No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment
The freedom to protest is essential to the American project. It also does not give you carte blanche to violate other laws.
The freedom to protest is essential to the American project. It also does not give you carte blanche to violate other laws.
An excellent piece in the N.Y. Times Magazine by Prof. Stephen Carter (Yale Law).
Opponents of pandemic restrictions had their day in court and won a victory for open dissent.
Kids were jailed for minor offenses, as detailed in The Kids of Rutherford County podcast.
“The safest course of action in terms of a possible violation of the NCO would be to refrain from writing or to be interviewed for articles that mention the name of the student with whom you have an NCO (or to retract them if that’s possible).”
Since leaving Houston, Art Acevedo has bounced from job to job, continuing a spotty career marred by scandal.
While not perfect, the move is a step in the right direction for civil liberties.
The N.H. Supreme Court reversed the order.
People who were disenfranchised based on felony convictions face a new obstacle to recovering their voting rights.
New Mexico law is more pro-defendant in such cases than the laws of many other states.
It's a frightening reminder of how far the government will go to get their way—and to warn tech companies against platforming speech it doesn't like.
His understanding of effective leadership and policing should repel anyone who cares about civil liberties and the rule of law.
Qualified immunity is a badly flawed doctrine the Supreme Court should abolish. But Trump's demands are much more extreme.
"Plaintiff is entitled ... to make his own judgment about whether disclosing his identity under seal to the Court would pose an inordinate risk to his personal safety. But he is not entitled ... to special dispensation from the well-established requirements of the law."
Your Face Belongs to Us documents how facial recognition might threaten our freedom.
Republican Presidential Nomination
Plus: Javier Milei’s powerful speech on economic prosperity in Davos
The former president argues that accountability is the enemy of effectiveness, both for cops and for politicians.
Is podcaster Coleman Hughes a state capacity libertarian?
He is asking the justices to reject the Colorado Supreme Court's conclusion that he is disqualified from running for president.
In an amicus brief filed in Murthy v. Missouri, they ignore basic tenets of First Amendment law in order to quash online speech they don't like.
Facial recognition technology is increasingly being deployed by police officers across the country, but the scope of its use has been hard to pin down.
even when he "adopted a controversial 'no punt' strategy."
Plus: Libertarian populism, library wars, Latin American soft power, and more...
The justices seem inclined to revise or ditch a 1984 precedent that requires deference to executive agencies' statutory interpretations.
"There has been a deliberate attempt to inflame the public against experts," warned one Davos panelist.
How identity politics and institutional cowardice have undermined the free speech on which our society relies.
A new lawsuit is challenging a Utah law that requires age verification to use social media and forces minors to get their parents permission first.
Author James Kirchick supports the First Amendment, full stop. Why don't more journalists?
The bill is broad enough to target a Saturday Night Live skit lampooning Trump, a comedic impression of Taylor Swift, or a weird ChatGPT-generated image of Ayn Rand.
New online database details the shocking extent of intrusive surveillance tech used by American police.
Excessive judicial deference gives administrative agencies a license to rewrite the law in their favor.
Both conservative and liberal justices seem to oppose letting states get away with violating the Takings Clause merely because Congress hasn't enacted a specific law enforcing it against them.
"The fear of liability is ruining modern childhood," says one mom.
he has a right to know how and why the government took that action.”
Contrary to a widespread misconception, King did not favor absolute nonviolence, nor does his reasoning always require practitioners of civil disobedience to accept punishment. But he also strongly opposed rioting.
But that’s not adequate reason to allow them to litigate pseudonymously, a district court rules.
Modern medical devices are lifesavers. But they’re vulnerable to hackers and compromise our privacy.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10