Critics Fundamentally Misconstrue the Supreme Court's Bump Stock Ruling
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the Selective Service.
The court concludes states are likely to succeed in their procedural challenges to the Education Department's decision to extend Bostock to Title IX.
Six justices agreed that federal regulators had misconstrued the statutory definition of a machine gun.
In his AHM v. FDA concurrence, Justice Thomas suggests the Court needs to rethink associational standing and questions whether it comports with Article III.
Not a single justice was impressed by the unimpressive standing theories offered in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA.
A new study suggests political considerations may influence the enforcement of federal environmental law.
Green groups dropped their suits after the various challenges to the SEC's climate disclosure rule were consolidated in a fairly conservative circuit.
In an interesting dissent, Judge Allison Eid argues it violates existing nondelegation doctrine precedent.
The First Amendment applies even to the CEOs of successful companies, but the NLRB seems to disagree.
There are no good sides in today's Supreme Court case concerning the EMTALA and abortion.
The research the FDA relies upon to claim banning menthol cigarettes would improve public health is not aligned with the agency's approach to tobacco regulation.
A district court concludes that the Department of Transportation lacks the authority to force states to try and reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with highway use.
If doctors cannot sue the FDA for failing to restrict pharmaceuticals or other products, can anyone else? And if not, is this a problem?
Live commentary on the Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
The threshold issue in today's oral argument is Article III standing, and that issue should be determinative.
Yet another case that Justice Kavanaugh would like to hear that does not interest enough of his colleagues.
The Department of Justice is asking the Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit's Rejection of the FDA's "Surprise Switcheroo."
Another federal appellate judge expresses discontent with current standing doctrine.
The Second Circuit divides over whether an association must identify an injured member by name for the purposes of Article III. (Updated)
Several justices seemed troubled by an ATF rule that purports to ban bump stocks by reinterpreting the federal definition of machine guns.
Did we get a hint to the outcome in one of this term's bigger cases at today's oral argument?
The Court also rejects a late-filed amicus briefs from the American Bar Association, but accepts one from former FDA Commissioners.
Some thoughts on the most important issue in Relentless and Loper Bright.
The panel covered many cases and featured views many would not expect at a Fed Soc event.
The Court granted two petitions for certiorari seeking review of a controversial lower court decision limiting federal approval of mifepristone.
The Supreme Court's first decision of the term does not decide very much.
An important challenge to the use of agency adjudication to enforce federal regulations.
The Supreme Court will consider whether federal agencies’ administrative judges violate the Seventh Amendment.
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
The Court saw no reason to consider the Eighth Circuit's conclusion that the states lacked standing.
Congress made a small addition to the requirements for notice-and-comment rulemaking.
The Solicitor General rejects an academic argument offered in defense of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit takes issue with how the FDA evaluated Fontem's unflavored vaping products.
The Biden Administration is revising the rules for how agencies conduct cost-benefit analyses, and some CBA experts have expressed concerns.
The judges recognize that Congress ended their ability to review the Mountain Valley Pipeline, but they seem none too happy about it.
The idea that greater assertions of executive authority require greater support than ordinary acts is not a new one.
The Court will consdier whether to invalidate the CFPB's funding, narrow standing, and overturn Chevron, among other things.
C. Boyden Gray was a pivotal figure within the Republican Party on environmental law.
The Clean Water Act decision was a unanimous win for the Sacketts, and a 5-4 victory for Justice Scalia's 2006 Rapanos v. United States plurality.
The Securities & Exchange Commission again delays issuing a controversial anticipated rule.
A welcome reminder that reviewing courts must judge the propriety of agency actions solely by the grounds invoked by the agency.
Plus: Divides over misinformation, on free markets and social justice, and more…
Overruling Chevron won't gut the administrative state or even severely constrain it. But it could help strengthen the rule of law.
One of today's two cert grants comes in a case asking the justices to reconsider Chevron v. NRDC.
A three-judge panel concludes that bump stocks cannot be considered machine gun parts under the rule of lenity.
Is the publc getting what it wants from the administrative state?
Those claiming they are subject to unconstitutional agency proceedings need not suffer through agency proceedings before bringing their claims to federal court.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10