Biden Nominee to the First Circuit Faces Potential Democratic Opposition Over Abortion
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
Why I oppose both right-wing efforts to neuter judicial review in Israel and left-wing attempts to do the same in the US.
Thoughts on recent oral argument exchanges on whether the Administrative Procedure Act contemplates (let alone requires) universal vacatur.
The Bank Secrecy Act divides the justices in an unusual way, and Justice Barrett authors her fourth opinion in an argued case.
To the junior-most justice goes a case arising out of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction concerning the Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler's Checks Act.
The Supreme Court considers the scope of presidential power in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown.
Justice Barrett has produced two majority opinions before most of her colleagues have produced one.
A proposal to limit state AG (and other) forum-shopping for national injunctions.
We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.
By destroying judicial review, they would empower the narrow right-wing majority to violate the rights of minorities.
The Supreme Court has been slow to issue opinions this term, but the first opinion has finally been released.
It may sound bizarre, but yes, you can be punished at sentencing for an offense you were acquitted of by a jury.
The justices heard oral arguments in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo.
It is becoming a pattern for Supreme Court justices to make significant amounts of money by publishing books.
Justice Thomas' footprints are all over the Court's recently concluded term.
Jonathan Mitchell failed in his effort to become a legal academic, so he put his theories into practice instead.
A brief report on Justice Sonia Sotomayor's remarks to the Assocation of American Law Schools conference.
The Appeals Panel Rejects a Trangender Student's Bid to Use Bathroom Corresponding to the Student's Gender Identity Instead of Biological Sex.
The Supreme Court's oral arguments have become significantly longer, but the Court has yet to issue an opinion on the merits so far this term.
The governor and attorney general say they’ll appeal to the state Supreme Court.
A progressive makes the case the two justices should step down within the next two years so that President Biden may appoint their successors with a Democratic Senate.
A split U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied an en banc petition challenging the Federal Election Commission's failure to pursue claims against New Models.
Slate's legal correspondent questioned the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit about the Federalist Society.
Originalist scholar Larry Solum suggests KBJ could be the Left's Antonin Scalia.
In a brief and forceful opinion, a unanimous court explains why the trial court never had jurisdiction to consider Trump's filings in the first place.
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine's appointment to the Supreme Court will dertermine the orientation of the Ohio Supreme Court.
Justices Thomas and Gorsuch have a much greater appetite for reconsidering prior precedent than the other justices do.
A divided panel concludes that government officials forced to testify at Flint Water Crisis civil trial did not waive their constitutional right against self-incrimination just because they had answered questions in depositions.
Supreme Court protesters may get their moment of fame, but they may make it less likely the justices will allow live video broadcast of oral arguments.
The federal appellate judge suggests judges should focus less on social media attention, and more on ensuring their opinions are clear, succinct and correct.
The Honorable Ben Beaton would prefer not to be called "Your Honor."
An amicus brief by Professor Derek Muller suggests the justices need not confront the "Independent State Legislature" doctrine head on.
Pro-tip: If you are sued, and you expect your insurer to pick up the bill, it is a good idea to give them timely notice.
In its latest filing, the Department of Justice seeks to put an end to Judge Cannon's interference with the federal government's investigation documents kept at Mar-a-Lago.
The Court's newest justice was an extremely active questioner during the Supreme Court's October arguments.
An unsurprising development in the former President's latest legal doings.
As the election approaches, the President sharpens his criticism of the Supreme Court.
An appellate panel thoroughly dismantles Judge Cannon's order blocking Department of Justice access to documents President Trump kept at Mar-a-Lago.
Based upon Totenberg's new book, a prominent legal ethicist thinks the conflict was a real one.
A judge sided with a plaintiff who objects to procuring coverage for HIV-prevention medications. Rightly so.
The president claims broad authority to act under a post-9/11 law.
The case shows the power given to judges when parental consent or notification is required for a minor's abortion.
Justice Breyer consistently resisted conservative efforts to constrain federal power, so his opinion in Torres is a fitting swan song.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10