Why a Broad View of Academic Freedom Is Essential
Most things faculty publish don’t lead to a backlash. But that doesn’t mean that there’s not an academic freedom problem.
Most things faculty publish don’t lead to a backlash. But that doesn’t mean that there’s not an academic freedom problem.
Two courts say COVID-19 lockdowns in Michigan and Pennsylvania were unconstitutional.
These beliefs shouldn’t be considered the only legitimate way to see the world.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito worry about the future of religious freedom. That’s not the same as a call to overturn the decision.
The dynamics of the information ecosystem have impacted research and teaching.
Profs. Ilana Redstone and John Villasenor are guest-blogging this week about their new book.
A federal district court rejects the argument that the documentary will violate trade secret rights related to "a long-lost photograph that purportedly depicts Abraham Lincoln lying wounded on the night of his assassination."
As usual, at this point in the litigation the key questions focus on procedure.
The injunction, the court held, is an unconstitutional prior restraint.
And that's true even if state graffiti law provided probable cause for the arrest, so long as there's evidence that chalking with other messages almost never leads to arrests.
Regina Ip spins a fantasy of a just government restoring order to Hong Kong.
The 7th Circuit judge’s track record suggests she would frequently be a friend of civil liberties.
Leaders of the organization reportedly see this as tacit approval.
An interesting decision, on a motion for default judgment.
Selling weapons to the UAE would stamp brutality and extremism abroad with American approval.
Why does media coverage conclude the problem is that the government hasn’t done a good enough job of spying?
(at least unless she gets case-by-case permission to enter that property). But a federal district judge has correctly held that this likely violated the First Amendment.
The opinion, which suggests a strong concern about due process, will nevertheless be cited as evidence of the SCOTUS nominee's "uniformly conservative" record.
Politicians are poised to tighten the screws, even though voluntary action offers more promise.
"The Croziers allege that the teacher 'lied to intentionally defame and label A.C. as a 'racist who said the N-word.'"
This would include group membership, information about where a spouse works, and more.
So concludes the Louisiana Supreme Court, in allowing a prisoner access to the jury vote breakdown in his case—quite important given the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling rejecting Louisiana nonunanimous convictions.
The SCOTUS contender's 2019 dissent will alarm gun control supporters but reassure people who want judges to take this constitutional provision as seriously as others.
The case is an encouraging sign that the SCOTUS contender is not the sort of judge who bends over backward to shield cops from liability for outrageous misconduct.
A new DOJ proposal aims to bring the internet communications law in line with Trump's personal interpretation of it.
Peace will come only from leaving other people alone on the condition that they do the same for us.
A trial court said this pouring (without the target's consent) was indeed constitutionally protected; it took a 2-1 Texas Court of Appeals decision to reverse that.
The parts that aren't constitutionally dubious are brainless culture-war fodder.
So far, they don't seem to have actually closed the borders. But his threat probably has a different aim.
Perspectives on the proposed federal classification of Portland and other cities in crisis.
In the 20th century, far more people were murdered by genocidal governments than by armed criminals.
"Scathing comments" from an anonymous faculty survey (reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education), plus an article in the Atlantic. You can't buy publicity like that, as they say, or faculty morale like that.
While the 7th Circuit judge is often skeptical of the government's position, some of her conclusions will give pause to civil libertarians.
The Big Apple is practically a black hole of overpolicing and regulation.
What's next for SCOTUS?
The passing of a feminist heroine, and a giant of American jurisprudence.
The students are at Florida International University, "Miami's first and only public research university."
So the Third Circuit held yesterday.
There’s nothing good about censoring communication platforms citizens want to use.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10