The Social Cost of Nullifying the Right to Arms: The Case of Mexico
If the Mexican executive branch obeyed the Mexican Constitution, the Mexican people would be safer
If the Mexican executive branch obeyed the Mexican Constitution, the Mexican people would be safer
Mexico's amici take shots at our brief in Smith and Wesson v. Mexico
The government failed to persuade the appeals court that 18-to-20-year-olds are not part of "the people" or that the age restriction is consistent with the "historical tradition of firearm regulation."
Though awkward and antiquated, the Second Amendment’s syntax and grammar unambiguously protect gun rights.
The president-elect lost his Second Amendment rights thanks to a nonsensical gun ban.
Patrick Darnell Daniels Jr. was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for violating a federal law that bars drug users from owning firearms.
A few months ago, the Sixth Circuit upheld the federal categorical prohibition on gun acquisition and transportation by people under indictment.
Measures restricting gun ownership still disproportionately harm black and brown people, says Maj Toure, founder of "Black Guns Matter."
More laws couldn’t have stopped the crime and won’t stop people from making their own weapons.
Present your paper for review by diverse scholars
Gabriel Metcalf argues that his prosecution under the Gun-Free School Zones Act violated his constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
Maybe we can all agree that government officials shouldn’t target political enemies.
The draconian penalties that Hunter Biden escaped affect many people whose fathers cannot save them.
Joe Biden says his son did not deserve prison for violating firearm laws that the president vigorously defends and has made more severe.
Stop accusing your political opponents of wanting to murder children.
The nominee for attorney general passes the Trump loyalty test, but he lacks relevant experience and has repeatedly demonstrated poor judgment.
U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn says the law bans firearms covered by the Second Amendment and is not supported by historical precedent.
The judges divide over whether a challenge to a law limiting the number of bullets in a magazine is likely to succeed. Is next stop the Supreme Court?
The police targeted “sovereign citizens” for surveillance and disarmament.
But the Arizona Court of Appeals just reversed, concluding that speech about a person generally isn't "harassment," even if unwanted speech directed to the person may be.
Free and online, Oct. 18, from U. Wyo. Firearms Research Center.
Journalists should be interested in interrogating this contradiction, should the 2024 presidential candidate continue giving interviews.
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
The company claims its machines are more effective than store shelves at preventing shoplifters or underage purchases.
A great free resource for lawyers, judges, academics, and students doing cross-state constitutional law research.
Innovation and defiance hobble government efforts at control.
"A couple million times a year, people use guns defensively," says economist and author John Lott.
His "Revisionist History" podcast can amount to historical fiction
Often, the best thing for lawmakers to do is nothing.
The ruling says some restrictions on guns in "sensitive places" are constitutionally dubious but upholds several others.
The case is another example of stretching criminal laws to hold parents accountable for their children's violence.
The ruling concludes that the government failed to show an Illinois ban is "consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."
The Second Amendment doesn’t protect guns; it protects the human right to self-defense.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks