The Filibuster Will Survive Because a Few Democrats Are Smart Enough Not To Kill It
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema is right: Democrats have more to lose by ending the filibuster than by putting up with it.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema is right: Democrats have more to lose by ending the filibuster than by putting up with it.
Plus: Biden to back bill ending crack/cocaine sentencing disparity, the truth about tech startup creation, and more...
Plus: Georgia's voting roll purge draws media hype, Florida's drug law hypocrisy, and more...
David Chipman's obfuscation, like the president's vagueness, is aimed at concealing the illogic of targeting firearms based on their "military-style" appearance.
Yet more evidence that we are ruled by incompetents.
No justices disagreed, but Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas object that the majority is sidestepping a debate over when laws can overrule religious beliefs.
The outcome of today's Fulton v. City of Philadelphia.
The Supreme Court properly concludes that there is no standing to challenge a legal provision that has no effect.
Putting criticisms of the Senate, Electoral College, and Supreme Court in perspective.
The Wyoming Republican believes bitcoin provides a serious alternative store of value, will spur renewable energy, and just might save the dollar.
Repealing the law that allowed America to depose Saddam Hussein won't stop us from waging war elsewhere.
If workers were as eager to join unions as President Joe Biden seems to think, they wouldn't need a more powerful NLRB to encourage that outcome.
Lawmakers want to pay cities to help cannabis businesses navigate the state’s oppressive bureaucracy.
The COVID-19 pandemic showed the dangers of letting governors unilaterally, dramatically, and indefinitely magnify their own powers.
A new brief asks the Supreme Court to reinstate Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s death sentence.
State legislators across the country are working to weaken the enforcement of federal gun laws by emulating immigration activists.
The little-known but outrageous practice allows federal judges enhance defendants' sentence based on conduct a jury acquitted them of.
Six different states are already suing over a broad prohibition on tax cuts that was slipped into March's $1.9 trillion COVID relief bill.
A new decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals.
The law would make a federal case out of every aggrieved internet user and compel companies to host messages they do not wish to platform.
Reason tried out the field test kits used to test for drugs in prison. They were unreliable and confusing.
Citizens and companies increasingly cannot count on the stability of the law when making decisions about their lives and businesses.
The disastrous oral argument produced a quick ruling from the bench.
California’s problems are indeed daunting, but even troubled San Francisco is still a lovely city.
The puzzle of marijuana's Schedule I status invites a reconsideration of the agency's vast discretion to decide which substances should be prohibited.
Can a cop enter a suspect's home without a warrant if they're in pursuit and have probable cause to believe the suspect has committed a misdemeanor?
A new lawsuit challenges Minnesota's law requiring a person be at least 21 years old to carry a handgun.
The resolution is part of a broader movement to rein in executive power during emergencies.
Plus: How Facebook killed blogging, the trouble with so-called common good originalism, and more...
Lockdowns, tariffs, and other market interventions made wood an expensive commodity.
Jones has been accused of fabricating her COVID-19 cover-up claims. Now she says she's running for Congress.
A new conservative faction embraces "authoritative rule for the common good."
The U.S. Innovation and Competition Act is a lobbyist-crafted proposal that funnels emergency spending to politically connected special interests.
Crashing website and impenetrable government bureaucracy greet the tenants and landlords trying to access billions in federally funded rent relief.
Insightful thoughts from Dean Vik Amar relevant to Ramos v. Louisiana
Polling shows a sharp partisan divide on the issue, but it also suggests that compromise might be possible.
The state is scheduled to ease its lockdowns on June 15. But Newsom still wants the power to control the terms.
Substantive criminal law consists of more than statutes and formal common law.
Using the process of elimination, the culprit seems clear.
Special interests are trying to stuff newfound alcohol freedom back in the bottle as the pandemic ends.
A new paper suggests that pollution (and prevailing winds) may be part of the answer.
Doing the wrong thing at an off-campus party could lead to on-campus consequences.
From Mitch McConnell's perspective, an independent commission can only mean trouble.
"When you've done nothing wrong, you shouldn't be subjected to an investigation," says Paul Snitko, whose box was seized in a March 22 FBI raid of a Beverly Hills business.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10