Supreme Court OT2023 in the Final Stretch
The justices are rushing to close out the term before the end of June.
The justices are rushing to close out the term before the end of June.
The bill would banish insurance companies from the state if they invest in companies profiting from oil and gas.
The Biden administration says its new guidance will make pandemic research safer. Critics say it suffers the same flaws as past, failed gain-of-function regulations.
A handful of Republican lawmakers worked with Democrats to repeal an 1864 law banning most abortions.
Chevron deference, a doctrine created by the Court in 1984, gives federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the meaning of various laws. But the justices may overturn that.
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
We could grow our way out of our debt burden if politicians would limit spending increases to just below America's average yearly economic growth. But they won't even do that.
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
Whatever you think of abortion, the Department of Justice's latest approach to these cases is misguided.
There is a growing movement to let churches and other religious organizations build housing on their property that would otherwise be banned by zoning regulations.
It's a good policy, authorized by the law. But it will likely face lawsuits, nonetheless, potentially leading to a prolonged legal battle.
Issuing a posthumous pardon for Bennett would reaffirm our nation’s commitment to free expression and intellectual freedom.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the Selective Service.
The blanket pardon is one of the largest yet, and another sign of the collapse of public support for marijuana prohibition.
It often takes almost a year or more to get public records from the federal government. Here are some things you can do while you wait.
Does America really need a National Strategic Dad Jokes Reserve?
The Selective Service should be abolished, not made more efficient and equitable.
There may not be a perfect solution to ending homelessness, but there are some clear principles to reduce the friction for those working to do so.
The court concludes states are likely to succeed in their procedural challenges to the Education Department's decision to extend Bostock to Title IX.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
The justices still have over one-third of the term's cases remaining.
Six justices agreed that federal regulators had misconstrued the statutory definition of a machine gun.
The justice's benign comments set off a lengthy news cycle and have been treated as a scandal by some in the media. Why?
In his AHM v. FDA concurrence, Justice Thomas suggests the Court needs to rethink associational standing and questions whether it comports with Article III.
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted during oral arguments, the right to sell a shirt is different from the right to be the only one who can sell that shirt.
...as protests outside Congress escalate into violence.
Not a single justice was impressed by the unimpressive standing theories offered in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA.
Plus: The Federal Reserve considers an interest rate cut, its chairman considers persistently high inflation, housing pops up on the National Mall, and more...
The new FAFSA form is like HealthCare.gov but for college students.
The decision allows the lawsuit to proceed, albeit with fewer plaintiffs.
Government school advocates say competition "takes money away" from government schools. That is a lie.
A new study suggests political considerations may influence the enforcement of federal environmental law.
Plus: Sen. John Fetterman introduces a new zoning reform bill, U.C. Berkeley finally beats the NIMBYs in court, and Austin's unwise "equity overlay."
The court ruled that it is unconstitutional for officials to remove library books with the "intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree."
The plaintiffs hope to "help Republicans and conservatives see why this ban is inconsistent with the free speech values they say they care about."
Officials suspend efforts to force X to suppress the world’s access to video of a crime.
Ending U.S. aid would give Washington less leverage in the Middle East. That's why it's worth doing.
A new law will make it much harder to film law enforcement officers in their public duties. Does that violate the First Amendment?
California's stringent AI regulations have the power to stifle innovation nationwide, impacting all of us.
The transit authority was sued after rejecting an ad that directed viewers to go to a website "to find out about the faith of our founders."
Fifth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
They're coming for new bags after old bag-ban failed.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks