Court in Civil Case Holds Trump's Jan. 6 Speech Could Be Constitutionally Unprotected Incitement
But the claims against Donald J. Trump, Jr. and Rudy Giuliani are dismissed.
But the claims against Donald J. Trump, Jr. and Rudy Giuliani are dismissed.
Kokomo officials agree not to enforce ordinance banning “obscene, indecent, or immoral” signs against flag that says “Fuck Biden and fuck you for voting for him.”
According to a former federal prosecutor, the seemingly redundant case sends "the message that the Justice Department won't tolerate this type of racist hatred."
In the new book Free Speech, the Danish activist defends radical self-expression from Socrates to social media.
"The jurors repeatedly assured the Court's law clerk that these notifications had not affected them in any way or played any role whatever in their deliberations."
Plus: Trafficking visas, a new no-fly list?, and more...
"He hath no more law than [a monkey/bull/goose]" vs. slight mischaracterization of legal advice.
N.Y. appellate court reverses the order.
The conservative think tank identifies some genuine concerns about tech companies, but gets the prescription wrong.
The ad was an ad for a college that he had attended.
Nearly 90 gag-order bills would ban schools from teaching the grisly particulars of American history. This activist is fighting against the censorship and for school choice.
The sheriff's deputies are also not entitled to qualified immunity because the First Amendment right to offend police has been repeatedly upheld.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats can be trusted to give an honest account of what happened that day.
"Upon full understanding, I do not view these posters as racist; they are political statements," said university president Mark Wrighton.
This may be especially helpful in cases involving sealing or pseudonymity, where the parties agree with each other but the public interest ought to be represented.
Enforcing that agreement isn’t an unconstitutional prior restraint, holds the Georgia Court of Appeals.
"The peer-review process—not a courtroom—... provides the best mechanism for resolving scientific uncertainties."
The Supreme Court will soon decide a case that tests the limits of expression on government property and religious toleration.
Plus: Mask mandates and omicron cases, purging "pornography" drives calls for book bans, and more...
Defense lawyer Amy Phillips is suing over what she calls the department's "watchlist policy."
“Like it or not, news analysis is often delivered with plenty of English on the ball in service of an ideological agenda and market viability. Whether such practices contribute positively to delivering our species closer to the truth is a question for philosophers. It is not enough to support a defamation claim.”
A Scottish man was just convicted for tweeting an insult about a dead person. The authorities already have too much power to censor.
Well, it's Judge Bradford Thomas of the Florida Court of Appeal, but still an interesting synthesis of recent criticisms, with some extra analysis added.
The scandal du jour reminds us that radical free speech is alive and well.
What do you think Georgetown faculty should be free to say in the public debate about such matters?
Butts County, Georgia, Sheriff Gary Long cited no evidence to support his pre-Halloween stunt.
and unprotected by the First Amendment. An incorrect decision, it seems to me.
More than 100 law professors agree that "academic freedom protects Shapiro's views."