Do Ordinary Speakers Have Lesser First Amendment Rights Than Newspapers Do?
"Yes," the Minnesota Supreme Court said in 1980 -- now it's being asked to reconsider that.
"Yes," the Minnesota Supreme Court said in 1980 -- now it's being asked to reconsider that.
CDC surveys in the 1990s, never publicly reported, indicate nearly 2.5 million defensive uses of guns a year. That matches the results of Gary Kleck's controversial surveys, and it indicates more defensive than offensive uses of guns.
But its illiberal tactics against liberal Muslim reformers remain extremely troubling.
On another National School Walkout day, 57 percent of teens are worried about dying in a school shooting. They shouldn't be.
Activists who stormed the stage were shocked when alumni in the audience dared to heckle them.
It's a dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Judge Edith Jones, in a case that upheld a $350 cap for contributions to Austin City Council races.
But dumb, offensive speech still isn't violence.
Today people are shamed for not sharing personal information about themselves.
The percentage of young adults saying abortion should be legal in all or most cases has risen 10 percentage points since 2015.
Randa Jarrar reveals hypocrisy on the right.
An impressive new movie dramatizes the story behind the famous Supreme Court case about whether it is permissible for the government to condemn homes in order to promote private "economic development."
"Privacy is not for sale, and human rights should not be compromised out of fear or greed."
I'm crowd-testing this draft amicus brief, which I need to be file by Wednesday, April 25. Please tell me what I'm getting wrong here!
The U.S. Supreme Court had rejected the Massachusetts court's earlier arguments for why stun guns aren't covered by the Second Amendment, but had sent the case back for the Massachusetts court to consider other arguments.
Lawmakers passed a bill requiring American firms to comply with warrants for data stored overseas, ending a legal fight.
When it comes to mishandling the details of your life, social media has nothing on the tax man.
The student handbook makes it clear that students broke university policy.
The therapists would be mandatory in middle and high schools.
From One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest to Black Peter, the Czech-born Oscar-winner championed eccentric individuals and artists over small-minded bureaucrats and a stifling state.
Congress doesn't have the best track record on privacy rights.
Democrats are rehabilitating the deservedly poor reputations of surveillance-state officials who were caught lying to the American people
"We're not children! You can't talk to us like that!"
They say it's to protect free speech.
Faculty take a stand against an unfair investigation.
We can think of at least one whistleblower who agrees.
Does the Supreme Court's decision in Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015) -- which upheld a restriction on fundraising by a judicial candidate -- also authorize much broader bans on candidate speech?
London's got a homicide problem, but leaders insist it's being caused by the tools.
"You used language of safety and protection earlier. We see this happening on college campuses all across the country."
A Michigan jury tampering case strikes at the heart of the First Amendment.
"If Facebook and other online companies will not or cannot fix their privacy invasions, then we are going to have to. We, the Congress."
A plain reading of the text suggests that Deerfield's new law covers all semi-automatic rifles that can hold more than 10 rounds.
If you want to avoid conflict among hostile groups, decentralize power-preferably to individuals.
London's murder numbers now exceed New York's. But the new murders teach old lessons: Drug wars are bad and weapon laws don't stop crime.
We need to up our media literacy game, not delegate responsibility to politicians who have no idea what they're doing.
Fatal shootings in Portland and Brooklyn demonstrate how fear pushes officers to escalate encounters.
Prodding private companies into self-censorship is a dangerous government tradition.
"I do not believe that the American public wants banks to decide which legal products consumers can and cannot buy."
An interesting Arizona appellate decision rejecting a court's assignment of a treating therapist, and rejecting a gag order that limited parents' discussions with the child.
His obsession with Justice Scalia's aside in Heller about "weapons...most useful in military service" ignores Scalia writing of weapons "typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes."
5 editorials call for the federal government to thwart Sinclair's expansion efforts in wake of creepy promo video; meanwhile you can count the number of anti-FOSTA eds on one finger
Deerfield would fine residents up to $1,000 for owning one of a dizzying array of firearms.
Giving juries the power to destroy a journalism enterprise for being offensive is bad for free expression.
Williamson's rhetoric is inflammatory, but his views on abortion are not beyond the pale.
A Florida case highlights the due process issues raised by gun violence restraining orders.
"We want people to come here and have a good time and to feel safe."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks