Executive Power and the Metonymy Error
How has residuum theory gotten this all so wrong?
How has residuum theory gotten this all so wrong?
It's a problematic sentiment on several levels.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Gorsuch suggests it's a good thing when parties don't rely upon the Chevron doctrine.
The administration continues to try to impose grant conditions on state and local governments that were never authorized by by Congress. In two new decision, courts continue to rule against them.
One pension-spiking tool can be scaled back now, but the California Rule remains intact.
We live in desperate times when the brake on both Democratic socialism and Republican executive-branch abuse is a 78-year-old San Francisco Democrat.
Against the Imperial Presidency.
An official tells Reason that a draft of the EO targets federal grants to universities and colleges.
Cramer tells Reason he's not sure which way he'll vote on a resolution to block it.
New proposal from Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Elizabeth Warren would stop states from using the dumbest of all reasons to keep someone out of work.
Democrats approached the issue carefully in 2016. Now six presidential candidates are all-in for complete reform.
A candid picture of how investors see the slowly unfolding pension crisis
"This isn't a partisan issue," the Utah senator says. "This is a constitutional issue."
"I can only warn you that the people who follow Trump as I did, blindly, are going to suffer the same consequences that I did."
Two bills dealing with background checks would criminalize innocent behavior and unjustly interfere with the exercise of Second Amendment rights.
Libertarian Rep. Justin Amash joined with Democrats to oppose the president's power grab.
"We have to make sure that each branch stays within its own lane and Congress retains its power over the purse."
In a just-filed brief, the Trump Administration asks Supreme Court to reduce the degree of deference government agencies receive.
Unlike Thomas and Gorsuch, Kavanaugh stayed mum on originalism in a major constitutional case.
The strongest legal argument against Trump's attempt to use emergency powers to build the wall is that declaring an emergency does not authorize him to spend money and condemn property for that purpose. But he also lacks grounds to declare an emergency in the first place.
More than 200 Democrats-plus one Republican-co-sponsor a joint resolution against Trump's national emergency declaration.
Why did the pension board go along with the scam? Probably because its members are current officers and retirees.
The decision in Timbs v. Indiana is a significant step forward for property rights and civil liberties, though a key issue remains to be resolved by lower courts.
A win for private property rights, and a defeat for proponents of eminent domain.
Congress seems to have authorized this end run around its spending power. Can it do that?
"Extraordinary conditions do not create or enlarge constitutional power."
Episode 2 of Free Speech Rules by UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh
Trump has exhibited a "flagrant disregard of fundamental separation of powers principles engrained in the United States Constitution," the suit reads.
Bargaining over policy is supposed to be frustrating. That's a feature, not a bug, of limited government.
My 2015 critique of Presidents Day is, if anything, even more relevant four years later.
A few thoughts on the First Circuit's separation of powers ruling on the Puerto Rico bankruptcy board
A variety of legal experts weigh in on the subject, including me. Most conclude Trump may have the authority to declare an emergency, but not to spend funds and seize property for the wall.
Under a little-known regulation that dates back to the 1930s, the president has legal power over electronic transmissions.
"But I wanted to do it faster."
There is no good justification for what the president is doing. Republicans and conservatives need to call him out on it.
Plus: Congress forgets to fund the First Step Act, The New York Times chastises smug politicians over Amazon, and what if the U.S. were 100 city-states?
The FIRST STEP Act was supposed to get $75 million to fund reentry programs and job training. That's missing from the budget bill being voted on Thursday.
A summary of the reasons why Trump lacks the power to use emergency powers to build his border wall, and why it would cause great harm and set a dangerous precedent if he did. Other than that, it's a great idea!
Rep. Andy Harris's (R-Md.) office refuses to say whether the congressman supports prosecution of the young activist.
Trump won't rely on Congress to fund his 200 miles of border wall.
As the lawsuit against FOSTA hits appeals court, three essays about the law that everyone should read.
With the federal government $22 trillion in debt, Congress has decided to spend more money.
Amash had an interesting reason for not voting "yes."
Extreme weather events around the globe have tripled since the 1980s, but what's happening in the U.S.?
Make no mistake about it, avoiding another shutdown is for the best.
A new record, but one that won't stand for long.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks