Keystone Pipeline's Cancellation Shows How Arbitrary Presidential Power Subverts the Rule of Law
Citizens and companies increasingly cannot count on the stability of the law when making decisions about their lives and businesses.
Citizens and companies increasingly cannot count on the stability of the law when making decisions about their lives and businesses.
A big defeat for anti-pipeline activists.
State Department reverses Obama ruling and permits construction of Keystone Pipeline.
Liberal Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, that's who. Does this make Obama look like a chump for nixing Keystone XL?
"Globally, a third of oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80 per cent of current coal reserves should remain unused."
Credit Trump with bringing a common state and local flashpoint issue into the primaries.
"The pipeline would not make a meaningful long-term contribution to our economy."
The president is now in a big hurry after 7 years of delay
Environmentalists cry foul and urge President Obama to stop the pipeline
Evidently bows to environmentalist lobby
House approves Keystone XL pipeline construction.
A novel idea: Why not let the builders decide whether or not it is economic to construct?
Symbolic vetoes are not in the national interest.
Senators vote 50 to 49 that it is "sense of the Senate" that "human activity significantly contributes to climate change."
Would add just 1/100th of a degree to man-made warming by 2100
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline proposal has the potential to become the Keystone XL of the East.
Possibly finished until the end of Obama's term
Pushed back over Nebraska court ruling, public response volume
Rights not convenient for state power
Governor had approved the route
Despite the Obama administration's recent climate change initiatives
Keeping hope alive on both sides of the issue.
Everybody except the environmentalists
The procrastinator must be the decider
Served president in his first term
Begging the president to let the oil flow
The media is either economically illiterate or deliberately biased on the matter.
If it doesn't "significantly" increase carbon pollution
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10