"There Is, Technically, No Snail Darter," But the Snail Darter Still Delayed the Tellico Dam
A case study in how the Endangered Species Act encourages the politicization and distortion of science.
A case study in how the Endangered Species Act encourages the politicization and distortion of science.
The unanimous panel has little difficulty concluding the FCC sought to exercise authority it did not have.
Why Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are overestimating the extent to which the administrative state can be brought to heel through Presidential fiat.
The junior justice authors a unanimous immigration law decision for the first of the term.
An e-liquid manufacturer is challenging the FDA's "arbitrary and capricious" rejection of flavored vaping products.
Maybe we can all agree that government officials shouldn’t target political enemies.
The private nondelegation doctrine is getting an increasing amount of attention from the courts.
A challenge to the FCC's Universal Service Fee could produce a major administrative law decision.
Brendan Carr’s plans for "reining in Big Tech" are a threat to limited government, free speech, free markets, and the rule of law.
Unsurprisingly, no justice showed any interest in reviving a lawsuit that should have died long ago.
The justices, including Trump's nominees, have shown they are willing to defy his will when they think the law requires it.
The Ohio Solicitor General's office defends universal vacatur under the Administrative Procedure Act
The Treasury's sweeping rule curtailing dual-use technology transactions with Chinese firms will reduce domestic growth, innovation, and security.
The National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is holding vehicles to higher standards than it does drivers.
With today's cert grants, the Court now has four cases that address the issue of where suits can be filed against federal agencies and who can file them.
It appears that a majority of judges on the D.C. Circuit believe it should be easier to seek judicial review of Federal Elections Commission non-enforcement decisions.
Some were surprised by the Supreme Court's action, but they should not have been.
A successful appointments clause challenge to Regional Fishery Management Councils. (Updated to fix block quotes)
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
A recent pair of panels looking at how nationwide injunctions impact federal regulatory programs.
He returned S.B. 961 to the California Senate for all the wrong reasons.
The Court's decision to overturn Chevron should be seen as more of a "course correction" than a revolution. (Updated with Video.)
No, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's initial standing rulings were not faithful applications of Supreme Court precedent.
One of the nation's finest oral advocates discusses representing the United States in the Supreme Court and other topics.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration declares a crisis and issues new regulations.
A three-judge panel concludes the rule's challenger are likely to succeed on the merits.
The Supreme Court's conservatives are not cutting conservative litigants any slack (and that's a good thing).
A majority of the judges concludes this fee constitutes a tax, the authority for which is improperly delegated.
Recent actions by the FTC show that its officers should review the Constitution.
The agency claims DOI and DOC have "a high potential for abuse" because they resemble other drugs it has placed in Schedule I.
The Biden administration says its new Title IX interpretation is a legitimate reading of the statute, but opponents characterize it as arbitrary and capricious.
Proposed bills reveal the extreme measures E.A.’s AI doomsayers support.
The decision to overturn Chevron removes an agency trump card, but does not instruct courts to ignore agency opinions--and they won't.
The 5th Circuit ruled that the agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it rejected applications from manufacturers of flavored nicotine e-liquids.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
“Immigration is an area of the law where the partisan alignments break down over Chevron.”
It won't end the administrative state or even significantly reduce the amount of federal regulation. But it's still a valuable step towards protecting the rule of law and curbing executive power.
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.
In a 5-4 decision, the male justices side with the state and industry challengers and the female justices side with the Environmental Protection Agency
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
Even if one thinks the federal government crossed the line in pushing more aggressive social-media-platform content moderation policies, plaintiffs must still satisfy the traditional requirements of Article III standing.
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the Selective Service.
The court concludes states are likely to succeed in their procedural challenges to the Education Department's decision to extend Bostock to Title IX.
Six justices agreed that federal regulators had misconstrued the statutory definition of a machine gun.
In his AHM v. FDA concurrence, Justice Thomas suggests the Court needs to rethink associational standing and questions whether it comports with Article III.
Not a single justice was impressed by the unimpressive standing theories offered in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks