U.K. Officials Want Even More Power To Punish You for Being Mean Online
A Scottish man was just convicted for tweeting an insult about a dead person. The authorities already have too much power to censor.
A Scottish man was just convicted for tweeting an insult about a dead person. The authorities already have too much power to censor.
Plus: The #OldProProject, food truck police, and more...
Plus: The ERA returns (again), Rep. Nancy Mace's marijuana mission, and more...
In The Mind of the Censor and the Eye of the Beholder, the legendary First Amendment lawyer exposes the tricks of today's "anti-free speech movement."
Plus: Biden’s dubious arrest record, Supreme Court rules on vaccine mandate, and more...
Plus: Warren versus grocery stores, Cruz versus the FBI, DOJ's new domestic terror unit, why so many people are quitting their jobs, and more...
Social media accounts are windows into your activities, and the cops are watching.
"You could hear they were trying not to laugh."
While this is a problem, it's not one that scrapping Section 230 would solve.
It's a fairly benign thing to say. And yet it's a landmine in our media landscape.
How a generation was redpilled by a nerd power fantasy about defining yourself in the digital age
Gov. Greg Abbott attacks First Amendment rights in the name of defending them.
Why give legacy media a stranglehold over information that Twitter at its best is great for sharing?
It's true that some users spread lies on social media. But this can’t be solved by partisan “fact-checking."
The site's long-serving boss might be more committed to free speech than his successor, Parag Agrawal.
Florida passed a law to stop big tech “censorship.” But the law itself tramples First Amendment rights.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar wants to put HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the former California attorney general with a reputation for being a partisan hack, in charge of "health disinformation" online.
The latest bill to “fight big tech” could turn your online experience into a miserable slog.
TikTok's "devious licks" trend has earned the company and its teen users plenty of scorn. But what's actually going on?
Facebook's rebrand signals that the widely scrutinized company retains lofty ambitions.
A business model where outrage is exploited for clicks describes both social media and the news media.
The First Amendment shields Americans from censorship, but authoritarian legislation in Britain and Canada warns of what could be in store if that protection fails.
The mainstream media's fear of Mark Zuckerberg is not supported by the documents.
When "protecting users' safety" actually means the opposite
"The plaintiffs failed to make out a plausible claim that the Pulse massacre was an act of 'international terrorism' as that term is defined in the ATA."
Plus: America's crackdown on Big Tech gives cover to Russia's crackdown on Big Tech, high inflation likely to continue into next year, and more...
Attempts by British lawmakers to erase online anonymity would lead to radical speech being pushed underground.
Upstart competitors can’t hope to match the resources required to compile a list of banned individuals and organizations.
Tech giants expressing openness to amending Section 230 are doing so out of naked self-interest, not the goodness of their hearts.
"A key part of the control in Cuba is keeping people afraid, keeping them isolated from one another," says Henken. The internet has mitigated this.
Patiently waiting for senators and whistleblowers to freak out over this
Plus: California can't limit private prisons, Yellen dismisses bank privacy concerns, and more...
"Maybe one billionaire with a penchant for destroying democracies shouldn’t be allowed to own so much of the internet," says the representative from New York.
The site is clearly in trouble and the government doesn't need to step in.
"We don't actually do finsta," Antigone Davis, Facebook's head of security, explained.
Young people who came of age after 9/11 aren't snowflakes despite being exposed to a series of catastrophic events and apocalyptic news narratives.
This is where government demands to moderate what users say will ultimately lead.
Political polarization drives social media use, rather than the other way around.
Politicians and activists claim social media is turning us into zombies. But new technologies have been greeted with skepticism since the dawn of time.
Government restrictions on private editorial discretion violate the First Amendment.
Robby Soave doesn't like it when social media deplatforms users, but the far bigger threat comes from lawmakers on a mission.
"It was a mistake among the digital team," says executive director Anthony Romero.
Emma Sarley's employer might come to regret instantly firing her.
No, law enforcement and school officials cannot order students to remove posts about exposure to the coronavirus.
Still, Facebook should not have allowed its VIPs to flout the rules it claimed applied to everyone.
Plus: "The endless catastrophe of Rikers Island," studies link luxury rentals and affordable housing, and more...
Maryland satire paper threatened over "OlneyFans" article, big tech companies "on the butcher's table," and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10