Jack Dorsey's Exit From Twitter Could Worsen Tech Censorship
The site's long-serving boss might be more committed to free speech than his successor, Parag Agrawal.
The site's long-serving boss might be more committed to free speech than his successor, Parag Agrawal.
A school board official told said "students would not participate in a book-club event scheduled for February with Nadia Murad, a Nobel Prize-winner and activist," because "Ms. Murad’s book, 'The Last Girl: My Story of Captivity, and My Fight Against the Islamic State,' would foster Islamophobia."
Florida passed a law to stop big tech “censorship.” But the law itself tramples First Amendment rights.
No, because courts conclude that those terms are just opinions and name-calling.
The official was the Vice President for Student Affairs and Diversity at the University of North Dakota.
Are universities supposed to have institutional views on the facts about self-defense in a case half a continent way?
We talk about blogging, social media and free speech, the Religion Clauses, and federalism and individual rights.
The newspaper wrongly implies that press freedom is limited to "real" journalists.
“UNOS’s reasoning boils down to a desire to keep indiscreet communications out of the public eye, which is not enough to satisfy our standard for good cause.”
From leading liberal constitutional law professor Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
"Representatives of a public entity taking the opportunity to squelch plaintiffs' views as apostasy"; the squelching was partly based on claims that certain remarks are "abusive and coded in racist terms, also known as 'dog whistles,'" and that "comments about the District's equity survey" were "'irrelevant' to the meeting agenda item of the District's equity policy."
Defendant had posted three photos to Instagram showing (1) a movie ticket, (2) ammunition, and (3) the inside of a theater, and also one to Snapchat showing (4) a handgun.
Amar: The Yale Law School administration has been "dilatory, duplicitous, disingenuous, downright deplorable."
Appalling that an American university, which had publicly committed itself to free expression, would thus censor criticism of a foreign government (whether China, Israel, or any other).
The court takes a narrow view of 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1), but rejects liability as a matter of state law: “public policy [with regard to how gun sales can be arranged] is more properly determined by the peoples’ elected representatives rather than by the courts.”
Sen. Amy Klobuchar wants to put HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the former California attorney general with a reputation for being a partisan hack, in charge of "health disinformation" online.
When should rap lyrics (or other works) be admissible as evidence on the theory that they reflect real events?
Plus: Consumer prices surge, a Virginia school district talks openly about burning books, and more...
Misinformation and bad policy can only be defeated by robust, open debate in the public square.
"Plaintiff is an adult who chose to enter the political arena and now to file this litigation, asserting claims against Defendant as a result of Defendant's alleged statements and activities concerning Plaintiff and Plaintiff's political campaign."
The government had tried to shut down the 200-acre grounds for two months (including during a special session of the Legislature) for tree decoration.
The anti-Biden slogan is clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Universities should not compel professors to affirm their belief of contested values
for saying "LGBTQ+" "Pride" message is "against our biblical doctrine."
That can't be constitutional.