims of executive power for the second time in a week.
Daniel Hannan argues that protectionism never works, but that's a lesson that politicians and voters seemingly have to relearn repeatedly.
Unanimous ruling is a big win for immigrant rights. But it does have unfortunate ambiguities.
Even after Trump paused some of his new tariffs for 90 days, we still have the highest average tariffs in over a century and the biggest trade war since the Great Depression. Real relief will only come if Congress or the courts deny Trump the power to do this.
Protectionism in Egypt and Iraq fueled corruption, stagnation, and smuggling—not prosperity.
There were no deals. There were no wins. There was no plan.
The government currently collects revenue in an arbitrary and distortionary manner, with loopholes that benefit special groups.
But 10% tariffs are still being imposed on nearly all countries, without any letup. And we are still moving ahead with our lawsuit challenging them.
In the span of a week, Trump cratered the stock market and brought it much of the way back, with little more than public statements.
This case has crucial implications for the ability of migrants to effectively challenge illegal AEA deportations.
The Supreme Court did not answer two of the biggest legal questions raised by Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act.
The president is politically targeting those he says politically targeted him.
The movie star’s special treatment highlights the injustice of an illogical federal law.
Although the Court lifted an order that temporarily blocked removal of suspected gang members, it unambiguously affirmed their right to judicial review.
Musk is right. Navarro is a socialist with foolish economic views who should never have been put in charge of anything.
Plus: Formula 1, Backyard Baseball, and The Great 8 vs. The Great One.
The Supreme Court oveturns lower court decisions temporarily barring AEA deportations, but also emphasizes that detainees are entitled to due process, and that AEA deportations are subject to judicial review.
Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia was illegally deported and incarcerated in a Salvadoran prison. The Trump administration admits the deportation was illegal, but claims they can't be required to return him.
The Supreme Court has ample precedent to rule against Trump’s trade war.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10