Michigan Police Won't Be Able to Seize People's Cars for Suspected Drug Crimes Anymore
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has signed three bills to limit civil asset forfeiture.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has signed three bills to limit civil asset forfeiture.
Police had wide authority to seize assets without having to prove a crime even happened, but now the state is tightening the rules.
Greg and Teresa Almond filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the Randolph County Sheriff's Department after it raided their house and seized their savings for a misdemeanor pot offense.
Greg and Teresa Almond lost their house after a financially devastating drug raid involving civil asset forfeiture.
My testimony addressed the general problem of asset forfeiture, the potential impact of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Timbs v. Indiana, and Arkansas' recent reform law.
This 1991 Senate floor speech shows Biden's central role in crafting disastrous crime policies.
The expenses included five-star Parisian hotels and sumptuous dinners.
Arkansas joins three other states in requiring police secure a conviction before they can seize a person's property.
County officials say the Lancaster County district attorney's use of $20,000 in funds intended for drug enforcement to lease an SUV is "improper."
Reports show Michigan police seize cash and cars from hundreds of people who are never convicted of a crime. Momentum is building to stop it.
Unlike Thomas and Gorsuch, Kavanaugh stayed mum on originalism in a major constitutional case.
The decision in Timbs v. Indiana is a significant step forward for property rights and civil liberties, though a key issue remains to be resolved by lower courts.
The Eighth Amendment prohibition against excessive fines and fees applies to states as well, SCOTUS rules, opening a new way to challenge outlandish forfeitures.
Sex, publishing, and quasi-legal theft collide in the Backpage prosecution.
"Exactly what sources and what individuals this money comes from is obscure, and it's obscure because that's the way the federal government wants it."
South Carolina would become the fourth state to abolish the practice of seizing property without a criminal conviction.
The future of civil asset forfeiture law in the United States now revolves around a single Land Rover.
"The robber didn't get anything, but the police got everything."
2018 was a mixed bag, but that means there was still a lot of good news.
Trump's nominee for attorney general is apt to encourage his worst instincts on drug policy.
A new report from ProPublica whitewashes the IRS, while ignoring the positive benefits of tax evasion.
The lawsuit argues that the excessive penalty violated her Eighth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court is currently considering a similar case.
Where does Justice Gorsuch stand on the Privileges or Immunities Clause?
Numerous motorists say rogue cops in a small Northern California town ripped them off during bogus traffic stops.
Plus: good signs in Supreme Court case on asset forfeiture and Ashley Judd talks prostitution.
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer elicited a shocking response during Wednesday's oral argument in a big civil asset forfeiture case.
The Court seems very likely to rule that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applies to state governments, and that at least some asset forfeitures violate the Clause. Potentially a big win for property rights and civil liberties.
The Supreme Court should make it clear that state forfeitures are constrained by the Excessive Fines Clause.
The case both addresses important legal issues, and could have substantial practical implications.
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
The ruling is a major win for Backpage founders James Larkin and Michael Lacey, as well as a strike against government overreach.
A legal settlement guarantees reforms to what was once one of America's most egregious asset forfeiture programs.
After two years of fighting in court, a California couple is getting back $53,000 that was seized from them through asset forfeiture.
It's not a crime to travel with lots of cash. But you still might be treated like a criminal.
If accepted by other courts, the judge's reasoning could curb a variety of other state and federal asset forfeiture policies that threaten the property rights of innocent people.
A new ruling says the city's civil forfeiture program violates the right to due process.
"There is a realistic possibility that forfeiture officials' judgement will be distorted by the prospect of institutional gain."
Now the Justice Department wants the money back, calling the purchase "extravagant."
The government's definition of "prompt" is a little different from everyone else's, especially when it comes to asset forfeiture.
Thanks to a new state law, agencies now have to report how extensively civil asset forfeiture is used to take people's stuff.
"I felt that the glitter on the seized cash was compelling evidence, but apparently the police department disagreed."
The case will decide whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applies to the states. If so, it will also have to address how much it restricts asset forfeiture.
The justices will hear oral arguments next term in Timbs v. Indiana.
A state audit finds the Aloha State isn't keeping track of the stuff it seizes.
Rustem Kazazi was victimized by desperadoes from a gang called "Customs and Border Patrol," but thanks to the Institute for Justice he's fighting back.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks