Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Those who reported sexual abuse were sent to a county jail, the suit alleges.
He reversed position only as he decided to run for president and now seems surprised he’s getting asked about it.
Where one public official act is traded for another public official act, there has not been any illegal conduct.
Virginia is now suspending its strip-search policy for minors.
Plus: Free trade and free speech, a teen's death in detention, and more...
Banzai! Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? In this case, yes.
"It's all over Facebook."
I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.
Cities and communities have an uphill battle trying to get abusive and incompetent cops out of uniform.
The officer turned his body camera off, but the incident was still recorded.
The prominent libertarian public interest firm hopes to get the decision reversed, possibly by the Supreme Court.
as a condition of having his criminal contempt sentence suspended. OK, says a North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion, though one judge dissents.
"Postpositive," not posterior.
The cops pulled over David Glen Ward for "stealing" what turned out to be his own car. Then things went south.
The Court will likely dismiss the case as moot. But how? Through a quick, unsigned DIG? Or through a signed, divided opinion in June?
Episode 290 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
(The quote is from October Man, a splendid fantasy novella by Ben Aaronovitch, but it seemed so appropriate here.)
A part of the law intended to hold suspected terrorists for deportation is being twisted to justify indefinite detention.
The arresting officer is on desk duty and an investigation is underway.
A pizza shop vandal, FOIA/RICO/1A, and the Case of the Polite Bank Robber.
The drug wars will continue until the state gets its cut of the money.
In theory, at least, the House could continue to investigate possible impeachment proceedings indefinitely, even after an acquittal
This isn't a Thanksgiving post, but about those other conflicts-of-interest the President seems to have.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks