Hunter Biden Walks Free While This Iowa Man Serves 4 Years for the Same 'Crime'
The contrast between the two cases illustrates the haphazard impact of an arbitrary, constitutionally dubious gun law.
The contrast between the two cases illustrates the haphazard impact of an arbitrary, constitutionally dubious gun law.
In response to a Second Amendment lawsuit, the government says the restriction "serves legitimate objectives" and "only modestly burdens" the right to arms.
New laws on interchange fees will transform credit card payments into detailed government-accessible records of every item purchased, including firearms
The taxes on sound suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns, originally enacted in 1934, were meant to be prohibitive, imposing bans in the guise of raising revenue.
Democratic critics of the new program overlook the injustice of permanently disarming Americans who pose no threat to public safety.
Partly from coercion and partly by choice, many banks and social media businesses impose severe gun controls
The appeals court concluded that the restriction impinges on the right to arms and is not consistent with the historical tradition of firearm regulation.
Long restricted by federal law, suppressors are poised to be freed by litigation or legislation.
The Fifth Circuit hands down a highly fact-specific decision in a Second Amendment challenge to a federal law.
Melynda Vincent is asking the justices to decide whether it's constitutional to disarm people based on nothing more than a nonviolent criminal conviction.
No, says a magistrate judge.
Unanimous rulings on discrimination, guns, and religion once again challenge the common media narrative that the Court is hopelessly polarized.
"A manufacturer of goods is not an accomplice to every unaffiliated retailer whom it fails to make follow the law."
My wife and I built our defensive skills with six days of sweat, dust, and the right mindset.
Joel Alicea’s defense of originalism demonstrates broad applicability of the text-history method.
It’s déjà vu all over again.
It’s a small step in the right direction for self-defense rights.
The state may have a hard time showing that its broad restrictions are consistent with the "historical tradition of firearm regulation."
Is the small-government Democrat beefing up state power?
The movie star’s special treatment highlights the injustice of an illogical federal law.
The article covers state sanctuary policies, their constitutional basis, how they can constrain Trump's mass deportation efforts, and how Trump can try to get around them.
More litigation is required to find out which kits and unfinished parts are subject to regulation.
Narrow decision leaves ATF regulation in limbo.
Canada long relied on the U.S. for protection. Now it needs to rediscover self-reliance.
A new Justice Department rule could help "prohibited persons" who pose no threat to public safety.
The Court's opinion upholding federal regulation of "ghost guns" makes passing reference to Loper Bright Enterprises.
Good intentions, bad results.
"even though that necessity wasn't fully apparent in the moment."
Millions of people are barred from owning firearms even though they have no history of violence, and they have essentially no recourse under current law.
The Supreme Court will decide whether this threat to the Second Amendment is legally viable.
If the Mexican executive branch obeyed the Mexican Constitution, the Mexican people would be safer
Mexico's amici take shots at our brief in Smith and Wesson v. Mexico
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks