Frustrated with Secretive Health Care Bill, Rand Paul Proposes Giving Senators Time to Read It
Paul's "Read the Bills" resolution would change Senate rules to allow one day of transparency for every 20 pages of a bill's length.
Paul's "Read the Bills" resolution would change Senate rules to allow one day of transparency for every 20 pages of a bill's length.
They haven't found any that work yet, but Democrats continue running political experiments with expanding government's role in health care.
Why are Republicans rushing a bill no one likes? Here are five theories.
A medical marijuana provider unsuccessfully argues that improper jury instructions made his conviction invalid.
Most gun-related deaths among minors are homicides, and four-fifths involve teenagers.
Neo-Malthusianism in the Sunday New York Times
Defying its own data, the CDC continues to obscure the enormous harm-reducing potential of e-cigarettes.
The bipartisan CARERS Act prohibits federal prosecution of patients and providers who comply with state law.
Hospitals use CON laws to stop potential competition, limiting care for patients and opportunities for doctors.
The Senate GOP is relying on the same opaque process they accused Democrats of using to pass Obamacare.
The Senate GOP bill is likely to expand subsidies, preserve regulations, and delay the Medicaid rollback.
Make pharmaceutical competition great again.
Would the Trump administration give states permission to pursue government-run health care? That's what California and New York would need.
Lack of single payer hasn't seemed to hinder superior progress made in terms of life expectancy gains in the U.S. since UN records start in 1960.
Contrary to what The New York Times claims, the outcry over EpiPen prices has made them lower.
The sales tax' big brother tends to cripple growth, lower wages, and promote inequality, economists warn. Will that stop California from doing it?
This is how the GOP treats their top legislative priorities.
This is why the GOP health care bill is stalled in the Senate.
A rule is under review that would (reportedly) relax the hotly debated requirement.
Under Trump's budget, Medicaid spending would reach the highest level in U.S. history.
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
The novelist, activist, and BoingBoing founder on cyber warfare, Uber-style reputation economics, and what he's likely to get arrested for someday.
It would leave slightly fewer people without insurance coverage than under the original version of the bill, but would trim less from the federal deficit.
There were 3,256 such surgeries in 2016, says the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. But how it got this number is anyone's guess.
Like in Colorado, New York, and Vermont, California is learning that a single-payer plan would be prohibitively expensive.
The president wants to cut Medicaid but leave Medicare untouched, rewarding supporters at the expense of America's long-term finances.
As usual, coverage of the latest scare ignores or misrepresents the relative potency of caffeinated beverages.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
New York collects about $80 billion in revenue annually, but the health care plan passed Tuesday would cost at least $91 billion every year (and probably more).
Taking medical marijuana across state lines isn't any more illegal than transporting it within a state.
And it always ends the same way. Here's the political and economic reasons why America won't be converting to a single-payer health care system anytime soon.
Reason editor at large joins Killer Mike and Jon Favreau in conversation about Comey, Russia, health care and more
Aetna exits the exchanges, citing massive losses and structural instability.
Obamacare was bad, and its replacements look like a dog's breakfast.
They might not reduce premiums and won't fix the problems plaguing the individual insurance exchanges, but they will spread the political pain.
Accommodating religious objections to Obamacare's contraceptive mandate does not violate anyone's rights.
Not a radical reformer, but clearly understands how overregulation is slowing medical innovation
Not only can entitlement programs be rolled back, but politicians who do it can even get re-elected.
Reason editors Nick Gillespie, Katherine Mangu-Ward, and Peter Suderman talk Trump, French election, health care, Colbert, and the FCC.
A signing statement suggests the president may ignore a congressional rider protecting patients' access to cannabis.
It locks in many of the worst elements of Obamacare while making actual market-friendly reforms next-to-impossible.
Supply-side restrictions like Certificate of Necessity leave people without the medical services they need, even if they can afford them.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks