National Law Journal: "Should Law Schools 'Cancel' SCOTUS Titan John Marshall?"
Cancelling John Marshall makes it big.
Cancelling John Marshall makes it big.
The law professors are Jane Bambauer (Arizona), Mark Lemley (Stanford), and me, and moderator Ted Parson (UCLA).
The Chief Justice surgically sliced up the Court's removal power cases into four categories.
Seila Law and Assignability of Easements
The second rule of Court Packing is you do not talk about Court Packing.
"The organizations collaborated with the Republican attorneys general who filed suit and conscripted law professor Randy Barnett to draft an influential report on the constitutionality of the ACA."
"In order to invoke this Court’s diversity jurisdiction, Plaintiff must allege that the citizenship of each member of the LLC defendant was diverse from that of Plaintiff at the date of this action’s filing."
A 2016 op-ed by Benjamin Wittes and Miguel Estrada is worth revisiting.
Noah Feldman explains why liberals should want someone like Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court
"In NFIB v. Sebelius, the inspiration for Barnett’s book, Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute."
Excessive traffic and pedestrian stops, especially in black communities, are dangerous and counterproductive.
If reports are accurate, Justice Amy Coney Barrett may be the final 9th Justice
Still more on this interesting decision (and one that takes a much less government-friendly approach than many other recent decisions on these general topics).
More on this interesting decision (and one that takes a much less government-friendly approach than many other recent decisions on these general topics).
The distinction between "political messages" and other messages isn't "capable of reasoned application," holds the Third Circuit.
This year's annual confab is remote, but will still feature the annual B. Kenneth Simon Lecture and release of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Houston prohibits zoning. But Houston permits a "Historic Preservation Ordinance."
This case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
Chief Judge Pryor "write[s] separately to explain a difficult truth about the nature of the judicial role."
Voter fraud, Jersey Boys, and inescapable tax debt.
He follows Justice Thomas's dissent from Garza v. Idaho: "Where precedent is seriously questioned 'as an original matter' or under current Supreme Court doctrine, courts 'should tread carefully before extending' it."
"We hold that the constitution requires the Governor immediately to appoint and commission a constitutionally eligible nominee from among the seven remaining candidates already certified by the judicial nominating commission."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks