The Sitcom and the Surveillance State
Friday A/V Club: My Three Sons vs. Good Times
This all happened last year, even after Snowden's revelations and government reforms.
Officials likely abuse access to government info databases on a daily basis.
Who will actually be defining the agenda, because it won't be these two?
Another case where calls for 'mass snooping' ignore other avenues for information.
Newspaper demands less government transparency.
House Intel Committee says he was no whistleblower.
Group lists safeguards governments should follow before hacking citizens.
The Justice Dept. doesn't think we need to know when they're looking at info about us.
Cameras attached to the bottom of a small plane can capture an area of roughly 30 square miles at any given time, transmitting real-time images to the ground.
An internal bypass mechanism in the Windows booting process makes it out into 'the wild.'
The cellphone tracking instrument has had questionable success.
It wasn't just one party who set up a system Trump could use to snoop on his enemies.
"In Russia, the legislation is compared to the USA Patriot Act."
The infamous concept of 'balance' rears its head.
Government would be able to demand tech companies provide data access.
On immigration, surveillance, torture, and press freedom, Trump's ideas are not just bad-they're unconstitutional.
Coalition of 25 bipartisan lawmakers organizes against unwarranted surveillance and data collection.
Anti-transparency measure undermines the purpose of cop cameras, according to advocates.
Keep calm and accept 24/7 surveillance.
A new book by a Wired senior editor makes the case
It's not about fighting terrorism; it's about finding leakers.
Obama's former chief speechwriter goes to bat against information leakers.
Reason TV sits down with Jon Favreau for a spirited discussion of Trump's rhetoric and Obama's record on mass surveillance, whistleblowers, drugs, & drones.
Attempt to expand unwarranted FBI surveillance authority fails (barely) in Senate.
Government report expresses concerns about accuracy, privacy, and transparency.
'You can't waive the Fourth Amendment just because it's not convenient,' says Massie.
We don't need a 'broader database.' And have we already forgotten about fusion centers?
Demands for encryption back doors removed, sort of.
'I don't want to see him in prison.'
An attempt to secretly expand what can be gathered with National Security Letters
The $4 trillion war on terror: Where did the money go?
But didn't disguise it very well
Download malware? The feds may use that as an excuse to infiltrate your computer as well.
Police in the U.K. and U.S. have used facial recognition technology on concertgoers.
'Shared Responsibility Committees' recruit neighbors to provide info-often with little training.
In the name of cyberbullying and suicide prevention, unintended consequences are not being considered.
The NSA laments what is a positive development for individual privacy and security.
The Shared Committees Responsibility program is surveillance masquerading as community service for Muslims.
The Shared Responsibility Committees program will force ordinary Muslims to spy on their own communities
The people who say they "have nothing to hide" are the most skittish about commenting on controversial topics on social media.
Ruling establishes that people have expectation of physical location privacy.
The presidential candidate's plan to snoop on Muslims is neither fair nor smart.
(Spoiler: It alienated people and didn't uncover radicals.)
More reasons to be skeptical of demands for encryption back doors.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks