Border Pageantry
Plus: Putin threatens nukes, D.C. mulls a crackdown on theft, Bloomberg blames right-wingers, and more...
Plus: Putin threatens nukes, D.C. mulls a crackdown on theft, Bloomberg blames right-wingers, and more...
The debate is over. Trump's steel tariffs failed.
The justices reframed the question presented in the case and expedited its consideration.
Plus: Balkan begging, California corruption, Russian gravediggers, and more...
But the ruling will be effectively overturned if the federal Supreme Court rules in favor of Trump in the Colorado disqualification case, as seems likely based on the oral argument in that case.
Several justices seemed troubled by an ATF rule that purports to ban bump stocks by reinterpreting the federal definition of machine guns.
Two-thirds of Americans oppose the Alabama ruling that claims frozen embryos are equivalent to children.
"I'm concerned about a Trump-Biden rematch," argues Riedl. "You have two presidents with two of the worst fiscal records of the past 100 years."
Plus: Migrant resettlement, Tom Cotton op-ed scandal, oppressors-in-training, and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors for big picture thoughts on United States foreign policy interventions in other nation states.
His lawyers assert presidential immunity and discretion, criticize an "unconstitutionally vague" statute, and question the special counsel's legal status.
Plus: Adderall shortages, infrastructure lessons, Kanye West, and more...
Despite holding out against a seemingly inevitable Trump nomination, Haley lost in her home state.
My new article in the print issue of Reason on how things could get weird
Where are the fact-checkers and misinformation cops?
The Supreme Court snubbed Sidney Powell and a court orders Mike Lindell to pay up.
Plus: Teen boys go after tampons, Ken Paxton goes after migrant charities, and more...
Neither Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg nor New York Attorney General Letitia James can explain exactly who was victimized by the dishonesty they cite.
Plus: A listener asks if the editors have criteria for what constitutes a good law.
Plus: Catholic funeral for transgender activist, Donald Trump's props, deep tech in El Segundo, and more...
The law that Attorney General Letitia James used to sue the former president does not require proof that anyone was injured by his financial dishonesty.
Despite brazenly lying on financial documents and inventing valuations seemingly out of thin air, Trump's lender did not testify that it would have valued his loans any differently.
The essence of the case, the Manhattan D.A. says, is that Trump "corrupt[ed] a presidential election" by concealing embarrassing information.
True the Vote told a Georgia court that it can't produce any evidence to support claims of widespread ballot fraud in Georgia.
Plus: Moscow subway stations, climate activists souping and glueing, Rachel Dolezal's plight, and more...
The president criticized companies for selling "smaller-than-usual products" whose "price stays the same." But it was his and his predecessor's spending policies that caused the underlying issue.
It’s true that the U.S. pays too much of the continent’s defense bills even as it’s going broke.
When he's on his game, he's still one of the best bullshit detectors in the media.
Plus: A listener asks if the state of Oregon’s policy on drug decriminalization should be viewed as a success.
Most of the justices are clearly inclined to reject a Colorado Supreme Court decision asserting that power under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Plus: RFK Jr.'s Super Bowl ad, New York's war on Airbnbs, Biden's TikToks, and more...
It was a week of bad news for the president. Fortunately for him, he probably won’t remember.
Unlike Biden's conduct, Special Counsel Robert Hur notes, the document-related charges against Trump feature "serious aggravating facts."
There's a reason why Democrats are freaking out over comparative anti-interventionists RFK Jr., Jill Stein, and Cornel West.
The justices might well overrule the Colorado Supreme Court on the grounds that only Congress has power to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Such a ruling would be a serious mistake.
Peter Meijer talks about his run for Senate, his Trump impeachment vote, and possibly competing against Justin Amash on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
Co-blogger Josh Blackman and I debated the case that will be argued before the Supreme Court this morning.
The case raises an issue of high importance and the opinion may contain some loose reasoning.
As the party grows more populist, ethnically diverse, and working class, will Republicans abandon their libertarian economic principles?
The appeals court says it "cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10