The Anti-Slavery Constitution
Tim Sandefur's excellent NRO column
The Democratic presidential field is not interested in your puny restraints on the executive branch.
Hopefully the White House can refrain from creating any new constitutional conundrums for a semester.
Going beyond criticism, the resolution would punish the NRA and its supporters by cutting off contractors with ties to the group.
Plus: millennials are buying homes after all, protecting Pinterest from anti-vaxxers, and more...
Conservatives who argue that the video platform is constrained by the First Amendment are forsaking their constitutional principles.
Nick Tomboulides of U.S. Term Limits says the best way to shrink government is to limit how long legislators can serve.
As part of its ambitious “1619” inquiry into the legacy of slavery, The New York Times revives false 19th century revisionist history about the American founding.
The five Democrats warn that the Court may have to be "restructured" if it keeps making decisions they don't like.
The justices would be abdicating their duty to uphold the Constitution if they let such political considerations decide legal issues.
The Democracy for All Amendment aims to mute some voices so that others can be heard.
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
Plus: Behind the bipartisan war on internet speech, New York "decriminalizes" pot (but you'll still get fined), and more...
His border lawlessness keeps growing
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
An admirable man with a distinguished career as a Supreme Court justice. But also the author of some of the more problematic opinions of his era.
An amendment to this year's military spending bill says the president must go to Congress before launching another war.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
It's an unconventional approach befitting of an unconventional presidential candidate.
Severability doctrine & the ACA findings seem to support Judge O'Connor's ruling
An important element of standing has already been decided by the Court
Understanding NFIB v. Sebelius
The Supreme Court has used this doctrine for many years, including in the recent gerrymandering decision. But it still doesn't actually make any sense.
Despite occasional rhetoric to the contrary, neither conservative nor liberal justices are shy about overruling constitutional precedent they believe to be badly misguided. And that's a good thing.
“Our role is to enforce the Takings Clause as written.”
The Trump appointee is not impressed by the logic of the "dual sovereignty" doctrine: "Really?"
Constitutional law is made by a politically constructed institution
Jamelle Bouie's counterintuitive recommendation would effectively eliminate constitutional limits on elected officials, including Trump and every demagogue who follows him.
An awful lot, but who's counting?
More often than you might think
Depends on who you ask.
A new history of how the U,.S. Supreme Court has defined and enforced the limits of congressional power
From today's opinion by Justice Thomas, for the five more conservative members of the Court, in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt.
"First trimester abortions, which typically require only medication, do not require the onsite presence of a licensed physician."
Following a Reason investigation into Chicago's punitive vehicle impound program, a new lawsuit alleges the practice violates Chicagoans constitutional rights.
Congress should fix its FGM statute—and all the other ones too.
O'Rourke has long been a critic of U.S. intervention abroad.
The ACLU wants the Supreme Court to revisit the notorious qualified immunity doctrine.
Both the libertarian-leaning Republican and the democratic socialist want Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria.
It's wrong any way you slice it.
Revisiting their debate on judicial protection of economic liberty.
Q&A with the co-founder of Institute for Justice about immigration, his legal philosophy, his battles with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and that tattoo.
Plus: Can sex workers ever trust Kamala Harris? Why do teens love Google Docs? And how is Tumblr faring without porn?
The nation's force mustered in service of the nation's will.
An essential distinction for understanding problems vexing the constitutional order
The alternatives suggested by defenders of the monument do not seem much better.
The challenge to a World War I memorial in Maryland illustrates the confusion caused by the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause cases.
It's an attempt to make an end-run around congressional spending authority.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks