2022 Proved That Governments Can't Improve on Good Economic Principles
We’d all be better off if politicians spared us their experiments in subsidies, wages, and trade.
We’d all be better off if politicians spared us their experiments in subsidies, wages, and trade.
Plus: Would Adam Smith be a libertarian if he were alive today?
The company's broad definition of "misleading information" and its deference to authority invited censorship by proxy.
People in power lean on private businesses to impose authoritarian policies forbidden to the government.
Standing with blank pages in hand, the protesters' goal is to make manifest the implied violence that authoritarian states use to keep order.
The tendency of those in power to topple or embarrass themselves by overreaching should provide a lesson to policy makers.
The Administration claims to want to end the policy. But, as Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell points out, it is actually expanding its use.
"She never spoke a word to me after this," the staffer, Sasha Georgiades, tells Reason.
If lawmakers keep spending like they are, and if the Fed backs down from taming inflation, then the government may create a perfect storm.
While other pandemic policies have ended, the migration measure has “outlived [its] shelf life,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote yesterday.
The decision doesn't actually require continuation of the policy, but will have that effect indirectly. Justice Neil Gorsuch's dissent explains why the Court was wrong to take this step.
Landlords say that nearly three years of eviction moratoriums is forcing some property owners out of the rental business entirely.
Once the government has an excuse to electronically track everywhere you've been and everyone you've been near, abuses are predictable.
Elon Musk reignited the GOP’s interest to bring charges against Anthony Fauci.
Report: “Half of democratic governments around the world are in decline.”
Fintech platforms facilitated fraud in the Paycheck Protection Program, according to a new congressional report.
Putting the district's train system back on track will take more than better bureaucracy.
College students should be able to use their own judgment on COVID boosters, not be forced into them by learning institutions.
The long-term economic and social impacts of zero-COVID can't be reversed as easily.
It's especially outrageous when considering the billions of dollars in fraud that took place thanks to COVID-19 relief programs.
You can’t turn lives and economies off and on without inflicting lingering harm.
"You have this looming power over you that essentially can end your career," says Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya.
In times of public health crises, government red tape and misguided communication make matters worse.
Employment is an ultimatum game, where playing along might get workers less than employers, but refusing to play gets everyone zero.
Elon Musk's rescission of the platform's prior policy, which forbade dissent from official guidance, is consistent with his promise of lighter moderation.
Given the harms caused, lessons should be learned from China’s people, not its government.
From the sounds of it, the Air Force's attorneys didn't think too carefully about how to respond to Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) claims.
Too many Western governments want to follow in the footsteps of authoritarians when it comes to tech privacy.
The president has urged the Chinese government to respect the rights of anti-lockdown demonstrators. He actively encouraged the Canadian government to end the trucker protests.
Plus: The editors ponder the lack of women’s pants pockets in the marketplace.
Plus: Reason's holiday gift guide, a possible new antitrust suit against Microsoft, and more...
These are the people who showed up when the economy was shut down by the government, working in jobs labeled "essential."
Plus: A questionable consensus on autism treatment, Fauci to be deposed in social media case, and more...
The state is threatening to punish doctors whose advice deviates from the "scientific consensus."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded some state challenges to the COVID relief bill were not justiciable, but reaches the merits in one case and finds the law lacking.
Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya debates Yale's Sten Vermund on COVID-19 lockdowns, focused protection, and the Great Barrington Declaration.
Two public health experts debate the merits of lockdowns and focused protection
Two chapters of the organization say the law violates the First Amendment.
Republican Joe Lombardo ousts incumbent Steve Sisolak over pandemic closures.
The CCP’s tyranny extends even to U.S. college campuses, where Chinese and Taiwanese students fear censorship.
Republican Governors Ron DeSantis and Brian Kemp made a name for themselves opposing COVID mandates.
The law authorizes regulators to discipline physicians who deviate from the "contemporary scientific consensus."
Public officials concealed their conflicts of interest and role in funding research that may have caused the pandemic, says health reporter Emily Kopp.
Reflexive opposition to the 45th president was terrible for Covid policy and basic ethics.
"I have muzzled myself ever since 2009....Pretty soon you're going to be hearing about Crazy John, who's no longer muzzled."
The FDA delayed the delivery of 1 million vaccine doses, and many high-risk Americans were turned away from health clinics that had run out of vaccines.
The idea that the Fed has the knowledge necessary to control the economy with perfectly calibrated policies was always an illusion.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks