Livestream: Homeland Security's Backdoor Social Media Speech Regulation
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
Plus: For Halloween, the editors describe what scares them most about politics and government right now.
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI regularly report misinformation and disinformation to tech companies for potential removal.
Plus: Charlottesville cracks down on city employee speech, judge dismisses "blackout challenge" lawsuit against TikTok, and more...
In his dismissal order, the judge cited Section 230, the law protecting websites from liability for user-generated content.
Science writer Mick West examines alleged UFO sightings. He finds that they almost always have far more obvious explanations.
Mendel had a history of run-ins with the state.
A Ninth Circut panel split 2-1 over whether First Amendment concerns should prevent congressional investigatos from obtaining cell records for Arizona's Republican Party Chair.
U.K. regulators shut down Meta/GIPHY deal in favor of their own “approved buyer.”
Fearmongering about mass school shootings leads to some dumb, privacy-threatening ideas.
Despite experts recommending that birth control be sold over the counter, the U.S. still treats the pill like it's 1960.
Forensic techniques are nowhere near as reliable as cops shows pretend.
Newspapers deserve a great deal of credit for the expansion of freedom over the past 200 years. But the media have lost credibility.
Plus: The editors consider Ye and social media, then field a question about the TARP bailouts during the 2008 fiscal crisis.
Despite acknowledging that "the costume issue is small," the Iredell-Statesville School Board is suggesting banning animal costumes in response to online rumors.
While campaigning for the midterm election, the president is promoting a disastrous and expensive form of economic protectionism.
Two new studies say there's no evidence of political learning on social media, but it does increasingly teach us to hate our opponents.
The Network State author and serial entrepreneur on the future of freedom, online and offline.
The Network State author and serial entrepreneur on the future of freedom, online and offline.
Any new rules for the crypto market should protect entrepreneurs and investors from overzealous intervention, not subject them to it.
"Sounds like a good reason to think twice about using PayPal," writes Eugene Volokh.
Plus: lawsuit targets Roblox and Discord, 24 million immigration cases in backlog, and more...
While the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act was hailed as a victory for digital privacy, critics warn of a litany of unintended consequences.
The podcast is a debate between legal scholar Brad Smith and myself.
Plus: Musk's Twitter purchase may be back on, global deflation may be looming, and more...
Regular people are not so terminally online.
A First Amendment case prompts The Onion to explain how parody works.
Does Section 230 shield YouTube from lawsuits about recommendations? Can Twitter be forced to pay damages over the terrorists it hasn’t banned?
Plus: SCOTUS is back in session, governments around the world are getting bigger, and more...
The world’s politicians offer a friendly reception to attacks on free speech.
Rather than being replaced by A.I., humans should plan to work with it.
"Upon careful review, we determined this video is not violative of our Community Guidelines and have reinstated it," said a YouTube spokesperson.
The 6th Circuit ruled that qualified immunity prevented Anthony Novak from vindicating his First Amendment rights.
Who cares if it’s legal if it generates politically advantageous outrage and attention?
Reddit users are protesting Texas' H.B. 20, which forces social media platforms to host speech they find objectionable.
Getting the best information when we need it will likely always be a challenge, but the Reddit hack helps.
Why are activists trying to stop research into a promising backup plan to handle climate change?
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
It’s a terrible ruling that misunderstands years of First Amendment precedents. And it’s increasingly likely that the Supreme Court will have to intervene.
Plus: giving migrants false addresses, regulating podcasts, and more...
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
They mandate occupation of private property without the consent of the owner.
The intellectual watchdog keeps tabs on everyone from The 1619 Project's Nikole Hannah-Jones to Mises Institute's Hans-Hermann Hoppe in the name of serious scholarship.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10