Here's One Way To Move Toward Responsible Government and Sane Fiscal Policy
The Copenhagen Consensus has long championed a cost-benefit approach for addressing the world's most critical environmental problems.
The Copenhagen Consensus has long championed a cost-benefit approach for addressing the world's most critical environmental problems.
The Biden Administration is revising the rules for how agencies conduct cost-benefit analyses, and some CBA experts have expressed concerns.
My review of Reviving Rationality:Saving Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Sake of the Environment and Our Health by Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz.
Young males infected with COVID-19 are six times more likely to develop myocarditis than those who have been vaccinated.
Epidemics anywhere threaten immunization efforts everywhere, including here at home.
Environmental Protection Agency
"A standard demanding the return of the Stone Age would not prove 'requisite to protect the public health.'"
Are smart Roombas booby-trapped with bombs in our future?
Underpins 80 federal regulations purportedly worth one trillion dollars
While supposedly delivering about the same amount of electricity.
Registry of federal regulations surpasses 50,000 pages, on pace to break annual record.
Will government solutions to global warming be worse than global warming?
Environmental Protection Agency
No regulation is "appropriate" if it does significantly more harm than good, argues majority opinion.
Regulations now cost your family nearly $15,000 annually.
Who could blame them?
TV host Mike Rowe on the educational bias against unglamorous, good-paying work
Model T energy tech is no way to address climate change.
Not very. You are four times more likely to be killed by a lightning bolt than by a terror attack.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10