No, said the Florida Court of Appeal, interpreting the Florida statute; the California Supreme Court, interpreting the California statute, had held otherwise.
The 5th Circuit noted that such orders can be issued without any credible evidence of a threat to others.
"Taking that child across the border, and if that happens without the permission of the parent, that's where we'll be able to hold accountable those that would subvert a parent's right," said one of the bill's sponsors.
And this lawsuit faces many of the same administrative law hurdles as does AHM v. FDA.
Bonus: Calling someone a "nut" isn't libel.
The economic historian and Magatte Wade, Alex Gladstein, Mohamad Machine-Chian, Tony Woodlief, and Tom Palmer are challenging authoritarians everywhere.
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
Opponents of the proposed reforms are right that unlimited majority rule is a recipe for tyranny.
An unusual coalition of liberal and conservative justices rules that property owners have right to use Quiet Title Act to contest federal intrusion on their land, even in some cases where the statute of limitations may have passed.
ADF's Erin Hawley responds to my post on the jurisdictional problems in AHM v. FDA and I reply.
The Supreme Court justice seemed willing to invalidate the federal law on First Amendment grounds.
As the government sets its sights on migrants crossing the border, native-born Americans have also come under its watchful eye.
Today, TikTok. Tomorrow, who knows?
New study sees Chicago harassing and arresting people for paperwork violations, damaging their ability to live and work, without demonstrable effect on gun violence
Which sentence in this podcast was generated using A.I.?
Books by the acclaimed mystery author have been edited, ostensibly to comport with modern sensibilities.
The badly flawed ruling defies the Supreme Court's landmark 2019 decision forbidding such Catch-22 traps.
[An excerpt from my forthcoming article on "Large Libel Models? Liability for AI Outputs."]
The former president wanted to "open up" defamation laws. The governor of Florida is about to try.
"I will not appear to condone the diminishment of any group at the expense of impertinent gestures toward another group for any reason, even when the law of the land appears to require it," he wrote.
It examines whether people are likely to "vote with their feet" based on interstate differences in abortion policy, after Dobbs. The first in a series of two articles on this topic.
Plus: Theatrics at the House hearing on TikTok, doomsday merger predictions haven't panned out, and more...
Our mobile devices constantly snitch on our whereabouts.
based on their not securing the gun they gave him and other things, given the evidence they had of his mental state.
[UPDATE: I've added excerpts from a Slate interview with the school's Board Chair, who ended up commenting on the story after all; his view is that the firing stemmed only from the failure to alert parents to the upcoming material.]
Two New Jersey women who gave birth last fall suffered harrowing ordeals thanks to their breakfast choices.
TikTok's CEO served as little more than a punching bag for lawmakers with a dizzying array of big tech grievances.
Seven sheriff's deputies say the rapper subjected them to "embarrassment, ridicule, emotional distress, humiliation, and loss of reputation" after a drug bust on his house came up empty.
This was never about shielding just the youngest kids from sexual topics.
The designer of China's Great Firewall sees new A.I. tech as a concern for public authorities.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks