The Fourth Amendment's Erratic Year at the Supreme Court
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had a rocky 2025.
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had a rocky 2025.
The department's lawsuit notes that the prohibited firearms are "in common use" for "lawful purposes," meaning they are covered by the Second Amendment.
"Plaintiff has not alleged that Defendants' conduct caused a mental condition in which Mr. McBreairty could not control his suicidal impulses."
Comment on this blog = reaction "from the Stanford Law School" = "negative reaction of the legal community."
Tony Gilroy examines how Andor portrays authoritarian power as a bureaucratic system, the moral compromises of life under surveillance, and the role ordinary people play in enforcing oppressive systems.
Plus: Homeownership myths and realities, discrimination at the theater, career diplomats brought home, and more...
The matter stems from a controversy over books with sexual content in the school library, and the parent's shouting that school board members "should be arrested."
Remembering an important voice from the founding era.
The lawsuit stems from Media Matters' claim that X's "content moderation policies permitted the placement of 'pro-Nazi' content next to advertisements for major brands."
The appeals court ruled that administrators violated Stuart Reges' First Amendment rights when they investigated and threatened to punish him for constitutionally protected speech.
Seven federal circuit courts have upheld the First Amendment right to record and monitor the police.
Progressive censors failed to suppress our political demons. It's finally time to confront them.
Laws requiring porn platforms to age-check visitors are becoming "a Swiss army knife for the government."
The basis for the attempt was that the girl had texted a classmate that she was thinking of hanging herself.
Progressive censors failed to suppress our political demons. It's finally time to confront them.
"Once a president establishes for himself that he has a shiny toy, good luck getting that toy ever wrested away from whoever the president is," the CNN anchor tells Reason's Nick Gillespie.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi are back to break down another unhinged week in the news.
"[I]n the public university setting, student disagreement with a professor's academic speech on an issue of public concern cannot alter the Pickering analysis in the government's favor."
The self-made tycoon was convicted this week of violating Hong Kong's "national security" law. But he could have escaped it.
Keonne Rodriguez explains why he built a bitcoin privacy tool, discusses the federal charges that sent him to prison this week, and warns that his case could redefine the legal boundaries of financial privacy.
Larry Bushart's lawyers argue that his arrest for constitutionally protected speech violated the First and Fourth amendments.
The administration doesn't want to win these cases. It wants to intimidate Americans who oppose its immigration policies.
(Not the Chinese Boy George.)
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
The defense secretary claims the video, which shows a second strike that killed two floundering survivors, would compromise "sources and methods."
Proponents say such IDs will make life easier and protect kids from dangerous content. But opponents worry they will make you much easier to target.
It's an insane—and frighteningly dystopian—interpretation of the law.
Katherine Dee examines how living online reshapes attention and behavior and makes the case for a more grounded, realistic way of using digital tools.
The proposed bills aim to revive and codify a 1971 Supreme Court ruling that allowed individuals to sue the feds for Fourth Amendment violations.
Reason's Robby Soave and Elizabeth Nolan Brown go head to head with Emily Jashinsky and Ryan Grim from Breaking Points in a thought-provoking debate about Big Tech.
Individuals and communities must take responsibility for their own safety.
This is Priscilla Villarreal’s second trip to the Supreme Court, which last year revived her First Amendment lawsuit.
"There was also evidence presented regarding Liza's alleged delusional thinking and hallucinations. Eli testified that Liza told him Kenneth was his physical father, but actor Chris Hemsworth was his spiritual father. Eli also testified that for years Liza had talked about having another daughter someday, whom she would name Phoebe, and Hemsworth would be the father. Brigham testified that Liza told him she believed Hemsworth was the children's father." Plus unschooling, unbathing, and more.
Plus: Universal child care polls well, DEI and generational dynamics, and more...
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.