Does a Judge have to recuse if a conflicted party files an amicus brief? Or should the brief be struck?
The Fifth Circuit struck the brief. Judge Brasher (CA11) recused.
The Fifth Circuit struck the brief. Judge Brasher (CA11) recused.
Threats Against Federal Judges on the Rise
"A lot of people think that law enforcement must be provided by a [government] monopoly," says economist Edward Stringham. But "there are plenty of private examples of people working to create order and safety in society."
Plus: Portland protest updates, Kanye's candidacy, the ACLU's suit to protect Michael Cohen, and more...
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
No one should be forced to pay for officers who spend their days opposing policing reform and defending bad cops.
The Hawaii senator fails to fully consider the causes of bad policing.
It's Schrems II in episode 325 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The former uses "further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion" and the latter uses "further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
Obviously not, but the Associated Press says otherwise.
From the torching of an Elk statue to clandestine raids by federal officers, it's like a bizarro episode of Portlandia
If there's one thing at which governments have excelled during this crisis, it's been collecting fines from anybody who steps out of line.
Plus: How H-1B visa restrictions cost U.S. jobs, a woman sues the British health service over hormone blockers, and more...
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
Colleges need to establish continuity of operations plans to deal to ensure minimal disruptions in teaching and grading.
Helter Skelter: An American Myth doesn’t shed new light, but it’s excellent journalism.
State Prosecutors would then prosecute state criminal offenses in federal court.
The ACLU of Oregon says it's the first of many lawsuits regarding the Trump administration's deployment of federal law enforcement to Portland.
A surprisingly agreeable chat on originalism, the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts and other things.
For state court appeals, 25 days "after entry of judgment." For federal court appeals, "a formal mandate does not issue unless specifically directed."
Mask mandates are dangerous and unjust, regardless of which level of government imposes them.
Noxious odors, trained scientists, and aberrantly salacious products.
A rare gun owner victory in New York court.
As usual, the answer is ... procedure, more procedure, and procedure about procedure.
Americans are increasingly monitored, and COVID-19 health concerns aren’t improving the situation.
Developing high-quality content is difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. No content may be better for students than weak content.
As policy makers consider ways to reduce some of these shocking use-of-force incidents, they need to evaluate the role of unions in protecting overly aggressive officers.
The state has barred hundreds of thousands of residents with felony records from voting without first paying off their court fines and fees.
Inmates serving mandatory minimum sentences have been left behind.
Opinion states that an "inaccurate, offensive, or upsetting" point of view discussed at a CLE Program would not violate Model Rule 8.4(g).
Dozens of dozens of incidents were caught on video.
One department said a protester was hit in the eye with tear gas after the canister bounced. Video shows something entirely different.
Two centuries of precedents say the president is not immune from judicial process.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.