Ending Section 230 Would Kill the Internet as We Know It
Don’t unleash censors; restrain them more!
Don’t unleash censors; restrain them more!
Since he favors aggressive drug law enforcement, severe penalties, and impunity for abusive police officers, he may have trouble persuading black voters that he is on their side.
Judge Carlton Reeves ripped apart the legal doctrine in his latest decision on the matter.
The war on drugs meets abortion...
Plus: Hooters discourse, Zelenskyy's plea, Jacobin posting Ls, and more...
There's no justification for cracking down on news organizations for reporting the news during war.
From tattoos to abortions to gender expression, a confusing mess of laws govern which Americans are considered adults.
The White House announced a “near final” defense pact with Saudi Arabia yesterday, just as new evidence about Saudi links to 9/11 is emerging.
"The disciplinary proceedings arose from Plaintiff's development of an 'artificial intelligence-based learning tool,' with another student, which the University's Honor Council eventually concluded 'was offensive to Emory's community standards' as it might result in academic dishonesty and cheating."
Fortson, a 23-year-old active duty airman, was shot and killed by a Florida sheriff's deputy when he opened the door to his apartment holding a gun at his side.
Without providing any evidence, the paper says "loosened restrictions on firearms" contributed to gun violence in Columbus.
The decision exemplifies a longstanding issue in legal theory. It also highlights the absurdity of zoning rules.
"Some courts have incorrectly used this exception to rationalize upholding a statute that criminalizes speech ... simply because their legislature passed a law labeling it criminal. The limited line of United States Supreme Court cases that have addressed this exception in no way supports such a broad reading."
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott takes a tactic from the progressive prosecutors he says he opposes.
Eric Levitz argues that the left should take a stand against censorship—for practical rather than principled reasons.
More usefully, the case is a reminder that insults and other expressions of opinion aren't libelous.
Cyber intrusions, arson, bombings, and other mayhem feature in the conflict between West and East.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
It took a lot of work to clear this quiz show milestone.
The House Oversight and Education committees are investigating the sources of “malign influence” behind campus protests. They’re using tactics Republicans used to hate.
"[A]ll the residences where he left materials had political signage in their yards and none of them had no trespassing signs posted. Thus, their consent to receive literature is 'implied from community custom and tradition.'"
Dexter Taylor is now a "violent felon," even though his hobby was victimless.
The same survey found that thousands of women are still getting telemedicine abortions, even if they live in states where the procedure is illegal.
Why originalist criticisms of Dobbs often misfire, and why criticisms *of* Dobbs's originalism often misfire too.
They're fleeing tyranny and seeking opportunity, not coming to "build a little army."
The case was brought by Dr. Janet Monge against the University of Pennsylvania.
New bipartisan legislation would sunset Section 230 after next year.
The intelligence community is admitting that info from data brokers is sensitive but isn’t accepting hard limits on how to use it.
Reginald Burks says he told a police officer, "Get your ass out of the way so I can take my kids to school." First Amendment lawyers say he can't be forced to apologize.
Not because of the viewpoints they express—but yes if they engage in systematic illegal conduct.
Plus: Gaza's updated child-casualty numbers, Kamala Harris being a cop, birthrate worries, and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors about President Joe Biden holding up arms shipments to Israel.
Likening drug users to people who are "mentally ill and dangerous," the ruling says barring them from owning firearms is not unconstitutional on its face.
Mollie and Michael Slaybaugh are reportedly out over $70,000. The government says it is immune.
The three-judge panel concluded unanimously that while the state law at issue is constitutional, the wildlife agents' application of it was not.
"Disciplinary measures were not sufficient to end [the encampnent] nor to deter students from quickly reestablishing it."
Hoover’s reign at the FBI compromised American civil liberties and turned the FBI into America's secret police.
Nominated stories include journalism on messy nutrition research, pickleball, government theft, homelessness, and more.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks