There's No Way FOSTA Isn't a First Amendment Violation, Says Lawsuit
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
Under the new regulations, Title IX investigators can deny students access to the evidence against them.
Should an appellate court provisionally seal a brief until the case is heard on the merits? Or should it try to make a redacted version promptly available?
A new Cato report sheds light on "jawboning," or attempts by state actors "to sway the decisions of private platforms and limit the publication of disfavored speech."
Politicians bypass hard legislative work and constitutional protections to target activities they don’t like.
Behind the scenes, federal officials pressure social media platforms to suppress disfavored speech.
"The Court fails to see how the presence of a person recording a video near an officer interferes with the officer's activities," the judge wrote.
Data collection is not the same as surveillance.
"consisting of approximately 171 million handguns, 146 million rifles, and 98 million shotguns." There are also estimates of AR-15 ownership and ownership of magazines that hold over 10 rounds (which some state laws classify as "large-capacity").
You don't have to prove to a government official that you have “proper cause” to exercise your constitutional right, the Court ruled.
The Transportation Security Administration is one of the more useless, invasive appendages of the post-9/11 security state. It’s well past time to get rid of it.
But wouldn't the arguments in the dissent equally cast doubt on all historical analysis in constitutional cases, or even statutory or common-law cases?
Winslow had accused a doctor working on contract with an immigration detention center of "perform[ing] illegal hysterectomies on women at the direction of Trump and [DHS]."
The results also confirm that "assault weapons" and "large capacity" magazines are widely used for lawful purposes.
Proposed internet bans open a can of worms about how to punish those involved in creating and consuming controversial content.
A new survey from FIRE shows one-third of college students report it is “sometimes” or “always” acceptable to shout down a controversial campus speaker.
The analysis reinforces the historical case for armed self-defense in response to racist violence.
Cloudflare's decision brings up fundamental questions about how internet infrastructure companies should operate.
Plus: The wage premium from having a college degree is falling, study finds black access to firearms reduced lynchings during Jim Crow, and more...
companies to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and contents."
A judge sided with a plaintiff who objects to procuring coverage for HIV-prevention medications. Rightly so.
I'm glad to do such things, and to get students involved to give them practical experience.
Plus: FIRE sues to stop the Stop WOKE Act, processing times for skilled immigrants skyrocket, and more...
at least through a preliminary injunction, even if the books include some moderately graphic descriptions.
The first government official has been removed by judicial order for participating in the January 6th "insurrection"
Clearly hostile, but was it threatening?
The FBI's long history of using informants and manufactured plots to prosecute extremists
"One of the things that the left and right have in common is an awareness that our government has essentially been co-opted by corporate power," says the Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist.
The Eighth Circuit tries to rein in the criminalization of the intentional infliction of emotional distress tort.
The president's attack on the "extreme ideology" of "MAGA Republicans" elides the tension between majority rule and individual freedom.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.