Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting for a Post-Pandemic 'Return to Normal'
We’re likely to be poorer, distrustful, and less free for years to come.
We’re likely to be poorer, distrustful, and less free for years to come.
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
An indictment for a crime, the court stresses, is very different from a conviction of the crime.
An overview of state efforts to combat election misinformation.
It’s a terrible ruling that misunderstands years of First Amendment precedents. And it’s increasingly likely that the Supreme Court will have to intervene.
Although the federal government has largely stayed out of regulating the content of election-related speech, the states have been surprisingly active in passing laws that prohibit false statements associated with elections.
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
They mandate occupation of private property without the consent of the owner.
Anti-royalists are facing fines and jail sentences for disrupting ceremonial events
Brittany Martin, who is pregnant, was sentenced to four years in prison after telling police they'd "better be ready to die for the blue. I'm ready to die for the black."
Yes, according to a growing body of research, says criminologist Adam Lankford.
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
The problem is the Court's ultra-broad interpretation of Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. But the justices might cut that back.
While a new report highlights Mississippi's jailing of mentally ill people, the practice is common nationwide.
The senator's avowed devotion to federalism is no match for his political ambitions.
Plus: Court-ordered "care," railroad strike averted (for now), and more...
Under the new regulations, Title IX investigators can deny students access to the evidence against them.
"On information and belief, and as discovery will likely reveal, Green has been acting as a proxy for another performer who, mistakenly believing that she and Plaintiff are stars of equal stature, has repeatedly used other social media intermediaries in a hopeless effort to advance her career at Plaintiff’s expense."
Should an appellate court provisionally seal a brief until the case is heard on the merits? Or should it try to make a redacted version promptly available?
A new Cato report sheds light on "jawboning," or attempts by state actors "to sway the decisions of private platforms and limit the publication of disfavored speech."
The Republican senator improbably claims his bill is authorized by the 14th Amendment and the Commerce Clause.
"This is inhumane," one child told state inspectors.
Politicians bypass hard legislative work and constitutional protections to target activities they don’t like.
Behind the scenes, federal officials pressure social media platforms to suppress disfavored speech.
When it comes to gender identity issues, some conservatives make a mockery of liberty and parental rights.
"The Court fails to see how the presence of a person recording a video near an officer interferes with the officer's activities," the judge wrote.
Plus: Backdoor censorship on social media, how the airline bailouts failed, and more...
Data collection is not the same as surveillance.
"consisting of approximately 171 million handguns, 146 million rifles, and 98 million shotguns." There are also estimates of AR-15 ownership and ownership of magazines that hold over 10 rounds (which some state laws classify as "large-capacity").
You don't have to prove to a government official that you have “proper cause” to exercise your constitutional right, the Court ruled.
The Court's popularity has indeed fallen. But its relatively low approval ratings are neither unprecedented, nor worse than those of the other branches of government.
The Transportation Security Administration is one of the more useless, invasive appendages of the post-9/11 security state. It’s well past time to get rid of it.
But wouldn't the arguments in the dissent equally cast doubt on all historical analysis in constitutional cases, or even statutory or common-law cases?