New York's Message to Gun Owners: You Can Have a Carry Permit. Good Luck Using It.
A New York Times story about the state's location-specific gun bans glosses over the vast territory they cover.
A New York Times story about the state's location-specific gun bans glosses over the vast territory they cover.
Although the law did not change, regulators suddenly decided to criminalize unregistered possession of braced pistols.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the Second Amendment, gun control, and mass shootings.
The government argued that marijuana users have no Second Amendment rights because they are dangerous, unvirtuous, and untrustworthy.
The president seems to have forgotten his concession that such laws leave murderers with plenty of options that are "just as deadly."
The researchers identified 662 cases involving threats to multiple victims, but they concede that it's likely "there are many more threats than completed events."
The city has not granted a single permit since the Supreme Court upheld the right to bear arms last June.
an argument about post-Bruen gun legislation from Robert Leider.
By banning firearms from a wide range of "sensitive places," the state effectively nullified the right to bear arms.
The law is hard to defend on logical, practical, or constitutional grounds.
Because of a misdemeanor welfare fraud conviction, Bryan Range is no longer allowed to own guns.
The decision defends the separation of powers and the rule of law against an attempt to prohibit firearm accessories by administrative fiat.
The new ban, which has been blocked by a state judge, so far has fared better in federal court.
It’s a bold and probably unconstitutional goal that’s bound to alienate millions of Americans.
The state's ban applies unless the property owner posts a sign allowing firearms or otherwise gives "express consent."
Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns
The libertarian activist on gun rights, the new BLM ("Black Libertarian Movement"), and his support for the Mises Caucus.
Even people who use cannabis for medical purposes risk severe penalties for daring to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Gun Owners of America prevail in Antonyuk v. Hochul
The agency should be abolished and its employees sent to seek jobs in the private sector.
The state made it a felony to carry handguns for self-defense in "any place of worship or religious observation."
Fearmongering about mass school shootings leads to some dumb, privacy-threatening ideas.
Carry permit applicants would have to prove they are not dangerous, and guns would be banned from myriad locations.
Legislators in both states favor subjective standards and sweeping restrictions for carry permits.
The president supports the law that could send his son to prison for lying about his personal habits while buying a firearm.
The war on drugs conspires with the war on guns to make a mockery of justice.
The decision is a warning to states that impose vague permit standards or sweeping bans on guns in "sensitive locations."
A deeply flawed documentary by the gray lady unwittingly makes the case for why the CDC shouldn't be studying gun violence.
Amidst official hysteria over “misinformation,” the president continues to willfully misrepresent the facts on firearms.
Politicians bypass hard legislative work and constitutional protections to target activities they don’t like.
You don't have to prove to a government official that you have “proper cause” to exercise your constitutional right, the Court ruled.
The results also confirm that "assault weapons" and "large capacity" magazines are widely used for lawful purposes.
The analysis reinforces the historical case for armed self-defense in response to racist violence.
Approximately 36 blocks around Times Square will now be deemed a "gun-free zone." What purpose is served by this?
The Texas gubernatorial candidate's interpretation reflects his assumption that opponents of "assault weapon" bans don't care about murdered schoolchildren.
Legal history before 1900 provides no support for licensing or training mandates for keeping an arm at home
It is hard to see how, given the contortions required to deliver the unilateral prohibition that Donald Trump demanded.
Article for Cato Supreme Court Review
Regulators imposed the ban based on a highly implausible and counterintuitive reading of federal law.
Lawmakers claimed they were just banning marketing guns to kids.
It is unlikely to stop mass shootings, but it will restrict Second Amendment rights and unjustly send people to prison.
Even while conceding that the rifles they want to ban are commonly used for lawful purposes, they refuse to grapple with the implications.
Recent polling suggests that Americans are starting to recognize that such laws make no sense.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10