Trump Acquitted in Second Impeachment Trial Despite 7 Republicans Voting To Convict
Whether the reality-show-star-turned-first-president-to-be-impeached-twice has a future in American politics, however, sadly remains an open question.
Whether the reality-show-star-turned-first-president-to-be-impeached-twice has a future in American politics, however, sadly remains an open question.
The outcome shows that it is almost impossible to convict a president in an era of severe polarization. But Trump's second impeachment still served some useful purposes..
The 33-year-old lawmaker, who occupies Justin Amash's old seat, on how his party needs to reclaim the mantle of limited government, capitalism, and individualism.
The first-in-the-nation tax is an expensive and regressive policy that's also possibly unconstitutional.
He betrayed his oath and duties as president by hesitating to intervene and refusing to unambiguously condemn the violence.
Kim Ogg ran for district attorney as a criminal justice reformer. Maybe she should think about what that entails.
The plan would redistribute wealth, create distortions, and grow government.
Plus: Dems ask FDA to change abortion pill prescribing rule, Vice targets Clubhouse, and more...
He gets to the right answer, but botched the execution.
Why didn't Cuomo and De Blasio build a decent, user-friendly website?
The 33-year-old successor to Justin Amash's House seat says his party has abandoned limited government, economic freedom, and individualism.
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
The former President's attorneys repeatedly (mis)cite the work of Professor Brian Kalt on late impeachments.
He is on firmer ground in arguing that the Senate does not have the authority to try a former president, although that issue is highly contested.
The letter was signed by some 170 legal scholars across the political spectrum, including several VC bloggers.
Fourth Amendment advocates prevail in Wingate v. Fulford.
The op ed, published today, explains why the First Amendment doesn't protect Trump against impeachment and conviction for his role in the attack on the Capitol.
Alas, the precedent for partisan votes on impeachment was set before Donald Trump.
This is probably not what Lyndon B. Johnson had in mind.
Plus: Pandemic housing prices are overvalued, U.S. will withdraw support for war in Yemen, and more...
Under fire for endorsing wacky conspiracy theories, the Georgia representative blames the internet.
Why Republican Senators can vote on the merits of Trump's impeachment even if they believe the Seante has no power to impeach ex-officers.
The Georgia representative has embraced nearly every crazy conspiracy theory that is popular on the right.
Senate Democrats will now take (partial) control of the Senate chamber.
The reconciliation process exists for a reason. Discarding it for political expediency should be viewed with skepticism.
There are plausible arguments on both sides of the debate.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
The House brief does a solid job of laying out the case against Trump. The defense brief is far less impressive.
Plus: Oregon decriminalizes hard drugs, Kroger closes stores over hazard pay rule, and more...
Biden has also moved quickly to remove some oversight that limited the growth of the regulatory state.
If the refusal of lawmakers to enact a president's policies is justification for unilateral executive action, then a slide toward elective monarchy is inevitable.
Abolishing the filibuster will make it even harder for the Senate to function.
While many prominent constitutional scholars think trying a former president is perfectly legal, the dissenters make some points that are worth considering.
The New York governor should look to his own state.
Now is the time to act.
The controversy over Trump’s pardons and commutations highlights longstanding problems with clemency.
Authorities "shall destroy the videos unlawfully obtained through the surveillance of the Orchids of Asia Day Spa," a federal judge says.
If passed, new laws will give parents more control over how their education dollars are spent.
Out with the CDC and teachers unions, in with school choice for everyone.
An interesting question of institutional norms
On the validity of an impeachment trial for a former president.
The lawsuit from three Orange County preservation groups argues that supposedly historic buildings should be afforded the same environmental protections as "air, water, and forests."
The CRA may offer Democrats a quick and easy way to repeal Trump Administration regulations, if they are willing to use it.
The signers include a wide range of constitutional scholars across the political spectrum, including Federalist Society co-founder Steve Calabresi.
That punishment for reinforcing the delusions that drove the Capitol riot is highly unlikely, and it would set a troubling precedent.
Partisans who abandon constitutional principles because they prove inconvenient are in for a rude surprise when the other team wins.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks